Abstract
Background
Although residential facilities (RFs) have largely replaced mental hospitals (MHs) in most developed countries for the long-term residential care of severely impaired patients, the process of care in RFs has not been well studied. The aim of this paper is to investigate the process of care in 265 RFs, representing 19.3% of all RFs in Italy, and to devise a classification of RFs based on process characteristics.
Methods
Structured interviews were conducted with the manager and staff of each RF. Residents were evaluated using standardized rating instruments.
Results
Most RFs had specific admission criteria, with one third having a waiting list that averaged about 3 months. There was no formal limitation to the length of stay in three quarters of RFs, and turnover rates were very low. Although a homelike atmosphere was found in many RFs, most facilities had restrictive rules on patients’ daily lives and behaviours. RFs carried out several external activities targeted at integrating patients within the local community. Standardized assessment instruments and written treatment plans were rarely used. A cluster analysis based on the levels of restrictiveness and the standardization of the process of care classified RFs into five groups that differed with respect to daily staff coverage, size, geographical distribution and proportion of former MH residents. No significant intercluster differences were associated with the current clinical and psychosocial characteristics of residents, or with several other outcome variables.
Conclusions
This study provides naturalistic evidence of the heterogeneity of the process of residential care on a large scale. Future efforts should focus on developing an empirical classification of RFs, as well as on national and international standards of care and staffing to address patients’ needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubry TD et al (1995) Public attitudes and intentions regarding tenants of community mental health residences who are neighbours. Community Ment Health J 31:39–52
Brunt D, Hansson L (2002) A comparison of the psychosocial environment of two types of residences for persons with severe mental illness: small congregate community residences and psychiatric inpatient settings. Int J Soc Psychiatry 48:243–252
Carling PJ (1993) Housing and supports for persons with mental illness: emerging approaches to research and practice. Hosp/Community Psychiatry 44:439–449
Cook JR (1998) Interactions between group homes and neighbours: neighbour preferences. J Behav Health Serv Res 25:425–436
Cournos F (1987) The impact of environmental factors on outcome in residential programmes. Hosp/Community Psychiatry 38:848–852
Cullen D et al (1997) Community and hospital residential care: a comparative evaluation. Br J Psychol Med 14:92–98
Cutler DL (1986) Community residential options for the chronically mentally ill. Community Ment Health J 22:61–73
Dash P et al (2003) Increasing the impact of health services research. BMJ 327:1351–1359
de Girolamo G, Cozza M (2000) The Italian psychiatric reform: a 20-year perspective. Int J Law Psychiatry 23:197–214
de Girolamo G et al (2002) Residential care in Italy: a national survey of non-hospital facilities. Br J Psychiatry 181:220–225
de Girolamo G et al (2005) The severely mentally ill in residential facilities: a national survey in Italy. Psychol Med 35:421–431
Drachman D (1981) A residential continuum for the chronically mentally ill: a Markov probability model. Eval Health Prof 4:93–104
Friedrich RM et al (1999) Family and client perspectives on alternative residential settings for persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 50:509–514
Geller JL, Fisher WH (1993) The linear continuum of transitional residences: debunking the myth. Am J Psychiatry 150:1070–1076
Goering P et al (1992) Social networks of resident in supportive housing. Community Ment Health J 28:199–214
Grigoletti L et al (2004) I costi delle strutture residenziali psichiatriche italiane. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 4:262–269
Gudeman JE, Shore MF (1984) Beyond deinstitutionalization. A new class of facilities for the mentally ill. N Engl J Med 311:832–836
Hull JT, Thompson JC (1981) Predicting adaptive functioning among mentally ill persons in community settings. Am J Community Psychol 9:247–268
Humberstone V (2002) The experiences of people with schizophrenia living in supported accommodation: a qualitative study using grounded theory methodology. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36:367–372
Jones J (2000) Mental health care reforms in Britain and Italy since 1950: a cross-national comparative study. Health Place 6:171–187
Lucca AM, Allen GJ (2001) A statewide assessment of rehabilitation programmes: general characteristics and services. Psychiatr Rehabil J 24:205–213
