Abstract
In spite of commercial use of heterosis in agriculture, the molecular basis of heterosis is poorly understood. In this study, heterosis was estimated for eight root traits in 20 wheat hybrids derived from a NC Design II mating scheme. Positive mid-parent heterosis was detected in 96 of 160 hybrid–trait combinations, and positive high-parent heterosis was detected in 79 of 160 hybrid-trait combinations. Improved differential display was used to analyze alterations in gene expression between hybrids and their parents in roots at the jointing stage. More than 990 fragments were repeatedly displayed, among which 27.52% were differentially expressed between hybrids and their parents. Four differential expression patterns were observed. Thirty differentially expressed cDNA fragments and three genes with open reading frames were cloned, and their expression patterns were confirmed by reverse-northern blot and semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis, respectively. We concluded that these differentially expressed genes, though mostly with unknown function, could play important roles for hybrids to demonstrate heterosis in root system traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aeschbacher RA, Schiefelbein KW, Benfey PN (1994) The genetic and molecular basis of root development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:25–45
Auger DL, Gray AD, Ream TS, Kato A, Coe EH Jr, Birchler JA (2005) Nonadditive gene expression in diploid and triploid hybrids of maize. Genetics 169:389–397
Birchler JA, Auger DL, Riddle NC (2003) In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell 15:2236–2239
Broughton WT, Dilworth MJ (1971) Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans. Biochem J 125:1075–1080
Brouwer R (1983) Functional equilibrium, sense or nonsense? Neth J Agric Sci 31:335–348
Bruce AB (1910) The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32:627–628
Carroll AD, Moyen C, Van Kesteren P, Tooke F, Battey NH, Brownlee C (1998) Ca, annexins, and GTP modulate exocytosis from maize root cap protoplasts. Plant Cell 10:1267–1276
Chen NH, Yang JS, Gao YP, Xiao ML Qian M (1996) Differential display of mRNA between hybrid F1 and its parental inbred lines. Chin Sci Bull 41:939–943
Chen NH, Gao YP, Yang JS, Qian M, Ge KL (1997) Alteration of gene expression in rice hybrid F1 and its parental seedlings. Acta Bot Sin 39:379–382
Clark GB, Sessions A, Eastburn DJ, Roux SJ (2001) Differential expression of members of the annexin family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126:1072–1084
Cook-Johnson RJ, Zhang Q, Wiskich JT, Soole KL (1999) The nuclear origin of the non-phosphorylating NADH dehydrogenases of plant mitochondria. FEBS Letters 454:37–41
Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28:454–455
Diaz I, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Abraham Z, Martinez M, Moneda II-L, Carbonero P (2002) The GAMYB protein from barley interacts with the DOF transcription factor BPBF and activates endosperm-specific genes during seed development. Plant J 29(4):453–464
Duvick DN (1997) Heterosis: feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 19–29
East EM (1908) Inbreeding in corn. Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for years 1907–1908, pp 419–428
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK
Favery B, Ryan E, Foreman J, Linstead P, Boudonck K, Steer M, Shaw P, Dolan L (2001) KOJAK encodes a cellulose synthase-like protein required for root hair cell morphogenesis in Arabidosis. Genes Dev 15(1):79–89
Fohse D, Claassen N, Jungk A (1988) Phosphorus efficiency of plants I: external and internal P requirement and P uptake efficiency of different plant species. Plant Soil 110:101–109
Frahm MA, Foster EF, Kelly JD (2003) Indirect screening techniques for drought resistance in dry bean. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 46:87–88
Gaedeke N, Klein M, Kolukisaoglu U, Forestier C, Müller A, Ansorge M, Becker D, Mamnun Y, Kuchler K, Schulz B, Mueller-Roeber B, Martinoia E (2001) The Arabidopsis thaliana ABC transporter AtMRP5 controls root development and stomata movement. EMBO J 20(8):1875–1887
Harris GA, Campbell GS (1989) Automated quantification of roots using a simple image analyzer. Agron J 81:935–938
Hauser MT, Morikami A, Benfey PN (1995) Conditional root expansion mutants of Arabidopsis. Development 121:1237–1252
Hua JP, Xing YZ, Wu WR, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang QF (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2574–2579
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7362–7366
von der Kammer H, Albrecht C, Mayhans M, Hoffman B, Stanke G, Nitsch RM (1999) Identification of genes regulated by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: application of an improved and statistically comprehensive mRNA differential display technique. Nucleic Acids Res 27:2211–2218
Keller B, Lamb CJ (1989) Specific expression of a novel cell-wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein gene in lateral root initiation. Genes Dev 3:1639–1646
Kieliszewski ME, Lamport DTA (1994) Extensin: repetitive motifs, functional sites, post-translational codes, and phylogeny. Plant J 5:157–172
Kovacs I, Ayaydin F, Oberschall A, Ipacs I, Bottka S, Dudits D, Toth EC (1998) Immunolocalization of a novel annexin-like protein encode by a stress and abscisic acid responsive gene in alfalfa. Plant J 15:185–197
Leuchter R, Wolf K, Zimmermann M (1998) Isolation of an Arabidopsis cDNA complementing a Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant deficient in phytochelatin synthesis. Plant Physiol 117:1526
Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, Ying CS, Stansel JW, Ghush WS, Paterson AH (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158:1737–1753
