Skip to main content
Log in

Epidemiological theory, decision theory and mental health services research

  • SPECIAL ISSUE
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Background:

Mathematical models describing the epidemiology of major depression are potentially useful for epidemiological analyses, as decision support tools and in economic analyses. The objective of this project was to develop a Markov model based on epidemiological theory that may be useful for decision analysis and health services research.

Methods:

Longitudinal data from a Canadian national survey, the National Population Health Survey (NPHS), were used. The NPHS has collected longitudinal data on a cohort of 17,262 subjects since 1994. The analysis employed a Markov tunnel in order to model the dependence of recovery probabilities on episode duration.

Results:

Episode incidence ranged between 6.2 % per year in women under 35 to 0.26 % in men over the age of 65.A greater proportion of subjects over 35 years old reported episodes lasting more than 26 weeks. The probability of recovery declined with increasing episode duration, independently of sex. Under steady-state assumptions, a Markov model integrating these parameters predicted a point prevalence of approximately 2% in women and 1% in men under the age of 55. In older age groups, the predicted point prevalence declined in both sexes.

Conclusions:

These models support the hypothesis that sex differences in major depression prevalence are due primarily to differences in incidence rather than episode length. These results also indicate that there is no meaningful “central tendency” describing the distribution of episode length in major depression episode. Estimates of mean episode duration represent an intermixing of frequent brief episodes with infrequent protracted episodes. This finding may have important policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunink MG (2002) Presidential address: proactive decision making. Med Decis Making 22:182–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldman L, Coxson P, Hunink MGM, Goldman PA, Tosteson ANA, Mittleman MA, Williams L, Weinstein MC (1999) The relative influence of secondary versus primary prevention using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:768–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosteson ANA, Weinstein MC, Hunink MGM, Mittleman MA, Williams LW, Goldman PA, Goldman L (1997) Cost-effectiveness of populationwide educational approaches to reduce serum cholesterol levels. Circulation 95:24–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patten SB, Lee RC (2003) Towards a dynamic model of major depression epidemiology. Epidemiologia e Psychiatria Sociale 13:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patten SB, Lee RC (2004) Refining Estimates of Major Depression Incidence and Episode Duration in Canada using a Monte Carlo Markov Model. Med Decis Making 24:559–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barendregt JJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, Vos T, Murray CJL (2003) A generic model for the assessment of disease epidemiology: the computational basis of DisMod II. Population Health Metrics. http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/1/1/4

  8. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen HU (1998) The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 7:171–185

    Google Scholar 

  9. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (1994) Cary, NC: The SAS Institute

  10. Hollenberg JP (1984) Markov cycle trees: a new representation for complex Markov processes. Med Decis Making 4:529

    Google Scholar 

  11. Regier DA, Boyd JH, Burke JD, Myers JK, Kramer M, Robins LN, George LK, Karno M, Lucke BZ (1988) One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States. Based on five epidemiological catchment area sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45:977–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blazer DG, Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Swartz MS (1994) The prevalence and distribution of Major Depression in a national community sample: the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Psychiatry 151:979–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Üstün TB, Kessler RC (2002) Global burden of depressive disorders: the issue of duration. Br J Psychiatry 181:181–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spijker J, de Graaf R, Bijl RV, Beekman ATF, Ormel J, Nolen WA (2002) Duration of major depressive episodes in the general population: results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Br J Psychiatry 181:208–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendler KS, Walters EE, Kessler RC (1997) The prediction of length of major depressive episodes: results from an epidemiological sample of female twins. Psychol Med 27:107–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott B. Patten MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patten, S.B., Lee, R.C. Epidemiological theory, decision theory and mental health services research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39, 893–898 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0872-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0872-z

Key words

Navigation