Abstract
Purpose
Community treatment orders (CTOs) are sometimes used to coerce patients into treatment on the basis that such treatment is in their best interest. The experiences of Maori, New Zealand’s indigenous ethnic minority are less well known and this paper compares the views of Maori and non-Maori about CTOs.
Methods
Patients with experience of CTOs for greater than 6 months participated. Self-report measures were used to identify patients’ views of compulsory treatment. Demographic data, heath service characteristics, the experience of coercion, views of compulsory community treatment, satisfaction with care, social functioning, and psychopathology were assessed.
Results
There were few differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between Maori and non-Maori. There were no differences in the views of Maori compared to non-Maori patients with respect to compulsory community treatment. There were no differences in the views of Maori cared for by mainstream compared to culturally specialist Maori mental health service.
Conclusions
In a well-established system of compulsory treatment, there is no evidence of greater negative impact of CTOs in an indigenous minority population. The opportunity for Maori to self-select between mainstream and specialist Maori mental health services may minimize the negative aspects of compulsory community treatment for Maori.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act. (1992). Available at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1992/0046/latest/DLM262176.html
Okai D, Owen G, McGuire H, Singh S, Churchill R, Hotopf M (2007) Mental capacity in psychiatric patients. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 191:291–297
Callaghan S, Ryan C (2012) Rising to the human rights challenge in compulsory treatment: new approaches to mental health law in Australia. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 46(7):11–20
Gray J, McSherry B, O’Reilly R, Weller P (2010) Australian and Canadian mental health acts compared. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 44(12):1126–1131
Newton-Howes G, Mullen R (2011) Coercion in psychiatric care: systematic review of correlated and themes. Psychiatr Serv 62:465–470
Kisley S, Campbell L, Preston N (2005) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3, Art No CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub2
Newton-Howes G (2012) A factor analysis of patients’ views of compulsory community treatment orders: the factors associated with detention. Psychiatry, Philosophy and Law Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2012.715827
Ministry of Health (2012) Office of the Director of Mental Health: Annual Report 2012. Ministry of Health, Wellington
Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, Dawson J, Yeeles K, Vazquez-Montes M, Priebe S (2013) Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 381(9878):1627–1633
Birley J (2000) Political abuse of psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 101:13–15
Fulford KW, Smirnov AY, Snow E (1993) Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR. Br J Psychiatry 162:801–810
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007) Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
Johnstone K, Read J (2000) Psychiatrists’ recommendations for improving bicultural training and Maori mental health services: a New Zealand survey. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 34:135–145
Kumar S, Ng B, Simpson A, Fisher J, Robinson E (2008) No evidence for restrictive care practices in Maori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:387–391
Harris R, Tobias M, Jeffreys M, Karlsen S, Nazroo J (2006) Effects of self reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Māori health and inequalities in New Zealand: cross-sectional study. Lancet 367:2005–2009
Gibbs A, Dawson J, Forsyth H et al (2004) Maori experience of community treatment orders in Otago, New Zealand. ANZJP 38:830–835
Newton-Howes G, Marsh R (2012), Personality dysfunction and social functioning in schizophrenia. Personality and Mental Health. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmh.1206/abstract;jsessionid=A4BC7543320232F4BABF08ABA12583EB.d02t04?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
Otago CTO Study (2000). Patient interview tool used as basis for development of research. Available at: http://www.otago.ac.nz/law/otagoCTO/instruments/index.html
King M, McKeown E, Warner J, Ramsay A, Johnson K, Cort C, Davidson O (2003) Mental health and quality of life of gay men and lesbians in England and Wales Controlled, cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry 183(6):552–558
Swartz M, Swanson J, Wagner H, Burns B, Hiday V, Bothrum R (1999) Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism? Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry 156:1968–1975
Atkinson C, Zwick R (1982) The client satisfaction questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Progr Plan 5(3):233–237
Moran P, Leese M, Lee T (2003) Standardised Assessment of Personality–Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry 183:228–232
Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9:13–28
Tyrer P, Nur U, Carwford M et al (2005) The social functioning questionnaire: a rapid and robust measure of perceived functioning. Int J Soc Psychiatry 51(3):265–282
Acknowledgments
Assistance with initial data management was provided by Dr. James Stanley, Wellington School of Medicine, Otago University. Development of the initial data collection tools and the methodology was provided by WIT and Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga. Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga, assisted with data collection, has reviewed this paper and is happy for it being submitted for publication. Funding for the collection of the data was provided by the Hawke’s Bay Medical Research Fund.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Questions asked in relation to CTOs
Do you find a CTO ‘traumatic’? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Are your rights are violated by a CTO? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does a CTO give you a “safety net”? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does a CTO make it more difficult to get on with your doctor? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does a CTO make it harder to trust your doctor? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does going to court upset you? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Do you like being on a CTO? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Do you only take your medication because of the CTO? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does the CTO interfere with your social life? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does the CTO stop you from working? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does the CTO make you unhappy? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does the CTO help with your care? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Does the CTO protect you? | Yes | A little | No opinion | Not Really | No |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newton-Howes, G., Lacey, C.J. & Banks, D. Community treatment orders: the experiences of Non-Maori and Maori within mainstream and Maori mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49, 267–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0734-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0734-7