Introduction

Nephropathy associated with type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of end-stage renal disease. The earliest clinical sign of diabetic nephropathy is an elevated urinary AER, referred to as microalbuminuria [1]. Microalbuminuria in diabetic patients has been recognised not only as a predictor of progression of diabetic nephropathy, but also as a powerful independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease [25]. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that only a limited proportion of diabetic patients develop microalbuminuria [1]; thus, early identification of at-risk patients and initiation of appropriate therapy is important for the improvement of outcomes.

Chronic subclinical inflammation has been proposed to be involved in the development of microalbuminuria in diabetes [6, 7]. This hypothesis is supported by several cross-sectional studies reporting elevated levels of markers of inflammation, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), TNF-α and IL-1, in diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy versus those without [810]. IL-18, previously termed IFN-γ-inducing factor, is a potent proinflammatory cytokine involved in both innate and acquired immune responses [11]. IL-18 initiates a cytokine cascade with concomitant expression of proinflammatory markers, and the overproduction of IL-18 has been reported in various human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [12]. Thus, IL-18 may contribute to the development of diabetic nephropathy mediated by inflammation.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the serum levels of IL-18 or hs-CRP could predict the development of early diabetic nephropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, in a long-term observational follow-up study. In the present study, we assessed two outcomes: stage of diabetic nephropathy, and kidney function as indicated by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Subjects and methods

Subjects and examination

A total of 249 Japanese type 2 diabetic patients without overt proteinuria were recruited from individuals who regularly visited the outpatient clinic of the Department of Medicine at Shiga University of Medical Science during 1996–1998, as reported previously [13]. Briefly, in the initial 2 years (baseline period) patients clinically diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes according to the WHO criteria [14] provided multiple 24-h urine samples for assessment of urinary AER and eGFR. On the basis of multiple urinary AER measurements (mean 2.7, range 2–9 measurements), patients were classified (regardless of diabetes duration) as having normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria or overt proteinuria. Only patients with normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria at baseline were enrolled. Each individual provided a blood sample for biochemical measurements. Serum was stored at −80°C if not analysed immediately. At each annual follow-up, participants underwent a standardised physical examination and provided a blood sample for biochemical measurements and a 24-h urine sample for determination of AER. Participants were followed up for at least 3 years, until the end of 2005 or death.

Serum levels of IL-18 were measured using a sandwich ELISA (MBL, Nagoya, Japan). In brief, diluted serum samples and standards were incubated on 96-well plates coated with anti-human IL-18 monoclonal antibody. After washing, a peroxidise-conjugated anti-human IL-18 monoclonal antibody was added to each microwell and incubated. After another washing, the peroxidase substrate was mixed with the chromogen and allowed to incubate for 30 min at room temperature. After terminating the enzyme reaction using an acid stop solution, the optical density of each well was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The intra- and inter-assay CVs for IL-18 were 5.6% and 6.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 12.5 ng/l. Serum levels of hs-CRP were measured using a latex turbidimetric immunoassay, which had a sensitivity of 0.05 mg/l (Nanopia CRP; Daiichi Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). The intra- and inter-assay CVs for hs-CRP were 1.0% and 0.8%, respectively. These parameters were measured twice for each individual at baseline, and the geometric mean was used as the baseline value in the analysis. Data for 249 patients (173 with normoalbuminuria, 76 with microalbuminuria at baseline) were used in the analysis.

The study protocol and informed consent procedure were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiga University of Medical Science.

Definition of outcomes

The stage of diabetic nephropathy was determined by the AER as measured by the immunoturbidimetry assay (Hitachi 7070E; Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) in 24-h urine samples. Patients were designated as having normoalbuminuria (AER <20 μg/min), microalbuminuria (20 ≤ AER [μg/min] < 200) or overt proteinuria (AER ≥ 200 μg/min and eGFR ≥60 ml min−1 1.73 m−2; stage 1 or 2 according to the clinical practice guidelines set out by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative of the National Kidney Foundation [K/DOQI] [15]) based on at least two consecutive measurements. The outcome in terms of diabetic nephropathy stage was defined as the transition from any given stage to a more advanced stage of diabetic nephropathy for two consecutive years. Subjects who showed an intermittent transition to advanced stages were not classed as progressors.

The GFR was estimated using one of the equations developed in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study [16]. In the present study, data on daily urea excretion from 24-h urine collection was available for each individual. We therefore used the following MDRD equation, which includes demographic, serum and urine variables, and was reported to be the most precise in the original MDRD study [16]:

$${\text{GFR}} = 198 \times {\left[ {{\text{Pcr}} \times 0.0113} \right]}^{{ - 0.858}} \times {\left[ {{\text{age}}} \right]}^{{ - 0.167}} \times {\left[ {0.822\;{\text{if}}\;{\text{patient}}\;{\text{is}}\;{\text{female}}} \right]} \times {\left[ {{\text{SUN}} \times 2.8011} \right]}^{{ - 0.293}} \times {\left[ {{\text{UUN}}} \right]}^{{ + 0.249}} $$

where Pcr is serum creatinine concentration expressed as μmol/l (original equation in [16] modified to incorporate SI units, with mg/dl converted into μmol/l), SUN is serum urea nitrogen concentration expressed as mmol/l (original equation in [16] modified to incorporate SI units, with mg/dl converted into mmol/l), and UUN is urinary urea nitrogen excretion (g/day). The rate of annual decline in eGFR (ΔeGFR) over the course of the study was determined from the slope of the plot of all measurements of eGFR for each individual (median eight measurements, range 4–14 measurements) calculated by linear regression analysis and was expressed as ml min−1 1.73 m−2 year−1.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between subjects within each study group were made by χ2 tests with Fisher’s exact test. Comparisons between groups were performed by using an unpaired Student’s t test for normally distributed variables and a Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. Correlation was determined by a multivariate linear regression analysis with a stepwise backward method. Time to incidence of transition of nephropathy stage was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and statistical differences between groups were compared by the log-rank test. Follow-up time was censored if microalbuminuria developed or progressed, or if the patient was unavailable for follow-up. To adjust for the influence of conventional risk factors on the transition, a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied. The independent variables used as conventional risk factors were sex, age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, AER, systolic BP, diastolic BP, hypertension (present/absent), the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (yes/no), retinopathy (present/absent), BMI, current smoker and eGFR at baseline. Given that a target blood pressure of <130/80 mmHg is now recommended in diabetic patients [1], in this study, hypertension was defined as a BP ≥130/80 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive drugs. All data were analysed using the SPSS software package (version 11; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p value of less than 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the participants according to stage of diabetic nephropathy at the baseline. At baseline, the proportion of men, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, triacylglycerol, systolic BP, diastolic BP, BMI, percentage of current smokers and AER were all significantly higher in the group of diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria than in the group with normoalbuminuria. Subjects with microalbuminuria had significantly lower levels of HDL-cholesterol compared with subjects with normoalbuminuria. Interestingly, serum levels of IL-18 were significantly elevated in subjects with microalbuminuria compared with those with normoalbuminuria, whereas serum hs-CRP levels were not different in the two groups. Significant independent correlations with serum levels of IL-18 were observed for sex (female: β = −0.18, p = 0.001), log AER (β = 0.22, p < 0.001), log HDL-cholesterol (β = −0.20, p < 0.001) and log hs-CRP (β = 0.15, p = 0.006) in a multivariate linear regression analysis with stepwise method.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics at baseline in subgroups according to the clinical stages of diabetic nephropathy

We next explored the predictive effect of IL-18 and hs-CRP on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. During the follow-up period (median 7 years, range 3–8 years), 25 of the 173 diabetic subjects with normoalbuminuria and 21 of the 76 with microalbuminuria showed a transition from any given stage to a more advanced stage of diabetic nephropathy. Among subjects with normoalbuminuria at baseline, serum IL-18 levels were elevated in those whose nephropathy progressed to a more advanced stage compared with those who remained normoalbuminuric (118 [interquartile range 91–159] ng/l vs 155 [interquartile range 121–205] ng/l, p = 0.003 by Mann–Whitney U test), whereas, among subjects with microalbuminuria at baseline, IL-18 levels were not different between these two subgroups (154 [interquartile range 113–200] ng/l vs 160 [interquartile range 101–190] ng/l, p = 0.50). This trend remained even when the analysis was adjusted for sex. Serum levels of hs-CRP did not differ between the non-progressors and progressors in either the normoalbuminuria group (0.6 [interquartile range 0.3–1.2] mg/l vs 0.8 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] mg/l) or the microalbuminuria group (0.7 [interquartile range: 0.4–1.4] mg/l vs 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.2] mg/l). Furthermore, serum levels of IL-18 (≥134.6 ng/l) above the median were predictive of the progression of nephropathy to a higher stage in patients with normoalbuminuria, as examined with the Kaplan–Meier method (log-rank test p = 0.005), but not in those with microalbuminuria (Fig. 1). The adjusted risk for subjects with normoalbuminuria and serum IL-18 levels above the median level was 3.6 (95% CI 1.2–10.4) after adjustment for conventional risk factors in the multiple hazard Cox model. In addition, neither serum levels of IL-18 nor hs-CRP were associated with mortality, although only six patients died during the follow-up period.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves for the development and progression of microalbuminuria according to serum levels of IL-18. a Subjects with normoalbuminuria at baseline (p = 0.005 by log-rank test). b Subjects with microalbuminuria at baseline (p = 0.83 by log-rank test). Subjects with IL-18 ≥134.6 ng/l ; subjects with IL-18 <134.6 ng/l

To further evaluate the predictive value of serum IL-18 in subjects with normoalbuminuria, these subjects were categorised as being above (high normal: 7.5 μg/min ≤ AER < 20 μg/min) or below (low normal: AER <7.5 μg/min) the median value for urinary AER. Normoalbuminuric subjects with serum IL-18 levels above the median and a high normal AER had an increased risk of developing microalbuminuria (Fig. 2). Their adjusted risk compared with those with serum IL-18 levels below the median and a low normal AER was 12.9 (95% CI 2.9–58.4) in the multiple hazard Cox model after adjustment for conventional risk factors, whereas the risk was 1.7 (95% CI 0.2–12.3) in subjects with above-median serum IL-18 levels and a low normal AER, and 2.7 (95% CI 0.5–15.2) in those with below-median serum IL-18 levels and a high normal AER.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for the development of microalbuminuria in subjects with normoalbuminuria. The subjects were categorised as being above or below the median for serum IL-18 levels (134.6 ng/l) and urinary AER (7.5 μg/min). , low IL-18 + low AER (n = 54); , high IL-18 + low AER (n = 33); , low IL-18 + high AER (n = 41); , high IL-8 + high AER (n = 45). p value for trend was <0.001

Finally, we investigated the effect of serum IL-18 on kidney function as evaluated by the annual rate of change in eGFR in the entire study population. In subjects with above-median serum IL-18, the rate of annual change in eGFR was significantly higher than in those with below-median serum IL-18 (−2.1 [interquartile range −0.5 to −3.0] ml min−1 1.73 m−2 year−1 vs −1.1 [interquartile range −0.2 to −2.9] ml min−1 1.73 m−2 year−1, p = 0.036) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The annual rate of decline in eGFR for patients grouped according to serum levels of IL-18. Horizontal bars represent medians, columns indicate interquartile ranges, and vertical bars represent 95% CIs. *p = 0.036 by Mann–Whitney U test

Discussion

The present study provides evidence of the prognostic impact of elevated serum IL-18 on future development of microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The effect of serum IL-18 was significantly enhanced in patients with high normal levels of urinary AER. Furthermore, elevated serum levels of IL-18 were associated with an accelerated annual rate of decline in eGFR. Thus, the measurement of serum IL-18 may be very useful for the identification of subjects at high risk of future renal dysfunction, which is an independent risk factor for renal and cardiovascular diseases.

The present findings for IL-18 examined in a long-term follow-up study extend the findings of previous cross-sectional association studies in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus [1719]. Nakamura et al. reported that serum and urinary IL-18 levels in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus correlated positively with urinary AER at baseline and after 6 months, a relatively short period [19]. Our longer observational follow-up study clearly showed a prognostic impact of serum IL-18 levels on the future development of microalbuminuria. Thus, these results strongly suggest that the upregulation of IL-18 contributes to the development of diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetic patients.

Epidemiological studies have shown that only a limited number of patients with type 2 diabetes develop diabetic nephropathy [1]. High levels of urinary AER, even within the range of normoalbuminuria, are reported to be predictive of progression to microalbuminuria or proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [20, 21]. The present study clearly showed that high serum IL-18 levels are a strong predictor of the development of microalbuminuria in patients with normal but relatively high levels of urinary AER. This combination of serum IL-18 and urinary AER might come to be clinically considered as a useful way of identifying patients at risk of developing microalbuminuria.

The prognostic impact of serum IL-18 was not observed in patients with microalbuminuria. A plausible explanation is that microalbuminuria per se may be a consequence and/or the cause of a chronic state of subclinical inflammation. There is growing evidence that in diabetic patients, as well as in non-diabetic individuals, microalbuminuria is associated with endothelial dysfunction and subclinical inflammation [22]. Microalbuminuria may reflect diffuse endothelial damage secondary to a chronic state of subclinical inflammation. Elevated serum IL-18 may be a reflection of this state, which subsequently leads to the development of microalbuminuria. In fact, the levels of serum IL-18 in normoalbuminuric patients who later developed microalbuminuria were similar to those in patients with microalbuminuria at baseline. Nevertheless, the diabetic patients with lower levels of serum IL-18 may have some genetic protection against inflammation. The inhibitory molecules involved in the IL-18 inflammatory cascade may serve as a protective mechanism in such patients. A further study is required to elucidate this point.

Microalbuminuria has been shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in both diabetic and non-diabetic study populations [25]. The relative contributions of diabetic nephropathy to microalbuminuria and underlying vascular disease are not clear. Inflammation and activated innate immunity are considered to play an important role, not only in the development of microalbuminuria, but also in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Although the regulation of IL-18 is still poorly understood, IL-18 is now recognised as a central regulator of innate and acquired immune responses and as a pleiotropic proinflammatory cytokine, playing an early role in the inflammatory cascade [12]. Thus, IL-18 may play a pivotal role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the relationship between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular disease.

In the present study, serum hs-CRP levels were not associated with the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Previous cross-sectional studies have observed high serum levels of hs-CRP in patients with diabetic nephropathy, suggesting a link between subclinical (low-grade) inflammation and diabetic nephropathy [8]. However, in our study serum levels of hs-CRP were not associated with the stage of diabetic nephropathy or the development of microalbuminuria. Although the reason for these discrepancies remains unclear, we suspect that IL-18 may more sensitively reflect chronic subclinical inflammation than hs-CRP, or may specifically reflect local inflammation in the kidney rather than systemic subclinical inflammation.

Several study limitations are acknowledged. In the present study, we did not evaluate the time-dependent changes of serum IL-18 levels during the follow-up period. Serum levels of IL-18 may be modified by certain medications, such as the renin–angiotensin blockers, which are reported to inhibit the production of IL-18 [23]. At baseline (1996–1998), approximately 20–30% of participants in the present study had taken an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker, whereas over 70% of diabetic patients at our hospital are now prescribed these medications (S. Araki, unpublished data). Thus, a further study is required to answer the interesting question of whether the decrease in serum IL-18 levels induced by medication can modify the outcome. Also, the pathophysiological mechanisms by which the high serum levels of IL-18 predict the development of microalbuminuria remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, the source of the increased serum IL-18 in diabetic patients is not known. The upregulation of IL-18 in the diabetic kidney or infiltrated macrophage in the kidney may be responsible for the increased levels. However, this phenomenon may merely reflect the systemic chronic inflammation and not be specific to the kidney. Further human and animal studies are needed to elucidate these points.

In conclusion, our long-term observational follow-up study shows that a combination of high serum levels of IL-18 and high but normal AER has a strong prognostic impact on the future development of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria. This effect is independent of known conventional risk factors. Elevated levels of serum IL-18 were also associated with an accelerated decline in renal function. Therefore, measuring serum IL-18 in addition to urinary AER may allow the early identification of diabetic patients at risk of renal so that the appropriate medication may be initiated for the preservation of these complications.