Introduction

Chronic exposure to elevated glucose levels exerts toxic effects in beta cells, a concept known as glucotoxicity [1]. Glucotoxicity contributes to the deterioration of functional beta cell mass in type 2 diabetes. However, the precise mechanisms involved are not understood.

Hypoxia occurs when demand for oxygen exceeds supply leading to a drop in tissue oxygen pressure (pO2). Beta cells are sensitive to hypoxic stress because their function depends heavily on the acceleration of mitochondrial metabolism upon glucose stimulation to generate ATP [2]. Glucose stimulation of beta cell oxygen consumption generates intracellular hypoxia leading to activation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and upregulation of HIF-target genes in rodent and human islets (reviewed in [1]). The presence of hypoxia in vivo in the islets of animal models of type 2 diabetes [38] supports a role for hypoxic stress in beta cell apoptosis. Moreover, severe hypoxia in islet grafts contributes to beta cell apoptosis in the early post-transplantation period [9, 10]. However, the mechanisms underlying the deleterious effects of hypoxia in beta cells are unclear.

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is highly active in beta cells due to heavy engagement in the synthesis, processing and secretion of insulin. This function relies on a finely tuned adaptive unfolded protein response (UPR) [11]. The accumulation of unfolded proteins (ER stress), occurring as a result of an imbalance between ER folding capacity and demand, triggers the UPR via three main sensors, namely double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), inositol requiring kinase 1 (IRE1) and activating transcription factor (ATF) 6. Activation of PERK and the ensuing phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (EIF2A) leads to rapid and transient reduction in global protein synthesis to attenuate ER load. IRE1 triggers the unconventional splicing of Xbp1 mRNA generating X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1s) transcription factor. XBP1s, together with ATF6, stimulates the expression of genes that enhance ER capacity as well as the degradation of unfolded proteins. However, irresolvable ER stress triggers apoptosis via several effectors including c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), DNA-damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3; also known as CHOP/GADD153), ATF3 and Tribbles homolog 3 (TRB3) [1113]. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that a progressive decline in the adaptive UPR characterises beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes [1416] as well as in islet transplantation [17]. Therefore, knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms controlling the adaptive UPR is crucial.

In the present study, we demonstrate for the first time that hypoxia downregulates the adaptive UPR specifically in beta cells. We show that inhibition of the adaptive UPR is associated with reduced ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking and beta cell death during hypoxic stress. Mechanistically, we show that hypoxia mediates these responses via JNK and DDIT3 activation, but independently of HIF1α. Our novel findings suggest that hypoxia may provide a cellular mechanism for failure of the adaptive UPR during the progressive loss of functional beta cell mass in type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Reagents

Control Non-Targeting and ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool small interfering (si)RNAs and transfection reagent DharmaFECT3 were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Lafayette, CO, USA). JNK inhibitor (JNKi) II SP600125 and NanoJuice transfection reagents were from Merck (Kilsyth, VIC, Australia).

Mice

C57BL/KsJ db/db mice and their age-matched lean control mice (C57BL/KsJ) were taken from the Garvan Institute breeding colony (Australian BioResources, Moss Vale, NSW, Australia), which was originally obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (BKS.Cg-Dock7 m +/+ Lepr db/J; Bar Harbor, ME, USA). For islet culture [14], 8–10 week-old C57BL/6 J mice were taken from the Garvan Institute breeding colony, which was derived from The Jackson Laboratory colony that harbours an Nnt mutation. Islets were isolated as previously described [14]. Some experiments were performed on a subset of mice used in our previous study [14]. All experiments were approved by the Garvan Institute/St. Vincent’s Hospital Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee.

Cell culture and treatment

MIN6 beta cells (P26-39) [18] and MEF cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 25 mmol/l glucose, 10 mmol/l HEPES, 10% FCS (vol./vol.), 50 units/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin in the presence of normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2) using hypoxic chambers (Billups-Rothenberg, Del Mar, CA, USA). Cells were transfected with control, Ddit3, Hif1a or Hspa5 siRNA. Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (HSPA5) expression vectors [18] were transfected into cells using NanoJuice transfection reagent. JNKi (10 μmol/l) was used to inhibit JNK activation. Cell death was determined with the use of a Cell Death Detection ELISA (Roche Diagnostics, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) [19].

Real-time RT-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR was performed as previously described [14]. Primer sequences are listed in Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM) Table 1. The value obtained for each specific gene product was normalised to the control gene cyclophilin A and expressed as a fold change of the value in control condition. Xbp1 mRNA splicing measurement was performed as previously described [19].

Protein analysis

Western blotting and immunostaining were performed as previously described [7, 20]. Western blot bands were quantified by densitometry and normalised to total protein or loading control (actin, tubulin or 14-3-3). Antibodies are listed in ESM Table 2. For immunofluorescence experiments, images were acquired using Leica SP8 confocal microscope.

Trafficking assay

ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking was assessed using the temperature-sensitive mutant vesicular stomatitis viral glycoprotein (VSVG) assay [21, 22]. MIN6 cells seeded on coverslips were transfected with VSVG protein tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP). Cells were cultured in the presence of 20% or 1% O2 for 24 h at 40°C to retain the VSVG in the ER. After addition of cycloheximide (20 μmol/l) to prevent novel VSVG synthesis, trafficking was commenced by transfer to the permissive temperature of 32°C. VSVG localisation was scored using confocal images according to the scale: 1, exclusively ER; 2, mostly ER with some Golgi; 3, equivalent ER and Golgi; 4, mostly Golgi with some ER; 5 exclusively Golgi [22].

Statistical analysis

Results are means ± SEM for the indicated number of experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA and a post test of Newman–Keuls or two-way ANOVA and a post test of Bonferroni.

Results

Hypoxia-response genes are upregulated in the islets of diabetic, but not in prediabetic, db/db mice

In db/db mice, blood glucose levels were increased at 16 weeks (average blood glucose levels: control 8.1 ± 0.5, n = 9; db/db 26.0 ± 1.8 mmol/l, n = 7; p < 0.001) but not at 6 weeks of age (control 8.5 ± 0.2, n = 16; db/db 9.1 ± 0.3 mmol/l, n = 8; not significant) compared with age-matched lean C57BL/KsJ control mice [14]. The mRNA levels of hypoxia-response genes Adm, Tpi1, Gapdh and Eno1 were markedly upregulated in vivo in the islets of diabetic db/db mice in comparison with age-matched control mice (Fig. 1a–d). In contrast, there were no significant changes in hypoxia-response genes in the islets of prediabetic db/db mice (Fig. 1a–d). We have previously demonstrated the time-dependent downregulation of UPR genes is important for adaptation to ER stress in the islets of diabetic db/db mice [14]. Taken together, our studies demonstrate a novel in vivo association between islet hypoxia and the failure of the adaptive UPR in diabetic mice.

Fig. 1
figure 1

HIF-target gene mRNA levels are upregulated in the islets of diabetic, but not prediabetic, db/db mice. Changes in the mRNA levels of Adm, Tpi1, Gapdh and Eno1 (ad) in the islets of control C57BL/KsJ (Ctrl, white bars, 6 and 16 weeks of age), prediabetic db/db (grey bars, 6 weeks of age) and diabetic db/db (black bars, 16 weeks of age) mice. n = 8–14 animals per group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs control at the same age

