Abstract
Key message
Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis relies on the cumulative effects of dominance, overdominance, and epistasis in maize hybrid Yuyu22.
Abstract
Heterosis, i.e., when F1 hybrid phenotypes are superior to those of the parents, continues to play a critical role in boosting global grain yield. Notwithstanding our limited insight into the genetic and molecular basis of heterosis, it has been exploited extensively using different breeding approaches. In this study, we investigated the genetic underpinnings of grain yield and its components using “immortalized F2” and recombinant inbred line populations derived from the elite hybrid Yuyu22. A high-density linkage map consisting of 3,184 bins was used to assess (1) the additive and additive-by-additive effects determined using recombinant inbred lines; (2) the dominance and dominance-by-dominance effects from a mid-parent heterosis dataset; and (3) the various genetic effects in the “immortalized F2” population. Compared with a low-density simple sequence repeat map, the bin map identified more quantitative trait loci, with higher LOD scores and better accuracy of detecting quantitative trait loci. The bin map showed that, among all traits, dominance was more important to heterosis than other genetic effects. The importance of overdominance/pseudo-overdominance was proportional to the amount of heterosis. In addition, epistasis contributed to heterosis as well. Phenotypic variances explained by the QTLs detected were close to the broad-sense heritabilities of the observed traits. Comparison of the analyzed results obtained for the “immortalized F2” population with those for the mid-parent heterosis dataset indicated identical genetic modes of action for mid-parent heterosis and grain yield performance of the hybrid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen W, Zhang Y, Liu X, Chen B, Tu J, Fu T (2007) Detection of QTL for six yield-related traits in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using DH and immortalized F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet 115:849–858
Cockerham CC, Zeng ZB (1996) Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143:1437–1456
Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations. Biometrics 4:254–266
Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952) Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. ISU Press, Ames, pp 494–516
Coors JG, Pandey S (1999) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison
Crow JF (1948) Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33:477
Crow JF, Coors JG, Pandey S (1952) Heterosis. In: Gowen JW (ed) Dominance and overdominance. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 282–297
Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28:454–455
Duvick DN (1999) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 19–29
East E (1908) Inbreeding in corn in Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for Years 1907–1908. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, pp 419–428
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex
Ganal M, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Berard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner E, Hansen M, Joets J et al (2011) A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6:e28334
Gardner CO, Lonquist JH (1959) Linkage and the degree of dominance of genes controlling quantitative characters in maize. Agron J 51:524–528
Goff SA, Zhang Q (2013) Heterosis in elite hybrid rice: speculation on the genetic and biochemical mechanisms. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:221–227
Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37:1601–1610
Guo M, Rupe MA, Dieter JA, Zou JJ, Spielbauer D, Duncan KE, Howard RJ, Hou ZL, Simmons CR (2010) Cell Number Regulator 1 affects plant and organ size in maize: implications for crop yield enhancement and heterosis. Plant Cell 22:1057–1073
Guo T, Li H, Yan J, Tang J, Li J, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Wang J (2012) Performance prediction of F1 hybrids between recombinant inbred lines derived from two elite maize inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 126:189–201
Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement, 3rd edn. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 469–564
Hase T, Kimata Y, Matsumura T, Sakakibara H (1991) Molecular cloning and differential expression of the maize ferredoxin family. Plant Physiol 96:77–83
Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, Chollet D, Descombes P, Piepho HP, Hochholdinger F (2008) Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organspecific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics 179:1275–1283
Hua J, Xing Y, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q (2002) Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162:1885–1895
Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X et al (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2574–2579
Hull FH (1945) Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. J Am Soc Agron 37:134–145
Jones DF (1917) Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2:466–479
Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42:459–463
Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative trait loci using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199
Larièpe A, Mangin B, Jasson S, Combes V, Dumas F et al (2012) The genetic basis of heterosis: multiparental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 190:795–811