Li YH, Qian Q, Zhou YH, Yan MX, Sun L, Zhang M, Fu ZM, Wang YH, Han B, Pang XM, Chen MS, Li JY (2003) BRITTLE CULM1, which encodes a COBRA-like protein, affects the mechanical properties of rice plants. Plant Cell 15:2020–2031
Liu LX, Huang TC, Liu GT, Zhang SZ (1992) Stability analysis of yield and quality characters of hybrid and pureline winter wheat cultivars. Acta Agronomic Sin 181:38–49
Luo LJ, Li ZK, Mei HW, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, Ying CS, Stansel JW, Ghush WS, Paterson AH (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158:1755–1771
Mena M, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Schmidt RJ, Carbonero P (1998) An endosperm-specific DOF protein from barley, highly conserved in wheat, binds to and cativates transcription from the prolamin-box of a native Bhordein promoter in barley endosperm. Plant J 16:53–62
Mena M, Cejudo FJ, Isabel-Lamoneda I, Carbonero P (2002) A role for the DOF transcription factor BPBF in the regulation of gibberellin-responsive genes in barley aleurone. Plant Physiol 130:111–119
Merkouropoulos G, Barnett DC, Shirsat AH (1999) The Arabidopsis extensin gene is developmentally regulated, is induced by wounding, methyl jasmonate, abscisic and salicylic acid, and codes for a protein with unusual motifs. Planta 208:212–219
Meyer RC, Torjek O, Becher M, Altmann T (2004) Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis establishment during early development. Plant Physiol 134:1813–1823
Perrin RM (2001) Cellulose:how many cellulose synthases to make a plant? Curr Biol 11(6):213–216
Plaumann M, Pelzer-Reith B, Martin WF, Schnarrenberger C (1997) Multiple recruitment of class-I aldolase to chloroplasts and eubacterial origin of eukaryotic class- II ldolases revealed by cDNAs from Euglena gracilis. Curr Genet 31:430–438
Reiter Wolf-Dieter (1998) The molecular analysis of cell wall components. Trends Plant Sci 3 (1):27–32
Romagnoli S, Maddaloni M, Livini C, Motto M (1990) Relationship between gene expression and hybrid vigor in primary root tips of young maize Zea mays L. plantlets. Theor Appl Genet 80:767–775
Roudier F, Schindelman G, DeSalle R, Benfey PN (2002) The COBRA family of putative GPI-anchored proteins in Arabidopsis, a new fellowship in expansion. Plant Physiol 130:538–548
Samad MA, Meisner CA, Rahman A, Rahman M, Duxbury JM, Lauren JG (2002) Wheat root growth in phosphorus depleted soils. In: Symposium of the 17th international soil science congress for August 2002, Thailand, pp. 14–21
SAS Institute (1999) SAS statistical package for Windows, v. 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary
Schiefelbein JW, Masucci JD, Wang H (1997) Building a root: the control of patterning and morphogenesis during root development. Plant Cell 9:1089–1098
Schindelman G, Morikami A, Jung J, Baskin TI, Carpita NC, Derbyshire P, McCann MC, Benfey PN (2001) COBRA encodes a putative GPI-anchored protein, which is polarly localized and necessary for oriented cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 15:1115–1127
Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Am Breed Assoc 4:296–301
Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839
Sun QX, Wu LM, Ni ZF, Meng FR, Wang ZK, Lin Z (2004) Differential gene expression patterns in leaves between hybrids and their parental inbreds are correlated with heterosis in a diallel cross. Plant Sci 166:651–657
Tam YY, Epstein E, Normanly J (2000) Characterization of auxin conjugates in Arabidopsis. Low steady-state levels of indole-3-acetylaspartate, indole-3-acetyl-glutamate, indole-3-acetyl-glucose. Plant Physiol 123:589–596
Tsaftaris SA (1995) Molecular aspects of heterosis in plants. Physiol Plant 94:362–370
Tsaftaris SA, Kafka M (1998) Mechanisms of heterosis in crop plants. J Crop Prod 1:95–111
Wang ZK, Ni ZF, Meng FR, Wu LM, Xie XD, Sun QX (2003) Relationship between differential gene expression patterns in the root of jointing stage and heterosis in agronomic traits in a wheat diallel cross. Sci Agric Sin 365:473–479
Wu LM, Ni ZF, Wang ZK, Lin Z, Sun QX (2001) Relationship between differential gene expression patterns of multigene families and heterosis in a wheat diallel crosses. Acta Genet Sin 28:256–266
Wu LM, Ni ZF, Meng FR, Lin Z, Sun QX (2003) Cloning and characterization of leaf cDNAs that are differentially expressed between wheat hybrids and their parents. Mol Genet Genomics 270:281–286
Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745–754
Xiong LZ, Yang GP, Xu CG, Zhang QF, Maroof MAS (1998) Relationships of differential gene expression in leaves with heterosis and heterozygosity in a rice diallel cross. Mol Breed 4:129–136
Yabba MD, Foster EF (2003) Common bean root response to abscisic acid treatment. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 46:85–86
Yanagisawa S (2002) The Dof family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 7:555–560
Yu S, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang QF, Maroof MAS (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9226–9231
Acknowledgments
Assistance from Prof. Zhang Fusuo (CAU) for root quantification is greatly appreciated. This work was financially supported by the State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China (2001CB1088), National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (39925026) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (30270824).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Mather
Z. Wang and Z. Ni contributed to this article equally.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Ni, Z., Wu, H. et al. Heterosis in root development and differential gene expression between hybrids and their parental inbreds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 113, 1283–1294 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0382-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0382-3