Abstract
In plant breeding, the ability to manipulate genetic (meiotic) recombination would be beneficial for facilitating gene transfer from wild relatives of crop plants. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system helps maintain genetic integrity by correcting base mismatches that arise via DNA synthesis or damage, and antagonizes recombination between homeologous (divergent) DNA sequences. Previous studies have established that the genomes of cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and the wild relative S. lycopersicoides are substantially diverged (homeologous) such that recombination between their chromosomes is strongly reduced. Here, we report the effects on homeologous recombination of suppressing endogenous MMR genes in S. lycopersicum via RNAi-induced silencing of SlMSH2 and SlMSH7 or overexpressing dominant negatives of Arabidopsis MSH2 (AtMSH2-DN) in an alien substitution line (SL-8) of S. lycopersicoides in tomato. We show that certain inhibitions of MMR (RNAi of SlMSH7, AtMSH2-DN) are associated with modest increases in homeologous recombination, ranging from 3.8 to 29.2% (average rate of 17.8%) compared to controls. Unexpectedly, only the AtMSH2-DN proteins but not RNAi-induced silencing of MSH2 was found to increase homeologous recombination. The ratio of single to double crossovers (SCO:DCO ratio) decreased by approximately 50% in progeny of the AtMSH2-DN parents. An increase in the frequency of heterozygous SL-8 plants was also observed in the progeny of the SlMSH7-RNAi parents. Our findings may contribute to acceleration of introgression in cultivated tomato.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adé J, Belzile F, Philippe H, Doutriaux MP (1999) Four mismatch repair paralogues coexist in Arabidopsis thaliana: AtMSH2, AtMSH3, AtMSH6–1 and AtMSH6–2. Mol Genet Genom 262:239–249
Alani E, Sokolsky T, Studamire B, Miret JJ, Lahue RS (1997) Genetic and biochemical analysis of Msh2p-Msh6p: Role of ATP hydrolysis and Msh2p-Msh6p subunit interactions in mismatch base recognition. Mol Cell Biol 17:2436–2447
Al-Kaff N, Knight E, Bertin I, Foote T, Hart N, Griffiths S, Moore G (2008) Detailed dissection of the chromosomal region containing the Ph1 locus in wheat Triticum aestivum: with deletion mutants and expression profiling. Ann Bot 101:863–872
Bailis AM, Rothstein R (1990) A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics 126:535–547
Baudat F, de Massy B (2007) Regulating double stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res 15:565–577
Belmaaza A, Milot E, Villemure JF, Chartrand P (1994) Interference of DNA sequence divergence with precise recombinational DNA repair in mammalian cells. EMBO J 13:5355–5360
Bozza CG, Pawlowski WP (2008) The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:313–319
Butlin RK (2005) Recombination and speciation. Mol Ecol 14:2621–2635
Canady MA, Meglic V, Chetelat RT (2005) A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in cultivated tomato. Genome 48:685–697
Chambers SR, Hunter N, Louis EJ, Borts RH (1996) The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol 16:6110–6120
Chen W, Jinks-Robertson S (1999) The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics 151:1299–1313
Chetelat RT, Meglic V (2000) Molecular mapping of chromosome segments introgressed from Solanum lycopersicoides into cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor Appl Genet 100:232–241
Chetelat RT, Cisneros P, Stamova L, Rick CM (1997) A male fertile Lycopersicon esculentum × Solanum lycopersicoides hybrid enables direct backcrossing to tomato at the diploid level. Euphytica 95:99–108
Chetelat RT, Meglic V, Cisneros P (2000) A genetic map of tomato based on BC(1) Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides reveals overall synteny but suppressed recombination between these homeologous genomes. Genetics 154:857–867
Culligan KM, Hays JB (1997) DNA mismatch repair in plants. An Arabidopsis thaliana gene that predicts a protein belonging to the MSH2 subfamily of eukaryotic muts homologs. Plant Physiol 115:833–839
Culligan KM, Hays JB (2000) Arabidopsis MutS homologs-AtMSH2, AtMSH3, AtMSH6, and a novel AtMSH7-form three distinct protein heterodimers with different specificities for mismatched DNA. Plant Cell 12:991–1002
Datta A, Adjiri A, New L, Crouse GF, Jinks-Robertson S (1996) Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 16:1085–1093
Datta A, Hendrix M, Lipsitch M, Jinks-Robertson S (1997) Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9757–9762
de Boer E, Stam P, Dietrich AJ, Pastink A, Heyting C (2006) Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9607–9612
Dion E, Li L, Jean M, Belzile F (2007) An Arabidopsis MLH1 mutant exhibits reproductive defects and reveals a dual role for this gene in mitotic recombination. Plant J 51:431–440
Dong C, Whitford R, Langridge P (2002) A DNA mismatch repair gene links to the Ph2 locus in wheat. Genome 45:116–124
Dubcovsky J, Luo M-C, Dvorak J (1995) Differentiation between homoeologous chromosomes 1A of wheat and 1Am of Triticum monococcum and recognition of homology by the Ph1 locus of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:6645–6649