Hypoxia inhibits adaptive UPR gene expression in beta cells

MIN6 cells were treated with normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2) for 24 h. Hypoxia markedly reduced Xbp1 mRNA splicing as well as the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes, including chaperones Hspa5 (Bip) and Hsp90b1 (Grp94) and the peptidyl prolyl isomerase Fkbp11 (Table 1). In contrast, hypoxia strongly upregulated the mRNA levels of apoptotic genes Ddit3, Atf3 and Trb3 (Table 1). As expected, hypoxia strongly upregulated the mRNA levels of HIF-target genes Adm, Aldoa, Hmox1 and Tpi1 (Table 1). In agreement with these findings, hypoxia reduced the protein levels of XBP1s by more than 90%, whereas phosphorylated IRE1A was unchanged (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, the protein levels of full-length and cleaved ATF6 were reduced by about 20% and 50%, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Furthermore, the protein levels of HSPA5 and heat shock 90 kDa protein beta (HSP90B1) were reduced by more than 50% and 70%, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Moreover, hypoxia significantly reduced PERK phosphorylation, whereas EIF2A phosphorylation was increased (Fig. 2a, c) suggesting possible activation of the integrated stress response (ISR) and an upstream EIF2A kinase other than PERK [23]. We therefore checked phosphorylation of PKR and found it was increased by hypoxia (Fig. 2a, c). Finally, hypoxia markedly increased pro-apoptotic effectors including DDIT3 and cleaved caspase 3 protein levels and JNK1/2 phosphorylation in association with increased cell death (Fig. 2a, c and d).

Table 1 Hypoxia reduced the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes in MIN6 cellsa
Fig. 2
figure 2

Hypoxia decreases adaptive UPR protein expression and upregulates pro-apoptotic protein expression and apoptosis. MIN6 cells were cultured for 24 h in the presence of normoxia (N, 20% O2, white bars) or hypoxia (H, 1% O2, black bars). Changes in (ac) protein levels and (d) apoptosis. n = 3–5 experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia. Cl., cleaved

The effects of hypoxia on the adaptive UPR were confirmed in isolated primary mouse islets. Hypoxia (1% O2 for 12 h) significantly downregulated Fkbp11, the chaperone Dnajc3 (p58 IPK) and the co-chaperone Dnajb9, and tended to reduce Hspa5 and the protein disulfide isomerase Pdia4 (Erp72) (Table 2). In contrast, hypoxia strongly upregulated the mRNA levels of apoptotic genes Ddit3, Atf3 and Trb3 as well as HIF-target genes in mouse islets (Table 2). Analysis of dispersed mouse islets exposed to hypoxia for 24 h revealed a marked downregulation of KDEL-containing ER proteins in beta cells (Fig. 3). The anti-KDEL antibody detects HSPA5, HSP90B1 and protein disulfide isomerase associated 6 (ESM Fig. 1).

Table 2 Hypoxia reduced the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes in mouse isletsa
Fig. 3
figure 3

Hypoxia decreases KDEL-containing ER proteins in primary beta cells. Immunostaining of KDEL in dispersed mouse islets cultured for 24 h in the presence of normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2). Images are representative of three experiments. Scale bar, 10 μm

To assess whether the effects of hypoxia on the UPR in beta cells were cell-specific, we performed studies using MEF cells (exposed to 20% or 1% O2 for 24 h). We found that, in opposition to findings in beta cells, hypoxia significantly increased the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes Hspa5, Hsp90b1, Fkbp11 and Pdia4 in MEF cells (ESM Fig. 2b). Apoptotic and HIF-target genes were also increased (ESM Fig. 2a,c). These findings suggest that hypoxia activates canonical ER stress response pathways in MEF cells and that its inhibitory effects on the adaptive UPR are specific in beta cells.

Hypoxia time-dependently inhibits the adaptive UPR without transient activation in beta cells

Hypoxia time-dependently decreased the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes without detection of transient activation (Fig. 4a–d). On the other hand, hypoxia time-dependently increased the mRNA levels of Ddit3 (Fig. 4e). In association with the changes in the adaptive UPR, XBP1 protein levels were strongly and rapidly reduced (Fig. 4f, ESM Fig. 3). ATF6c protein levels were also downregulated with time (Fig. 4f, ESM Fig. 3), whereas EIF2A phosphorylation and cleaved caspase 3 and DDIT3 protein levels were progressively increased (Fig. 4f, ESM Fig. 3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hypoxia time-dependently decreases adaptive UPR gene expression without transient activation, while increasing apoptotic gene expression. MIN6 cells were cultured for 4–24 h in the presence of normoxia (N, 20% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2). Changes in (ae) mRNA and (f) protein levels. n = 4 experiments. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia

Hypoxia reduces coatomer complex gene expression and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking

UPR coordination of the secretory pathway and ER-to-Golgi vesicular transport is fundamental in professional secretory cells [24, 25]. In parallel with the attenuation of the adaptive UPR, hypoxia (1% O2) reduced the mRNA levels of coatomer complex genes Copa, Cope, Copg [also known as Copg1], Copz1 and Copz2 in MIN6 cells and mouse islets (Fig. 5a, b). We also tested whether hypoxia alters ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking using a VSVG reporter assay [26]. The temperature-sensitive VSVG mutant protein is retained in the ER at 40°C (ESM Fig. 4) and translocates to the Golgi after the switch to the permissive temperature of 32°C [21]. Interestingly, in comparison to the normoxic condition, cells treated with hypoxia (1% O2) retained substantial VSVG in the ER (Fig. 5c, d), thereby demonstrating that hypoxia delays ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking. ER morphology did not differ in cells treated with normoxia and hypoxia (ESM Fig. 5). The positive control ER stress inducer, tunicamycin, strongly inhibited ER-to-Golgi trafficking of VSVG (Fig. 5c, d). These results demonstrate for the first time that hypoxia impairs ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking in beta cells in association with the downregulation of adaptive UPR and coatomer protein complex (Cop) genes. Similar results were obtained using 5% O2 (ESM Figs 6, 7), whereas with 10% O2, hypoxia-response gene and Ddit3 mRNA levels were only slightly increased and the majority of the adaptive UPR and Cop genes were unchanged, with the exception of slightly reduced Copz1 mRNA levels (ESM Figs 8, 9).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Hypoxia reduces Cop gene expression and delays ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking. (a, c, d) MIN6 cells and (b) mouse islets were cultured in the presence of normoxia (N, 20% O2, white bars) or hypoxia (H, 1% O2, black bars). (a, b) Changes in Cop gene mRNA levels. (c) Representative images of VSVG-GFP and Golgi marker GM130 at 32°C. Tm: tunicamycin treatment (5 μg/ml; 20% O2). Scale bar, 10 μm. (d) VSVG localisation score. n = 3–4 experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia

Hypoxia downregulates the adaptive UPR independently of HIF1α activation

Hypoxia triggers a transcriptional programme including gene repression via the stabilisation of HIF1/2α [27, 28]. We therefore examined the role of HIF1α in hypoxia-mediated downregulation of adaptive UPR. Knockdown of HIF1α using siRNA prevented the upregulation of HIF-target genes after hypoxia (ESM Fig. 10a–d), but did not affect hypoxia-mediated downregulation of adaptive UPR genes Hspa5, Hsp90b1, Fkbp11 and Pdia4 (ESM Fig. 10e–h). On the other hand, HIF1α knockdown potentiated the hypoxia-mediated increases in Ddit3, Atf3 and Trb3 mRNA levels and cell death (ESM Fig. 10i–l). These results show that Hif1α activation is not required for the decline of adaptive UPR gene expression during hypoxia.

JNK activity is partially responsible for downregulation of the adaptive UPR, reduced ER-to-Golgi trafficking and increased beta cell death following hypoxia

JNK has been implicated in beta cell apoptosis under various stress conditions [19, 2934], but has not previously been investigated in the context of islet hypoxia. Here we tested whether JNK activity influences beta cell responses to hypoxia. Strikingly, treatment of MIN6 cells with JNKi completely protected against the hypoxia-mediated reductions in Hspa5 and Hsp90b1 mRNA levels, and partially restored Fkbp11 and Dnajc3 mRNA levels (Fig. 6a–d). In agreement, inhibition of JNK activity prevented the hypoxia-mediated reduction of KDEL immunostaining (Fig. 6e). These changes were accompanied by the partial normalisation of XBP1s, PKR and EIF2A phosphorylation, DDIT3 and cleaved caspase 3 protein levels (Fig. 6f, ESM Fig. 11) as well as reduced cell death (Fig. 6g). Additionally, JNK inhibition either partially or completely protected against hypoxia-mediated reductions in Cop mRNA levels (Fig. 6h–k) and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking (Fig. 6l, m). These novel findings indicate that JNK activation is necessary for alterations in the UPR during hypoxic stress.

Fig. 6
figure 6

JNK inhibition protects against downregulation of adaptive UPR and Cop gene expression, defective ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking and apoptosis due to hypoxia. MIN6 cells were cultured under normoxia (20% O2, white bars) or hypoxia (1% O2, black bars) in the presence of DMSO (C, control) or JNKi (10 μmol/l). Changes in (ad) adaptive UPR gene expression, (e) KDEL immunostaining, (f) protein levels, (g) apoptosis, (hk) Cop gene expression, (l) VSVG-GFP subcellular localisation at 32°C and (m) VSVG localisation score. Scale bars, 10 μm. n = 3–5 experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia. p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs control

DDIT3 induction is required for hypoxia-mediated downregulation of the adaptive UPR

Since DDIT3 can act as a negative transcriptional regulator [35, 36] and its expression was lowered by JNK inhibition (Fig. 6f), we examined the influence of DDIT3 in the hypoxia-mediated changes in the adaptive UPR. Interestingly, siRNA-mediated knockdown of DDIT3 expression (Fig. 7a, ESM Fig. 12) upregulated the mRNA levels of adaptive UPR genes Hspa5, Hsp90b1 and Fkbp11 under normoxia and delayed their downregulation following hypoxia (Fig. 7b–d). This was associated with a partial reduction in hypoxia-induced cell death (Fig. 7e). We then tested whether the protective effect of DDIT3 knockdown on hypoxia-induced cell death was due to changes in the adaptive UPR using knockdown of both DDIT3 and HSPA5. We found that the protective effect of DDIT3 knockdown was abolished with the concomitant knockdown of HSPA5. These findings demonstrate that downregulation of the adaptive UPR is required for DDIT3-dependent cell death during hypoxia (Fig. 7e).

Fig. 7
figure 7

DDIT3 contributes to hypoxia-induced apoptosis by downregulating the adaptive UPR. MIN6 cells transfected with either control siRNA (si-C) or siRNA against Ddit3, Hspa5 or both (si-D/H) were cultured for 12–24 h in the presence of normoxia (20% O2; white bars) or hypoxia (1% O2; black bars). Changes in (ad) mRNA levels and (e) apoptosis. n = 3–7 experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia. †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs control siRNA. ‡‡ p < 0.01 vs Ddit3 siRNA

Overexpression of HSPA5 significantly protects against hypoxia-induced beta cell death

To further confirm the role of adaptive UPR downregulation in hypoxia-induced beta cell death, we examined the effects of restoring expression of the ER chaperone HSPA5 during hypoxia. Hspa5 overexpression (Fig. 8a, b) did not affect the expression of adaptive UPR components Hsp90b1 or Fkbp11 (Fig. 8c, d), but downregulated DDIT3 after hypoxia (Fig. 8a, e). Hypoxia-induced apoptosis was significantly reduced in HSPA5-overproducing vs control (EGFP-producing) MIN6 cells (Fig. 8f). These data are the first indication that the decline of the adaptive UPR is at least partially required for hypoxia-induced cell death in beta cells.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Overexpression of Hspa5 partially protects against hypoxia-induced apoptosis. MIN6 cells transfected with either EGFP or HSPA5 encoding vector were cultured for 24 h in the presence of normoxia (20% O2; white bars) or hypoxia (1% O2; black bars). Changes in (a) protein, (be) mRNA levels and (f) apoptosis. n = 3–4 experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs normoxia. p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs control siRNA. (g) The proposed model: Hypoxia inhibits adaptive UPR gene expression and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking in beta cells via the activation of JNK and DDIT3. Hypoxia-mediated reductions in ER folding capacity, ATP production and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking lead to the accumulation of unfolded proteins, irresolvable ER stress and ultimately beta cell death. Direction of arrows indicates the effect of hypoxia. DNAJB9, DnaJ (Hsp40) homologue, subfamily B, member 9; DNAJC3, DnaJ (Hsp40) homologue, subfamily C, member 3; FKBP11, FK506 binding protein 11; GCN2, general control nonderepressible 2 (also known as EIF2AK4); HRI, heme regulated initiation factor 2 alpha kinase (also known as EIF2AK1); PDIA4, protein disulfide isomerase family A, member 4

Discussion

We demonstrate here that hypoxia strongly downregulates the protective adaptive UPR in beta cells. We further show that downregulation of the adaptive UPR is associated with impaired ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking and increased beta cell death during hypoxic stress. These findings indicate for the first time that hypoxia may contribute to the decline of the adaptive UPR in type 2 diabetes islets [1416] and in islet graft failure [17]. Furthermore, our results provide JNK and DDIT3 activation as molecular mechanisms for downregulation of the adaptive UPR during hypoxic stress.

Aberrant UPR in beta cells during hypoxia

Hypoxia may contribute to beta cell dedifferentiation and loss in type 2 diabetes [7, 37] and after islet transplantation [9]. In the present study, we demonstrate a novel in vivo association between hypoxia and downregulation of the adaptive UPR in islets of diabetic mice. The upregulation of hypoxia-response genes solely in the islets of diabetic mice (Fig. 1) is paralleled by reduced expression of a group of adaptive UPR genes (Hspa5, Hsp90b1, Pdia4 and Dnajc3; averaged mRNA levels were reduced by 39.2 ± 9.0% in the islets of diabetic compared with prediabetic db/db mice, n = 8–12, p < 0.01 [14]). Our findings suggest that the deleterious effects of islet hypoxia include downregulation of the adaptive UPR in type 2 diabetes. In non-beta cells (ESM Fig. 2 and [3840]), hypoxia activates canonical UPR signalling, including increased PERK/EIF2A phosphorylation, Xbp1 mRNA splicing and upregulation of ER chaperones. The atypical response to hypoxia in beta cells is evidenced by the absence of even transient activation of the adaptive UPR. Perhaps this is the result of an already high basal activity of the adaptive UPR in specialised secretory beta cells in comparison to non-secretory cells. Interestingly, despite the reduction of PERK phosphorylation, PKR and EIF2A phosphorylation and DDIT3 expression were increased (Figs 2 and 4), suggesting that hypoxia activates the ISR [23, 41, 42] (Fig. 8g).

Hypoxia impairs ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking in beta cells

The ER is the primary compartment of the secretory pathway. After proper folding and post-translational modifications, cargo proteins undergo subsequent trafficking between the ER-Golgi compartments to receive additional modifications before vesicular transport to the plasma membrane and secretion. Our results clearly demonstrate that hypoxia slowed ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking. Whether defective trafficking is up or downstream of ER stress is not clear. The downregulation of chaperones, co-chaperones and foldases may exacerbate the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER leading to reduced ER-to-Golgi trafficking (Fig. 8g). Indeed, tunicamycin, which directly induces ER stress by inhibiting protein glycosylation, was sufficient to cause strong inhibition of ER-to-Golgi trafficking (Fig. 5). Alternatively, under hypoxic conditions, low cellular energetic status or reduced expression of ER-Golgi vesicle transport genes may initiate the trafficking defect, which in turn exacerbates ER stress because of the build-up of protein in the ER lumen (Fig. 8g). Interestingly, hypoxia reduced the mRNA levels of Cop genes (Fig. 5), several of which were also reduced in the islets of diabetic db/db mice (ESM Fig. 13). These genes are regulated by XBP1s [24, 25] and are correlated with Xbp1 mRNA splicing following glucose stimulation in beta cells [43]. A recent study showed that impaired Golgi-to-ER retrograde transport can induce beta cell ER stress [44]. Moreover, blockage of ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking causes accumulation of proteins in the ER and thus ER stress in beta cells chronically exposed to saturated fatty acids [21, 22, 45].

Downregulation of the adaptive UPR links JNK-DDIT3 activation with beta cell apoptosis during hypoxic stress

We have identified JNK as a crucial regulator of the UPR and beta cell survival during hypoxia. JNK activation reduces the adaptive UPR, Cop gene expression and ER-to-Golgi trafficking while promoting beta cell apoptosis following hypoxia (Fig. 6). We further show that JNK activation contributes to the downregulation of Cop gene expression in the islets of diabetic db/db mice (ESM Fig. 13). Although JNKi is regarded as a specific inhibitor of JNK activation, we cannot rule out the potential of an off target effect. JNK is a well-established stress-activated pro-apoptotic effector in beta cells [2934]. It also plays a role in the regulation of the UPR following pro-inflammatory cytokine stimulation [19, 46]. Hypoxia-induced JNK activation appears to occur independently of IRE1 (Fig. 2). Interestingly, hypoxia increased the expression of inflammatory genes (ESM Fig. 14), raising the possibility that hypoxia activates JNK via inflammatory signalling. Moreover, ISR components (PKR and EIF2A phosphorylation and DDIT3 expression) were reduced by JNK inhibition during hypoxia (Fig. 6). DDIT3 is an established modulator of beta cell apoptosis [47], including that induced by hypoxia (Fig. 7 and [8, 37]), an effect that we show was dependent on the decline of adaptive UPR (Fig. 7). HSPA5 overexpression only partially protects against the induction of Ddit3 and apoptosis during hypoxia (Fig. 8). However, other ER chaperones and protein folding enzymes are downregulated during hypoxia, which may reduce the impact of these factors when addressed individually.

Thus, our results identify a crucial role of DDIT3 downstream of JNK in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis and downregulation of the adaptive UPR. Other effectors must be involved, potentially generated via inflammatory (ESM Fig. 14) and/or metabolic pathways. The UPR during hypoxia resembles the beta cell response to low non-stimulatory glucose concentrations where ATP and ER [Ca2+] levels and protein synthesis are reduced [43, 4850]. However, the inhibitory effect of hypoxia on the adaptive UPR is observed even in the presence of low glucose concentrations (not shown) suggesting additional mechanisms. Our studies suggest that HIF1α, an important regulator of cell survival and gene expression during hypoxia [27, 28, 51], is not required for downregulation of the UPR. Finally, by demonstrating that overproduction of the ER chaperone HSPA5 partially protects against hypoxia-induced apoptosis, we provide the first indication that downregulation of the adaptive UPR contributes to hypoxic stress in beta cells, and by extension to beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first time that hypoxia inhibits the adaptive UPR and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking in beta cells. The decline of the adaptive UPR is associated with increased beta cell death during hypoxia. Hypoxia might therefore contribute to the failure of the adaptive UPR and the progressive loss of functional beta cell mass in type 2 diabetes. The identification of the hypoxia–JNK–DDIT3 axis in adaptive UPR failure may help for the development of therapeutic strategies to protect beta cells in type 2 diabetes and after islet transplantation.