Macry P (1997) Rethinking a stereotype: territorial differences and family models in the modernization of Italy. J Mod Ital Stud 2:188–214
Marino S et al (1996) The provision of psychiatric care in Southern Italy. Results from the ‘Psychiatric in Southern Italy’s Services’ (DE PISIS) survey. Int J Soc Psychiatry 42:181–192
McCarthy J, Nelson G (1991) An evaluation of supportive housing for current and former psychiatric patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 42:1254–1256
Mollica RF (1983) From asylum to community. The threatened disintegration of public psychiatry. N Engl J Med 308:367–373
Moos RH et al (2000) Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings: determinants and roles as predictors of one-year treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychol 56:449–461
Moos RH et al (2002) Global Assessment of Functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 53:730–737
Nagy MP et al (1988) Effects of facility characteristics on the social adjustment of mentally ill residents of board-and-care homes. Hosp Community Psychiatry 39:1281–1286
Nelson G et al (1992) Social network transactions of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med 34:433–445
O’Driscoll C, Leff J (1993) The TAPS project. 8: Design of the research study on the long-stay patients. Br J Psychiatry 162(suppl 19):18–24
Owen C et al (1996) Housing accommodation preferences of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Serv 47:628–632
Progetto obiettivo ‘Tutela della salute mentale (1998–2000)’. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 274:4–13 (24 November 1999)
Segal SP, Kotler PL (1993) Sheltered care residence: ten-year personal outcomes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 63:80–91
Shepherd G et al (1996) Residential care in hospital and in the community—quality of care and quality of life. Br J Psychiatry 168:448–456
Solomon J, Fioritti A (2002) Motivational intervention as applied to systems change: the case of dual diagnosis. Subst Use Misuse 37:1833–1851
Tanzman B (1993) An overview of surveys of mental health consumers’ preferences for housing and support services. Hosp Community Psychiatry 44:450–455
Thornicroft G, Bebbington P (1989) Deinstitutionalisation—from hospital closure to services development. Br J Psychiatry 155:739–753
Timko C et al (2003) Trends in acute mental health care: comparing psychiatric and substance abuse treatment programmes. J Behav Health Serv Res 30:145–160
Trieman N, Leff J (1996) The TAPS projects. 36: The most difficult to place psychiatric in-patients. Outcome one year after relocation. Br J Psychiatry 169:289–292
UK Department of Mental Health (2002) Dual diagnosis good practice guide. UK Department of Health, London
WHO (1996) Psychosocial rehabilitation: a consensus statement. Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHO, Geneva (Publication WHO/MNH/MND/96.2)
Wing JK, Furlong R (1986) A haven for the severely disabled within the context of a comprehensive psychiatric community service. Br J Psychiatry 149:449–457
Wing JK et al (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales Community Psychiatry (HoNOS) research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by a grant from the Italian National Institute of Health. Special thanks are due to Geoff Shepherd, Ph.D., and Richard Warner, M.D., for their very helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
The PROGRES Group includes: National Coordinators: G. de Girolamo, A. Picardi, P. Morosini (National Mental Health Project, National Institute of Health); Biostatistician: R. Micciolo (University of Trento); Regional Coordinators: P. Argentino, M. Casacchia, P. Ciliberti, G. Civenti, A. Colotto, G. Dell’Acqua, W. Di Munzio, G. Fagnano, A. Fioritti, N. Longhin, M. Miceli, M. Nicotera, M. Pisetta, R. Putzolu, E. Rossi, M. E. Rotunno, G. Borsetti, D. Semisa, R. Tomasi, P. Tulli, E. Zanalda; Researchers: C. Barbini, F. Basile, G. Bazzacco, R. Bracco, A. Calvarese, G. Canuso, E. Caroppo, L. Caserta, M. Colangione, S. Damiani, T. De Donatis, F. Di Donato, V. Di Michele, R. Esposito, M. Facchini, S. Ferraro, P. Fracchiolla, P. Gabriele, D. Gallicchio, G. Giardina, A. Greco, F. Grilletti, S. Guzzo, A. M. Lerario, M. R. Marinelli, C. Marino, E. Monzani, F. Picoco, L. Pinciaroli, C. A. Rossetti, P. Rubatta, G. Santone, F. Scorpiniti, V. Scrofani, M. Stefani, A. Svettini, A. Zaffarano, M. Cellini, A. Galli, K. Pesaresi, G. Pitzalis, L. Tarantino; Scientific Consultants: F. Amaddeo, I. Falloon
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
for the PROGRES Group., Santone, G., de Girolamo, G. et al. The process of care in residential facilities. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 540–550 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0922-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0922-1