Edlinger B, Schlohelhofer P (2011) Have a break: detreminants of meiotic DNA double strand break (DSB) formation and processing in plants. J Exp Bot 62:1545–1563
Emmanuel E, Yehuda E, Melamed-Bessudo C, Avivi-Ragolsky N, Levy AA (2006) The role of AtMSH2 in homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO Rep 7:100–105
Fulton T, van der Hoeven R, Eannetta N, Tanksley S (2002) Identification, analysis and utilization of a conserved ortholog set (COS) markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:1457–1467
Gadish I, Zamir D (1986) Differential zygotic abortion in an interspecific Lycopersicum cross. Genome 29:156–159
Gaut BS, Wright SI, Rizzon C, Dvorak J, Anderson LK (2007) Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nat Rev Genet 8:77–84
Gleave AP (1992) A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organizational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol Biol 20:1203–1207
Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G (2006) Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439:749–752
Harfe BD, Jinks-Robertson S (2000) DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. Annu Rev Genet 34:359–399
Hartung F, Suer S, Puchta H (2007) Two closely related RecQ helicases have antagonistic roles in homologous recombination and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 140:18836–18841
Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Christopher F, Franklin H, Jones GH (2004) The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18:2557–2570
Hoffmann ER, Borts RH (2004) Meiotic recombination intermediates and mismatch repair proteins. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:232–248
Hunter N, Chambers SR, Louis EJ, Borts RH (1996) The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J 15:1726–1733
Jackson N, Sanchez-Moran E, Buckling E, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FC (2006) Reduced meiotic crossovers and delayed prophase I progression in AtMLH3-deficient Arabidopsis. EMBO J 25:1315–1323
Ji Y, Chetelat RT (2003) Homoeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 106:979–989
Ji Y, Pertuzé R, Chetelat RT (2004) Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades. Chromosome Res 12:107–116
Jiricny J (2006) The multifaceted mismatch-repair system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:335–346
Kimura S, Sakaguchi K (2006) DNA repair in plants. Chem Rev 106:753–766
Kolas NK, Cohen PE (2004) Novel and diverse function of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:216–231
Lafleuriel J, Degroote F, Depeiges A, Picard G (2007) Impact of the loss of AtMSH2 on double-strand break-induced recombination between highly diverged homeologous sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana germinal tissues. Plant Mol Biol 63:833–846
Lee L-Y, Kononov ME, Bassuner B, Frame BR, Wang K, Gelvin SB (2007) Novel plant transformation vectors containing the superpromoter. Plant Physio 145:1294–1300
Li GM (2008) Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair. Cell Res 18:85–98
Li L, Jean M, Belzile F (2006) The impact of sequence divergence and DNA mismatch repair on homeologous recombination in Arabidopsis. Plant J 45:908–916
Li J, Hisa A-P, Schnable PS (2007) Recent advances in plant recombination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:131–135
Li L, Dion E, Richard G, Domingue O, Jean M, Belzile FJ (2009) The Arabidopsis DNA mismatch repair gene PMS1 restricts somatic recombination between homeologous sequences. Plant Mol Biol 69:675–684
Lin DP, Wang Y, Scherer SJ, Clark AB, Yang K, Avdievich E, Jin B, Werling U, Parris T, Kurihara N, Umar A, Kucherlapati R, Lipkin M (2004) An Msh2 point mutation uncouples DNA mismatch repair and apoptosis. Cancer Res 64:517–522
Lloyd AH, Milligan AS, Langridge P, Able JA (2007) TaMSH7: a cereal mismatch repair gene that affects fertility in transgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Plant Biol 20:7–67
Lukaszewski AJ (1995) Physical distribution of translocation breakpoints in homoeologous recombinants induced by the absence of the Ph1 gene in wheat and triticale. Theor Appl Genet 90:714–719
Lukaszewski AJ (2000) Manipulation of the 1RS.1BL translocation in wheat by induced homoeologous recombination. Crop Sci 40:216–225
Lukaszewski AJ, Rybka K, Korzun V, Malyshev SV, Lapinski B, Whitkus R (2004) Genetic and physical mapping of homoeologous recombination points involving wheat chromosome 2B and rye chromosome 2R. Genome 47:36–45
Luo M-C, Dubcovsky J, Goyal S, Dvorak J (1996) Engineering of interstitial foreign chromosome segments containing the K+/NA+ selectivity gene Kna1 by sequential homoeologous recombination in durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 93:1180–1184
Luo M-C, Yang ZL, Kota RS, Dvorak J (2000) Recombination of chromosomes 3Am and 5Am of Triticum monococcum with homoeologous chromosomes 3A and 5A of wheat: the distribution of recombination across chromosomes. Genetics 154:1301–1308
Lynn A, Soucek R, Borner GV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res 15:591–605
Martinez-Perez E, Moore G (2008) To check or not to check? The application of meiotic studies to plant breeding. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:222–227
Matic I, Radman M, Rayssiguier C (1994) Structure of recombinants from conjugational crosses between Escherichia coli donor and mismatch repair deficient Salmonella typhimurium recipients. Genetics 136:17–26
Menzel MY (1962) Pachytene chromosomes of the intergeneric hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum × Solanum lycopersicoides. Am J Bot 49:605–615
Mercier R, Grelon M (2008) Meiosis in plants: ten years of gene discovery. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:281–290
Nicholson A, Hendrix M, Jinks-Robertson S, Crouse GF (2000) Regulation of mitotic homeologous recombination in yeast. Functions of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair genes. Genetics 154:133–146
Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH (2011) Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 190:523–544
Parokonny AS, Marshall JA, Bennett MD, Cocking EC, Davey MR, Power JB (1997) Homeologous pairing and recombination in backcross derivatives of tomato somatic hybrids [Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum]. Theor Appl Genet 94:713–723
Pertuze RA, Ji Y, Chetelat RT (2002) Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome 45:1003–1012
Priebe SD, Westmoreland J, Nilsson-Tillgren T, Resnick MA (1994) Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol 14:4802–4814
Qi L, Friebe B, Zhang P, Gill BS (2007) Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res 15:3–19
Rick CM (1951) Hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. And Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 37:741–744
Rick CM (1969) Controlled introgression of chromosomes of Solanum pennellii into Lycopersicon esculentum: segregation and recombination. Gene 62:753–768
Rick CM (1988) Tomato like nightshades: affinities, autecology and breeders opportunities. Econ Bot 42:145–154
Rick CM, deVerna JW, Chetelat RT, Stevens MA (1986) Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3580–3583
Roberts MA, Reader SM, Dalgliesh C, Miller TE, Foote TN, Fish LJ, Snape JW, Moore G (1999) Induction and characterization of Ph1 wheat mutants. Genetics 153:1909–1918
Schuermann D, Molinier J, Fritsch J, Hohn B (2005) The dual nature of homologous recombination in plants. Trends Genet 21:172–181
Sears ER (1977) An induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 19:585–593
Sears ER (1982) A wheat mutation conditioning an intermediate level of homeologous chromosome pairing. Can J Genet Cytol 24:715–719
Selva EM, New L, Crouse GF, Lahue RS (1995) Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139:1175–1188
Sidhu GK, Rustgi S, Shafqat MN, von Wettstein D, Gill KS (2008) Fine structure mapping of a gene-rich region of wheat carrying Ph1, a suppressor of crossing over between homoeologous chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5815–5820
Song XL, Sun XZ, Zhang TZ (2006) Segregation distortion and its effect on genetic mapping in plants. Chin J Agr Biotechnol 3:163–169
Spampanito CP, Gomez RL, Galles C, Lario LD (2009) From bacteria to plants: a compendium of mismatch repair essays. Mutat Res 682:110–128
Surtees JA, Argueso JL, Alani E (2004) Mismatch repair proteins: key regulators of genetic recombination. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:146–159
Tam SM, Samipak S, Britt A, Chetelat RT (2009) Characterization and comparative sequence analysis of the DNA mismatch repair MSH2 and MSH7 genes from tomato. Genetica 137:341–354
Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066
Trouiller B, Schaefer DG, Charlot F, Nogué F (2006) MSH2 is essential for the preservation of genome integrity and prevents homeologous recombination in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Nucl Acids Res 34:232–242
Wijnker E, de Jong H (2008) Managing meiotic recombination in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci 13:640–646
Wu SY, Culligan K, Lamers M, Hays JB (2003) Dissimilar mispair-recognition spectra of Arabidopsis DNA-mismatch-repair proteins MSH2*MSH6 (MutSα) and MSH2*MSH7 (MutSγ). Nucl Acids Res 31:6027–6034
Yousafzai FK, Al-Kaff N, Moore G (2010) Structural and functional relationship between the Ph1 locus protein 5B2 in wheat and CDK2 in mammals. Funct Integr Genom 10:157–166
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff of the C.M. Rick Tomato Genetics Resource Center (especially Katie Schuller-Smith) for providing the substitution lines and plant horticultural assistance. This research was supported by grants from the USDA-NRI, 99-35300-7683, and 05-35301-15736.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Heslop-Harrison.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tam, S.M., Hays, J.B. & Chetelat, R.T. Effects of suppressing the DNA mismatch repair system on homeologous recombination in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 123, 1445–1458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1679-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1679-4