Skip to main content
Log in

Organerhaltende Chirurgie des Peniskarzinoms

Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Beim Peniskarzinom ist die Lebensqualität der Patienten besonders eng mit dem Organerhalt verknüpft. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurden für diese seltene jedoch aggressive Tumorentität verschiedene Operationsverfahren wie die mikrographische Chirurgie, die Lasertherapie und die Glansektomie entwickelt. Diese sollen dem Patienten ein Höchstmaß an onkologischer Sicherheit bei gleichzeitigem Erhalt der Sexualfunktion bieten. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über die etablierten Behandlungsoptionen sowie die Indikation und Grenzen der organerhaltenden Therapie des Peniskarzinoms.

Abstract

In patients with penile cancer health-related quality of life is closely related to organ-sparing surgery. To achieve an ideally suited treatment modality for this rare but aggressive tumor entity different operating techniques like micrographic surgery, laser treatment, and glansectomy were developed. These should offer optimal oncological treatment while preserving sexual function. This article gives an overview of indications and limits of organ-sparing treatment in penile cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Brown MD, Zachary CB, Grekin RC et al. (1987) Penile tumors: their management by Mohs micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13: 1163–1167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgers JK, Badalament RA, Drago JR (1992) Penile cancer. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and staging. Urol Clin North Am 19: 247–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crook J, Grimard L, Tsihlias J et al. (2002) Interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancer: an alternative to amputation. J Urol 167: 506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cubilla AL, Meijer CJ, Young RH (2000) Morphological features of epithelial abnormalities and precancerous lesions of the penis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 205(Suppl): 215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delannes M, Malavaud B, Douchez J et al. (1992) Iridium-192 interstitial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24: 479–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Demkow T (1999) The treatment of penile carcinoma: experience in 64 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 31: 525–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frimberger D, Hungerhuber E, Zaak D et al. (2002) Penile carcinoma. Is Nd: YAG laser therapy radical enough? J Urol 168: 2418–2421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frimberger D, Schneede P, Hungerhuber E et al. (2002) Autofluorescence and 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence diagnosis of penile carcinoma – new techniques to monitor Nd: YAG laser therapy. Urol Res 30: 295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hakenberg OW, Wirth MP (1999) Issues in the treatment of penile carcinoma. A short review. Urol Int 62: 229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horenblas S, Kroger R, Gallee MP et al. (1994) Ultrasound in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; a useful addition to clinical staging? A comparison of ultrasound with histopathology. Urology 43: 702–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horenblas S, Van Tinteren H (1994) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol 151: 1239–1243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Horenblas S, Van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF et al. (1992) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. II. Treatment of the primary tumor. J Urol 147: 1533–1538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lont AP, Besnard AP, Gallee MP et al. (2003) A comparison of physical examination and imaging in determining the extent of primary penile carcinoma. BJU Int 91: 493–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahlmann B, Doehn C, Feyerabend T (2001) Radiotherapy of penis carcinoma. Urologe A 40: 308–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mcdougal WS (2005) Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 174: 2218–2220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P et al. (2005) What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int 96: 1040–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohs FE, Snow SN, Larson PO (1992) Mohs micrographic surgery for penile tumors. Urol Clin North Am 19: 291–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A et al. (1994) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151: 1244–1249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Lazzeri M et al. (2007) Resurfacing and reconstruction of the glans penis. Eur Urol 52: 893–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Persson B, Sjodin JG, Holmberg L et al. (2007) The National Penile Cancer Register in Sweden 2000–2003. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41: 278–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pietrzak P, Corbishley C, Watkin N (2004) Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int 94: 1253–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pizzocaro G, Piva L, Bandieramonte G et al. (1997) Up-to-date management of carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol 32: 5–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prowse DM, Ktori EN, Chandrasekaran D et al. (2008) Human papillomavirus-associated increase in p16INK4A expression in penile lichen sclerosus and squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 158: 261–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA et al. (2005) Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 66: 1292–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shindel AW, Mann MW, Lev RY et al. (2007) Mohs micrographic surgery for penile cancer: management and long-term followup. J Urol 178: 1980–1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith Y, Hadway P, Biedrzycki O et al. (2007) Reconstructive surgery for invasive squamous carcinoma of the glans penis. Eur Urol 52: 1179–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S et al. (2004) EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer. Eur Urol 46: 1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Solsona E, Iborra I, Rubio J et al. (2001) Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol 165: 1506–1509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Windahl T, Skeppner E, Andersson SO et al. (2004) Sexual function and satisfaction in men after laser treatment for penile carcinoma. J Urol 172: 648–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Schlenker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlenker, B., Gratzke, C., Tilki, D. et al. Organerhaltende Chirurgie des Peniskarzinoms. Urologe 47, 803–808 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1710-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1710-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation