Abstract
Introduction
Assertive outreach (AO) is a required component of services for people with severe mental illness in England. However, the claims to its effectiveness have been contested and the relationships between team organisation, including model fidelity, the use of mental health interventions and outcomes for service users remain unclear.
Method
Three-year follow up of 33 AO teams was conducted using standardised measures of model fidelity and mental health interventions, and of current location and a range of outcomes for service users (n = 628). Predictors of the number of hospital admissions, mental health and social functioning at T2, and discharge from the team as ‘improved’ were modelled using multivariate regression analyses.
Results
Teams had moderate mean ratings of fidelity to the AO model. All rated highly on the core intervention modalities of engagement, assessment and care co-ordination, but ratings for psychosocial interventions were comparatively low. Two-thirds (462) of service users were still in AO and data were returned on 400 (87%). There was evidence of small improvements in mental health and social functioning and a reduction in the mean number of hospital admissions in the previous 2 years (from 2.09 to 1.39). Poor outcomes were predicted variously by service users’ characteristics, previous psychiatric history, poor collaboration with services, homelessness and dual diagnosis. Fidelity to the AO model did not emerge as a predictor of outcome, but the team working for extended hours was associated with more frequent in-patient admissions and less likelihood of discharge from AO. Supportive interventions in daily living, together with the team’s use of family and psychological interventions were also associated with poorer outcomes. Possible explanations for these unexpected findings are considered.
Conclusion
AO appears to have been quite successful in keeping users engaged over a substantial period and to have an impact in supporting many people to live in the community and to avoid the necessity of psychiatric hospital admission. However, teams should focus on those with a history of hospital admissions, who do not engage well with services and for whom outcomes are less good. Psychosocial interventions should be applied. The relationship between model fidelity, team organisation, mental health interventions and outcomes is not straightforward and deserves further study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Health (2001) Mental health policy implementation guide. Department of Health, London
Killaspy H, Bebbington P, Blizard R, Johnson S, Nolan F, Pilling S, King M (2006) The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in North London. BMJ 332:815–820
Killaspy H, Kingett S, Bebbington P, Blizard R, Johnson S, Nolan F, Pilling S, King M (2009) Randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment: 3-year outcomes. Br J Psychiatry 195:81–82
Burns T, Catty J, Dash M, Roberts C, Lockwood A, Marshall M (2007) Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression. BMJ 335:336–340
Wright C, Burns T, James P, Billings J, Johnson S, Muijen M, Priebe S, Ryrie I, Watts J, White I (2003) Assertive outreach teams in London: models of operation Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part I. Br J Psychiatry 183:132–138
Priebe S, Fakhoury W, Watts J, Bebbington P, Billings J, Burns T, Johnson S, Muijen M, Ryrie I, Wright C (2004) Characteristics of teams, staff and patients: associations with outcomes of patients in assertive outreach. Br J Psychiatry 185:306–311
Paxton R, Kennedy P, Carpenter J (2006) Research in the real world. Psychiatr Bull 30:43–45
Bak M, van Os J, Delespaul P, de Bie A, a′ Campo J, Poddighe G, Drukker M (2007) An observational, ‘‘real life’’ trial of the introduction of assertive community treatment in a geographically defined area using clinical rather than service use outcome criteria. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:125–130
Schneider J, Brandon T, Wooff D, Carpenter J, Paxton R (2006) Assertive outreach: policy and reality. Psychiatr Bull 30:89–94
Teague GB, Bond GR, Drake RE (1998) Program fidelity in community treatment: development and use of a measure. Am J Orthopsychiatr 628:216–232
De Jong A (2000) Development of the International Classification of Mental Health Care (ICMHC). Acta Psychiatr Scand 102(Suppl 405):8–13
Huxley P, Reilly S, Gater R, Robinshaw E, Harrison J, Mohamad H, Butler T, Windle B (2000) Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:312–317
Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1976) The Global Assessment Scale, a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:766–771
Wing J (1994) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: HoNOS field trials. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
R Development Core Team (2006). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 5 Mar 2010
Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. STATA Tech Bull 13:19–23
Rees A, Richards A, Shapiro D (2004) Utility of the HoNOS in measuring change in a community mental health care population. J Ment Health 13:295–303
Burns T (2007) The evolution of outcome measures in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 191(suppl. 50):s1–s6
Lloyd-Evans B, Slade M, Osborn D, Skinner R, Johnson S (2010) Developing and comparing methods for measuring the content of care in mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0192-4
Commander M, Sashidharan S, Rana T, Ratnayake T (2005) North Birmingham assertive outreach evaluation: patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:988–993
Kortrijk HE, Staring A, van Baars A, Mulder C (2010) Involuntary admission may support treatment outcome and motivation in patients receiving assertive community treatment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45:245–252
Acknowledgments
This study was facilitated and funded by the North East Assertive Outreach Practice and Research Consortium. Special thanks to its chair, Dr. Roger Paxton.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carpenter, J., Luce, A. & Wooff, D. Predictors of outcomes of assertive outreach teams: a 3-year follow-up study in North East England. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46, 463–471 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0211-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0211-5