Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social capital elite, excluded participators, busy working parents and aging, participating less: types of community participators and their mental health

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the prevalence and costs of mental health problems increasing, safe, effective and economically viable prevention and treatment strategies are urgently needed. Community participation is protectively linked to mental health and is considered a valid mental health promotion strategy. However, little consideration has been given to socio-demographically driven patterns of participation that would differentially affect the success of such a strategy. The aims of this study were to group and describe members of a socio–economically disadvantaged rural region according to patterns of community participation, report on their levels of social cohesion and psychological distress and reflect on policy implications. Participants were 963 community members, aged 19–97, randomly selected from a socio-economically disadvantaged coastal Australian region, who voluntarily completed an anonymous postal survey. Measures included (1) frequency of fourteen types of participation, (2) thoughts and feelings about each type, and (3) five aspects of social cohesion. Two-step cluster analysis was undertaken to derive groupings of respondents based on their socio-demographic characteristics and levels of and perceptions about their participation. Psychological distress was assessed for each group. Four distinct groupings of participants were identified: social capital elite; busy working parents; aging, participating less; and excluded participators. The last of these reported particularly poor participation, cohesion and psychological distress. For mental health promotion strategies to be effective, they must be tailored to the circumstances of intended recipients. This requires a sophisticated analysis of target groups. This study has shown that members of a socio–economically disadvantaged rural region may be described according to systematically varying patterns of socio-demographic characteristics, participation, social cohesion and distress. Policy-makers might consider (1) how and whether different groups might respond to the use of increased community participation as a mental health promotion strategy and (2) barriers that might have to be overcome in different groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adlaf EM, Ialomiteanu A (2000) Prevalence of problem gambling in adolescents: findings form the 1999 Ontario Student Drug Use Survey. Can J Psychiatry 45(8):752–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Almedom AM (2005) Social capital and mental health: an interdisciplinary review of primary evidence. Soc Sci Med 61(5):943–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alston M (2002) Social capital in rural Australia. Rural Soc 12(2):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews G, Slade T (2001) Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Aust N Z J Public Health 25(6):494–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baum FE, Bush RA, Modra CC, Murray CJ, Cox EM, Alexander KM, Potter RC (2000) Epidemiology of participation: an Australian community study. J Epidemiol Community Health 54(6):414–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez A (2003) The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berry HL, Rickwood DJ (2000) Measuring social capital at the individual level: personal social capital, values and psychological distress. Int J Ment Health Promot 2(3):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berry HL, Rodgers B (2003) Trust and distress in three generations of rural Australians. Australas Psychiatry 11(S):S131–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry HL, Rodgers B, Dear KBG (2007) Preliminary development and validation of an Australian community participation questionnaire: types of participation and associations with distress in a coastal community. Soc Sci Med 64(8):1719–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berry HL, Shipley M (2007) Longing to belong: personal social capital and psychological distress in a coastal Australian region. The Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry HL, Butterworth P, Caldwell TM, Rodgers B (2008). Contemporary Australian archetypes: different types of people, different needs, social policy Research Paper No. 32. Australian Government Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Canberra

  12. Berry HL (2007) Twelve types of Australians and their socio-economic, psychosocial and health characteristics, Social Policy Research Papers. Australian Government Department of Families Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Canberra

  13. Brownson RC, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride TD (2006) Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med 30(2):164–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buetow SA, Kerse NM (2001) Does reported health promotion activity neglect people with ill-health? Health Promot Int 16(1):73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamarck T, Hoberman HM (1985) Interpersonal support evaluation list. In: Sarason GS, Sarason BR (eds) Social support: theory, research and application. Martinus Nijhoff, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cummins LL, Bromiley P (1996) The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage Publications, California, pp 302–330

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Silva MJ, McKenzie K, Harpham T, Huttly SRA (2005) Social capital and mental illness: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 59(8):619–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Silva MJ, Huttly SR, Harpham T, Kenward MG (2007) Social capital and mental health: a comparative analysis of four low income countries. Soc Sci Med 64(1):5–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckert KA, Taylor AW, Wilkinson D (2004) Does health service utilisation vary by remoteness? South Australian population data and the accessibility and remoteness index of Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 28(5):426–432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farr J (2004) Social capital: a conceptual history. Polit Theory 32(1):6–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferlander S (2007) The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociol 50(2):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E (2002) Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan 17(1):106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hendry LB, Reid M (2000) Social relationships and health: the meaning of social connectedness and how it relates to health concerns for rural Scottish adolescents. J Adolesc 23(6):705–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heying CH (1997) Civic elites and corporate dislocation: an alternative explanation for declining civic engagement. Am Behav Sci 40:657–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hyyppa MT, Maki J (2003) Social participation and health in a community rich in stock of social capital. Health Educ Res 18(6):770–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iacono T, Davis R, Humphreys J, Chandler N (2003) GP and support people’s concerns and priorities for meeting the health care needs of individuals with developmental disabilities: a metropolitan and non-metropolitan comparison. J Intellect Dev Disabil 28(4):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inglehart R, et al. (1997) World values surveys: cumulative file for the first three waves. ICPSR Survey Data Archive, Ann Arbor

  28. Juvonen-Posti P, Kallanranta T, Eksyma SL, Piirainen K, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S (2002) Into work, through tailored paths: a two-year follow-up of the return-to-work rehabilitation and re-employment project. Int J Rehabil Res 25(4):313–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2001) Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med 78(3):458–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand S-LT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32(6):959–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuchukeeva A, John O’Loughlin J (2003) Civic engagement and democratic consolidation in Kyrgyzstan. Eurasian Geogr Econ 44(8):557–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kulkarni R, Kent J, Bennett M (2001) A strategy to promote mental well-being in Berkshire 2001–2010: Berkshire health promotion

  33. Lee RM, Draper M, Lee S (2001) Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: testing a mediator model. J Couns Psychol 48(3):310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mansyur C, Amick BC, Harrist RB, Franzini L (2008) Social capital, income inequality, and self-rated health in 45 countries. Soc Sci Med 66(1):43–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McAllister I (1998) Civic education and political knowledge in Australia. Aust J Polit Sci 33(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell AD, Bossert TJ (2007) Measuring dimensions of social capital: evidence from surveys in poor communities in Nicaragua. Soc Sci Med 64(1):50–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moore S, Haines V, Hawe P, Shiell A (2006) Lost in translation: a genealogy of the social capital concept in public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 60(8):729–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Murray G, Judd F, Jackson H, Fraser C, Komiti A, Hodgins G, Pattison P, Humphreys J, Robins G (2004) Rurality and mental health: the role of accessibility. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38(8):629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prince M, Harwood R, Thomas A, Mann A (1998) A prospective population-based cohort study of the effects of disablement and social milieu on the onset and maintenance of late-life depression. The Gospel Oak Project VII. Psychol Med 28:337–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy 6:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quine S, Kendig H, Russell C, Touchard D (2004) Health promotion for socially disadvantaged groups: The case of homeless older men in Australia. Health Promotion Int 19(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rich P (1999) American voluntarism, social capital, and political culture. The Annals 565(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Riise T, Lund A (2001) Prognostic factors in major depression: a long-term follow-up study of 323 patients. J Affect Disord 65(3):297–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sartorius N (2001) The economic and social burden of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 62(Suppl 15):8–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sartorius N (2003) Social capital and mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry 16(Suppl 2):S101–S105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schudson M (1996) What if civic life didn’t die? Am Prospect 25:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schwarz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–65

    Google Scholar 

  49. Skocpol T (2000) The Tocqueville problem: civic initiative in American Democracy. Teorija in Praksa 37(6):1132–1152

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smidt C (1999) Religion and civic engagement: a comparative analysis. Annals 565(1):176–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Turrell G, Oldenburg BF, Harris E, Jolley D (2004) Utilisation of general practitioner services by socio-economic disadvantage and geographic remoteness. Aust N Z J Public Health 28(2):152–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Uslaner EM, Conley RS (2003) Civic engagement and particularized trust: the ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. Am Polit Res 31(4):331–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wakefield SEL, Poland B (2005) Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development. Soc Sci Med 60(12):2819–2832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Waring T, Hazell T, Hazell P, Adams J (2000) Youth mental health promotion in the Hunter region. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 34:579–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Whitley R, McKenzie K (2005) Social capital and psychiatry: review of the literature. Harv Rev Psychiatry 13(2):71–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Young AF, Dobson AJ (2003) The decline in bulk-billing and increase in out-of-pocket costs for general practice consultations in rural areas of Australia, 1995–2001. Med J Aust 178(3):122–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 0200, Australia

    Helen Louise Berry MA, BSc, BAppPsych, PhD

Authors
  1. Helen Louise Berry MA, BSc, BAppPsych, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Louise Berry MA, BSc, BAppPsych, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berry, H.L. Social capital elite, excluded participators, busy working parents and aging, participating less: types of community participators and their mental health. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 43, 527–537 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0331-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0331-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation