Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in Microbial Populations and Enzyme Activities During the Bioremediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the process of bioremediation in the soil contaminated by different oil concentrations, the changes in the microbial numbers (bacteria and fungi) and the enzyme (catalase (CAT), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and lipase) activities were evaluated over a 2-year period. The results showed that the microbial numbers after 2-year bioremediation were one to ten times higher than those in the initial. The changes in the bacterial and the fungal populations were different during the bioremediation, and the highest microbial numbers for bacteria and fungi were 5.51 × 109 CFU g−1 dry soil in treatment 3 (10,000 mg kg−1) in the initial and 5.54 × 105 CFU g−1 dry soil in treatment 5 (50,000 mg kg−1) after the 2-year bioremediation period, respectively. The CAT and PPO activities in the contaminated soil decreased with increasing oil concentration, while the lipase activity increased. The activities of CAT and PPO improved after the bioremediation, but lipase activity was on the contrary. The CAT activity was more sensible to the oil than others, and could be alternative to monitor the bioremediation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolan NS, Duraisamy VP (2003) Role of inorganic and organic soil amendments on immobilization and phytoavailability of heavy metals: a review involving specific case studies. Aust J Soil Res 41:533–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The rhizophere. Springer, New York, pp 9–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Val C, Barea JM, Azcón-Aguilar C (1999) Assessing the tolerance to heavy metals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi isolated from sewage sludge-contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol 11:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entry JA, Wood BH, Edwards JH, Wood CW (1997) Influence of organic by products and nitrogen source on chemical and microbiological status of an agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 24:196–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Gil JC, Plaza C, Soler-Rovira P, Polo A (2000) Longterm effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1907–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan SM (1986) Soil enzyme and research method[M]. Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp 274–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Li P, Zhou QX, Xu HX, Zhang HR (2004) Microbial changes in rhizospheric soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons after bioremediation. J Environ Sci 16:987–990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Li XJ, Li PJ, Li F, Zhang L, Zhou QX (2008) Evaluation of plant–microorganism synergy for the remediation of diesel fuel contaminated Soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81:19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madejón P, Murillo JM, Marañón T, Cabrera F, López R (2001) Elementos traza en gramíneas afectadas por el vertido tóxico de las minas de Aznalcóllar. Invest Agr Prod Prot Veg 16:429–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Madejón E, Burgos P, López R, Cabrera F (2003) Agricultural use of three organic residues: effect on orange production and on properties of a soil of the “Comarca Costa de Huelva” (SW Spain). Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 65:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maliszweska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B (2003) Habitat function if agricultural soils as affected by heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination. Environ Int 28:719–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F (2000) Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere 40:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard P (2001) Ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge amended soils. Appl Geochem 16:1405–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst CE, Hawke BG, McDonald HJ, Kirkby CA, Buckerfield JC, Michelsen P, O’Brien KA, Gupta VVSR, Doube BM (1995) Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health. Aust J Exp Agr 35:1015–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ (2000) Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous wastes. Chemosphere 41:219–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou QX, Song YF (2004) Principles and methods of contaminated soil remediation. Science Press, Beijing, pp 556–560

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funds provided by Innovative Program of The Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-446), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2007AA06A405), National Natural Science Foundation of China (20807029), and National Basic Research Program of China (2004CB418506).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojun Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, X., Li, X., Sun, T. et al. Changes in Microbial Populations and Enzyme Activities During the Bioremediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83, 542–547 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9838-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9838-x

Keywords

Navigation