Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need in treatment: what unmet needs can be met?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A useful way of operationalising treatment effects in routine outcome assessment data may be to assess the rate at which unmet needs at time point t change to met needs at time point t + 1.

Methods

Data were obtained from the local Cumulative Needs for Care Register (CNCR), a cumulative data set of needs (Camberwell Assessment of Need), psychopathology, well being and functioning of psychiatric patients living both inside and outside the hospital, in a circumscribed geographical area.

Results

In the group of relatively new patients, the number of met needs (sum score) increased over time. Higher unmet needs sum score predicted higher met needs at time point t + 1. Unmet needs in the areas of accommodation, household skills, self-care, safety to others (in new patients only), alcohol, drugs, money and benefits were associated with met needs on these items at time point t + 1, but there was no such association for occupation/daytime activities, psychotic symptoms, psychological distress and self-harm.

Conclusion

Treatment outcomes in psychiatric practice can be usefully tracked and quantified using the rate of change from unmet to met needs. Needs in the area of the ability to live independently may represent outcomes that are more sensitive to treatment effects than needs in the realm of psychopathology and daytime activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bak M, Drukker M, Van Os J, Delespaul PAEG (2005) Hospital comorbidity bias and the concept of schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:817–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delespaul PAEG, Bak ML, Van Os J (2007) Handleiding Zorgmonitor (5e uitgave) Maastricht. Universiteit Maastricht—PMS Vijverdal—RIAGG Maastricht—RIBW Heuvelland—Maasvallei, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delespaul PAEG, Van Os J (2005) (F)ACT-planning met een schone lei voor mensen met een ernstige psychiatrische aandoening. In: Kroon C (ed) Assertive community treatment. Cure & Care Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 19–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansson L, Bjorkman T (2007) Are factors associated with subjective quality of life in people with severe mental illness consistent over time? A 6-year follow-up study. Qual Life Res 16:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Honkonen T, Stengard E, Virtanen M, Salokangas RK (2007) Employment predictors for discharged schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joska J, Flisher AJ (2005) The assessment of need for mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Korkeila J, Heikkila J, Hansson L, Sorgaard KW, Vahlberg T, Karlsson H (2005) Structure of needs among persons with schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, Malchiodi F, Salvi G, Parabiaghi A, Tansella M, Ruggeri M (2005) Listening to patients’ needs to improve their subjective quality of life. Psychol Med 35:1655–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leese M, Johnson S, Slade M, Parkman S, Kelly F, Phelan M, Thornicroft G (1998) User perspective on needs and satisfaction with mental health services. PRiSM Psychosis Study. 8. Br J Psychiatry 173:409–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCrone P, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Schene AH, Knudsen HC, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Lasalvia A, Padfield S, White IR, Griffiths G (2000) Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need—European Version. EPSILON study 6. European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs. Br J Psychiatry Suppl:s34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCrone P, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Schene A, Knudsen HC, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Tansella M, Becker T (2001) A comparison of needs of patients with schizophrenia in five European countries: the EPSILON Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 103:370–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McGurk SR, Mueser KT (2003) Cognitive functioning and employment in severe mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis 191:789–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phelan M, Slade M, Thornicroft G, Dunn G, Holloway F, Wykes T, Strathdee G, Loftus L, McCrone P, Hayward P (1995) The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 167:589–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A, Tansella M, Bonetto C, Abate M, Thornicroft G, Allevi L, Ognibene P (2004) Heterogeneity of outcomes in schizophrenia: 3-year follow-up of treated prevalent cases. Br J Psychiatry 184:48–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slade M, McCrone P, Kuipers E, Leese M, Cahill S, Parabiaghi A, Priebe S, Thornicroft G (2006) Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 189:330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Loftus L, Phelan M, Wykes T (1999) CAN: Camberwell Assessment of Need. A comprehensive needs assessment tool for people with severe mental illness. Gaskell, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel analysis, an introduction to basic and advanced modeling. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. StataCorp (2006) Stata statistical software. Stata Corporation, College

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Os J, Delespaul PAEG, Radstake S, Hilwig MM, Bak MLFJ, Driessen G (2001) Kernparameters ter evaluatie van een zorgprogramma voor Psychose. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 56:952–966

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Os J, Drukker M, à Campo J, Meijer J, Bak M, Delespaul PAEG (2006) Validation of remission criteria for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 163:2000–2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventura J, Nuechterlein KH, Subotnik KL, Gutkind D, Gilbert EA (2000) Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal components analysis of the 24-item brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychiatry Res 97:129–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wennström E, Wiesel FA (2006) The Camberwell assessment of need as an outcome measure in routine mental health care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by ZonMW, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. The authors are grateful to all mental health care workers in the region, who administered CNCM-forms for use in the individual treatment of patients, with data collection as a side effect.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjan Drukker PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drukker, M., van Dillen, K., Bak, M. et al. The use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need in treatment: what unmet needs can be met?. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 43, 410–417 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0301-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0301-1

Key words

Navigation