Skip to main content
Log in

Qualitätssicherung in der Einführung neuer operativer Methoden

Da Vinci-Robotersysteme

Quality control in the implementation of new surgical procedures

Da Vinci robot-assisted systems

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In der operativen Therapie urologischer Tumoren erlangen zunehmend roboterassistierte Verfahren an Bedeutung. Die Qualität dieser neuen muss ebenso wie die bereits etablierter Methoden durch geeignete Instrumente kontrolliert und bewertet werden. Neben der genauen Charakterisierung des operierten Patientenkollektivs ist dabei die Erfassung allgemeiner sowie operationsspezifischer Parameter im kurz- und langfristigen Verlauf notwendig. Hierzu sollen möglichst genau definierte, validierte Instrumente der Qualitätssicherung verwendet werden. Nur so ist gewährleistet, dass sowohl die onkologische als auch die funktionelle Qualität der Robotereingriffe untereinander als auch zu den herkömmlichen Verfahren verglichen werden können.

Abstract

Robot assistance in the surgical treatment of urological malignancies is gaining increasing importance. As is the case in already established surgical procedures, the quality of robot-assisted surgery needs to be controlled and evaluated by appropriate measures. Baseline-parameters of treated patients should be documented precisely. General and operation type-specific parameters should be evaluated in short- as well as in mid-term follow-up. Appropriate and validated instruments should be used. Only by using these measures will it be possible to compare robot-assisted procedures of different institutions and historical data of conventional surgery with regard to oncological and functional efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Albers P, Jahkse G (2005) Qualitätssicherung der radikalen Prostatektomie. Dtsch Aeztebl 102:3582–3586

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakenberg OW (2010) Moving towards evidence-based surgery. Eur Urol 57:202–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. May M, Herrmann E, Bolenz C et al (2011) Association between the number of dissected lymph nodes during pelvic lymphadenectomy and cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node-negative urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18(7):2018–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Niegisch G, Rabenalt R, Albers P (2011) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Pilot study for the prospective evaluation of perioperative parameters compared to open radical cystectomy. Urologe A (Epub ahead of print), doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2580-0

  6. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55:164–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma NL, Papadopoulos A, Lee D et al (2010) First 500 cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from a single UK centre: learning curves of two surgeons. BJU Int (Epub ahead of print), doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09941.x

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Niegisch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niegisch, G., Rabenalt, R. & Albers, P. Qualitätssicherung in der Einführung neuer operativer Methoden. Urologe 50, 1288–1290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-011-2656-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-011-2656-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation