Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic correlations (ρ g ) are frequently estimated from natural and experimental populations, yet many of the statistical properties of estimators of ρ g are not known, and accurate methods have not been described for estimating the precision of estimates of ρ g . Our objective was to assess the statistical properties of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), restricted maximum likelihood (REML), and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of ρ g by simulating bivariate normal samples for the one-way balanced linear model. We estimated probabilities of non-positive definite MANOVA estimates of genetic variance-covariance matrices and biases and variances of MANOVA, REML, and ML estimators of ρ g , and assessed the accuracy of parametric, jackknife, and bootstrap variance and confidence interval estimators for ρ g . MANOVA estimates of ρ g were normally distributed. REML and ML estimates were normally distributed for ρ g = 0.1, but skewed for ρ g = 0.5 and 0.9. All of the estimators were biased. The MANOVA estimator was less biased than REML and ML estimators when heritability (H), the number of genotypes (n), and the number of replications (r) were low. The biases were otherwise nearly equal for different estimators and could not be reduced by jackknifing or bootstrapping. The variance of the MANOVA estimator was greater than the variance of the REML or ML estimator for most H, n, and r. Bootstrapping produced estimates of the variance of ρ g close to the known variance, especially for REML and ML. The observed coverages of the REML and ML bootstrap interval estimators were consistently close to stated coverages, whereas the observed coverage of the MANOVA bootstrap interval estimator was unsatisfactory for some H, ρ g , n, and r. The other interval estimators produced unsatisfactory coverages. REML and ML bootstrap interval estimates were narrower than MANOVA bootstrap interval estimates for most H, ρ g , n, and r.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya Y (1985) What should be done when a estimated betweengroup covariance matrix is not nonnegative definite? The Am Stat 39:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RL, Crump PP (1967) Comparisons of designs and estimation procedures for estimating parameters in a two-stage nested process. Technometrics 9:499–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvesen JN, Schmitz TH (1970) Robust procedures for variance component problems using the jackknife. Biometrics 26:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges WC, Knapp SJ (1987) Probabilities of negative estimates of genetic variances. Theor Appl Genet 74:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges WC, Knapp SJ, Cornelius PJ (1990) Standard errors and confidence interval estimators for expected selection response. Crop Sci 31:253–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, Dykstra RL (1991) Least squares estimation of covariance matrices in balanced multivariate variance components models. J Am Stat Assoc 86:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron ND, Thompson R (1986) Design of multivariate selection experiments to estimate genetic parameters. Theor Appl Genet 72:466–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The Jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1987) The better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 82:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunsett FC, Andriano KN, Rutledge JJ (1982) Estimating the precision of estimates of genetic parameters realized from multipletrait selection experiments. Biometrics 38:981–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA (1977) Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc 72:320–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG, Thompson R (1978) Probabilities of non-positive definte between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ME (1987) Multivariate statistical simulation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman AL (1975) Computer generation of random variables with normal and Student’s t distributions. In: Proc Stat Comp Sec Amer Stat Assoc, pp

  • Klotz J, Putter J (1969) Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate covariance components for the balanced one-way layout. Ann Math Stat 40:1100–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp SJ, Bridges WC (1988) Parametric and jackknife confidence interval estimators for two-factor mating design genetic variance ratios. Theor Appl Genet 76:385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp SJ, Bridges WC, Yang MH (1989) Nonparametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response. Genetics 121:891–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp SJ, Tagliani LA, Liu B-H (1991) Outcrossing rates of experimental populations of Cuphea lanceolata. Plant Breed 106:334–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1984) The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genet Res 44:309–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B-H (1990) Statistical properties of estimators of genetic correlation. PhD dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis (Diss Abstr #9032678)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchan BG, Ou JX, Namkoong G (1985) A comparison of planned unbalanced designs for estimating heritability in perennial tree crops. Theor Appl Genet 71:536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer K (1991) Estimating variances and covariances for multivariate animal models by restricted maximum likelihood. Genet Sel Evol 23:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RG (1974) The jackknife—a review. Biometrika 61:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Olds T, Bergelson J (1990) Statistical genetics of Impatiens capensis. I. Genetic basis of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:407–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR, Kleffe J (1988) Estimation of variance components and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve ECR (1955) The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 11:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riska B, Prout T, Turelli M (1989) Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865–871

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (1959) The sampling variance of the genetic correlation. Biometrics 15:469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker N (1985) Qualms about bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 80:360–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinberg E (1966) The samplimg variance of the correlation coefficients estimated in genetic experiments. Biometrics 22:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Clegg MT (1986) Monte Carlo studies of plant mating system estimation models:the one-pollen parent and mixedmating models. Genetics 112:927–945

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR (1970) Linear models. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RH (1985) Maximum likelihood mean and covariance matrix estimation constrained to general positive semi-definiteness. Commun Statist-Theor Methods 14:2163–2179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow WH, Monahan JF (1984) Monte Carlo comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML estimators of variance components. Technometrics 26:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis GM (1959) Sampling errors of genetic correlation coefficients calculated from the analysis of variance and covariance. Aust J Stat 1:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R (1973) The estimation of variance and covariance components with an application when records are subject to culling. Biometrics 29:527–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WO (1975) A comparison of designs and estimators for the two-stage nested random model. Technometrics 17:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanVleck LD, Henderson CR (1961) Empirical sampling estimates of genetic correlations. Biometrics 17:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS (1990) Genetic data analysis. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. L. Kahler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, B.H., Knapp, S.J. & Birkes, D. Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 94, 8–19 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050375

Key words

Navigation