Li Z, Pinson SRM, Paterson AH, Park WD, Stansel JW (1997a) Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145:453–465
Li Z, Pinson SRM, Paterson AH, Park WD, Stansel JW (1997b) Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an inter-subspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics 145:1139–1148
Li H, Ye G, Wang J (2007) A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics 175:361–374
Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2007) Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet 23:60–66
Liu R, Wang B, Guo W, Wang L, Zhang T (2011) Differential gene expression and associated QTL mapping for cotton yield based on a cDNA-AFLP transcriptome map in an immortalized F2. Theor Appl Genet 123:439–454
Marrs KA (1996) The functions and regulation of glutathione S-transferases in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:127–158
McClure BA, Hagen G, Brown CS, Gee MA, Guilfoyle TJ (1989) Transcription, organization, and sequence of an auxin regulated gene cluster in soybean. Plant Cell 1:229–239
Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Piepho HP, Zeng Z, Schön CC (2007) The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177:1815–1825
Minvielle F (1987) Dominance is not necessary for heterosis: a two-locus model. Genet Res 49:245–247
Moll RH, Lindsey MF, Robinson HF (1964) Estimates of genetic variances and level of dominance in maize. Genetics 49:411–423
Pan Q, Ali F, Yang X, Li J, Yan J (2012) Exploring the genetic characteristics of two recombinant inbred line populations via high-density SNP markers in maize. PLoS ONE 7(12):e52777
Paschold A, Jia Y, Marcon C, Lund S, Larson NB et al (2012) Complementation contributes to transcriptome complexity in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids relative to their inbred parents. Genome Res 22:2445–2454
Rahman A, Wong KS, Jane JL, Myers AM, James MG (1998) Characterization of SU1 isoamylase, a determinant of storage starch structure in maize. Plant Physiol 117:425–435
Richey FD (1942) Mock-dominance and hybrid vigor. Science 96:280
Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 64:71–88
Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Am Breed Assoc Rep 4:296–301
Stuber CW (1994) Heterosis in plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 12:227–251
Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839
Stupar RM, Gardiner JM, Oldre AG, Haun WJ, Chandler VL, Springer NM (2008) Gene expression analysis in maize hybrids and hybrids with varying levels of heterosis. BMC Plant Biol 8:33
Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, Decook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D et al (2006) All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6805–6810
Takatsuji H (1998) Zinc–finger transcription factors in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 54:582–596
Tang J, Yan J, Ma X, Teng W, Wu W et al (2010) Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theor Appl Genet 120:333–340
Wang J, van Ginkel M, Podlich D, Ye G, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W, De Lacy IH, Cooper M, Rajaram S (2003) Comparison of two breeding strategies by computer simulation. Crop Sci 43:1764–1773
Wang J, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Ye G, Delacy I, Podlich D, Cooper M (2004) Simulating the effects of dominance and epistasis on selection response in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program using QuCim. Crop Sci 44:2006–2018
Wei G, Tao Y, Liu GZ, Chen C, Luo RY, Xia HA, Gan Q, Zeng HP, Lu ZK, Han YN et al (2009) A transcriptomic analysis of super hybrid rice LYP9 and its parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7695–7701
Williams W (1959) Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters. Nature 184:527–530
Xie W, Feng Q, Yu H, Huang X, Zhao Q et al (2010) Parent-independent genotyping for constructing an ultra high-density linkage map based on population sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10578–10583
Xing Y, Zhang Q (2010) Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:421–442
Yan J, Tang H, Huang Y, Zheng Y, Li J (2006) QTL mapping and epistatic analysis for yield and yield components using molecular markers with an elite maize hybrid. Euphytica 149:121–131
Yan J, Yang X, Shah T, Sanchez-Villeda H, Li J, Warburton M, Zhou Y, Crouch JH, Xu Y (2010) High-throughput SNP genotyping with the GoldenGate assay in maize. Mol Breed 25:441–451
Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ et al (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9226–9231
Zhang L, Li H, Li Z, Wang J (2008) Interactions between markers can be caused by the dominance effect of QTL. Genetics 180:1177–1190
Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, Zhang C, Xie W, Hua J, Xing Y, Xiao J, Zhang Q (2012) Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid Proc. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15847–15852
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully thank the editor Dr. Thomas Lubberstedt and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. This research was supported by the National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2012AA10A307) and the National Basic Research Program of China.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Thomas Lubberstedt.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, T., Yang, N., Tong, H. et al. Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis in an “immortalized F2” maize population. Theor Appl Genet 127, 2149–2158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2368-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2368-x