Abstract
Background
The public tends to have different views from professionals about the treatment of mental disorders. It has been proposed that these differences do not simply reflect a lack of knowledge about treatments, but also the operation of pre-existing general belief systems about health interventions. The present study uses factor analysis to examine the structure of public beliefs about interventions for depression and schizophrenia, using case vignettes that vary in severity or stage of illness.
Methods
In a national survey of 3,998 Australian adults, respondents were presented with one of four vignettes: depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia. Respondents were asked about the likely helpfulness or harmfulness of a wide range of interventions for the person in the vignette. Methods suitable for ordinal data were used to explore a range of factor analytic solutions. Once identified, the location of participants on each factor was estimated by calculating a mean score for items loading highly on that factor. These scale means were compared between subgroups of participants.
Results
Four factors were found. Three of these—Lifestyle, Psychological and Medical—corresponded to previously found factors. An additional factor named Information-seeking was defined by items that had not been included in earlier research. These items concerned obtaining information or advice from a variety of sources including the internet, books and health educators. Differences on the factors were a function of socio-demographic factors and ability to identify the condition portrayed in the vignette. However, the magnitude of these differences was small. Differences between factors were more pronounced, with mean ratings on the Medical factor falling between harmful and neutral, while mean ratings on other factors lay between neutral and helpful.
Conclusion
The public tends to favour psychological and lifestyle interventions over medical ones. These beliefs do not reflect specific knowledge about the effectiveness of particular treatments, but rather general commitments to broad classes of treatment that are applied irrespective of the type of mental disorder. Educational campaigns to improve public knowledge about treatments will need to take account of these pre-existing belief systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1996) Public attitude towards psychiatric treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 94:326–336
Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (2004) Public attitudes towards psychotropic drugs: have there been any changes in recent years? Pharmacopsychiatry 37:152–156
Fischer W, Goerg D, Zbinden E, Guimon J (1999) Determining factors and the effects of attitudes towards psychotropic medication. In: Guimon J, Fischer W, Sartorius N (eds) The image of madness: the public facing mental illness and psychiatric treatment. Karger, Basel, pp 162–186
Goldney RD, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH (2001) Mental health literacy: an impediment to the optimum treatment of major depression in the community. J Affect Disord 64:277–284
Haslam N (2005) Dimensions of folk psychiatry. Rev Gen Psychol 9:35–37
Hillert A, Sandmann J, Ehmig SC, Weisbecker H, Kepplinger HM, Benkert O (1999) The general public's cognitive and emotional perception of mental illness: an alternative to attitude-research. In: Guimon J, Fischer W, Sartorius N (eds) The image of madness: the public facing mental illness and psychiatric treatment. Karger, Basel, pp 56–71
Hugo CJ, Boshoff DEL, Traut A, Zungu-Dirwayi N, Stein DJ (2003) Community attitude toward and knowledge of mental illness in South Africa. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:715–719
Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Pollitt P (1997a) “Mental health literacy”: a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust 166:182–186
Jorm AF, Korten AE, Rodgers B, Pollitt P, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Jiao Z (1997b) Belief systems of the general public concerning the appropriate treatments for mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 32:468–473
Jorm AF, Angermeyer M, Katschnig H (2000a) Public knowledge of and attitudes to mental disorders: a limiting factor in the optimal use of treatment services. In: Andrews G, Henderson S (eds) Unmet need in psychiatry: problems, resources, responses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–413
Jorm AF, Christensen H, Medway J, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Rodgers B (2000b) Public belief systems about the helpfulness of interventions for depression : associations with history of depression and professional help-seeking. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:211–219
Jorm AF, Christensen H, Griffiths KM (2005a) The public's ability to recognize mental disorders and their beliefs about treatment: changes in Australia over 8 years. Aust N Z J Psychiatry (in press)
Jorm AF, Blewitt KA, Griffiths K, Kitchener BA, Parslow RA (2005b) Mental health first aid responses of the public: results from an Australian national survey. BMC Psychiatry 5:9
Jorm AF, Christensen H, Griffiths KM (2005c) The impact of beyondblue: the national depression initiative on the Australian public's recognition of depression and beliefs about treatments. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 39:248–254
McKeon P, Carrick S (1991) Public attitudes to depression: a national survey. Ir J Psychol Med 8:116–121
Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998) MPlus. User's guide, 3rd edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA
Paykel ES, Hart D, Priest RG (1998) Changes in public attitudes to depression during the Defeat Depression Campaign. Br J Psychiatry 173:519–522
Priest RG, Vize C, Roberts A, Roberts M, Tylee A (1996) Lay people's attitudes to treatment of depression: results of opinion poll for Defeat Depression Campaign just before its launch. BMJ 313:858–859
Acknowledgements
This study is part of the Australia–Japan Partnership, which is an agreement between the governments of the two countries for joint projects in areas of health. Funding for the survey was provided by the Australian Department of Health and Ageing, a National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant and ‘beyondblue: the national depression initiative’. We thank Kelly Blewitt for her assistance with the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jorm, A.F., Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H. et al. Structure of beliefs about the helpfulness of interventions for depression and schizophrenia. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 877–883 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0991-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0991-x