Skip to main content
Log in

SPECT/CT-Infektdiagnostik am Skelett

SPECT/CT diagnostics for skeletal infections

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Knöcherne Infekte stellen nicht selten eine diagnostische und klinische Herausforderung dar.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Nuklearmedizinische Standardverfahren für die Diagnostik akuter und chronischer Knocheninfekte sind die Mehrphasenskelettszintigraphie und die Infektszintigraphie mit markierten Leukozyten.

Methodische Innovationen

Die Einführung von Hybridtechnologien wie der SPECT/CT hat die nuklearmedizinische Infektbildgebung tiefgreifend verändert.

Leistungsfähigkeit

Die SPECT/CT erlaubt bei der Frage nach Knocheninfekten insgesamt eine wesentlich genauere Beurteilung als planare Aufnahmen und SPECT.

Bewertung

Die integrierte Akquisition von metabolischer, funktioneller und topographisch-morphologischer Information mit SPECT/CT steigerte insbesondere die Spezifität der Mehrphasenskelettszintigraphie und der Infektszintigraphie mit markierten Leukozyten.

Abstract

Clinical/methodical issue

Skeletal infections are often a diagnostic and clinical challenge.

Standard radiological methods

Nuclear imaging modalities used in the diagnostic workup of acute and chronic skeletal infections include three-phase bone scintigraphy and scintigraphy with labelled leucocytes.

Methodical innovations

The introduction of hybrid technologies, such as single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has dramatically changed nuclear medical imaging of infections.

Performance

In general SPECT/CT leads to a considerably more accurate diagnosis than planar or SPECT imaging.

Achievements

Given the integrated acquisition of metabolic, functional and morphological information, SPECT/CT has increased in particular the specificity of three-phase skeletal scanning and scintigraphy with labeled leucocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L et al (2006) SPECT/CT using 67 Ga and 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for diagnosis of infection. J Nucl Med 47:587–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker W, Palestro CJ, Winship J et al (1996) Rapid imaging of infections with a monoclonal antibody fragment (LeukoScan). Clin Orthop Relat Res (329):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Capriotti G, Chianelli M, Signore A (2006) Nuclear medicine imaging of diabetic foot infection: results of meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 27:757–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Djekidel M, Brown RK, Piert M (2011) Benefits of hybrid SPECT/CT for (111)In-oxine- and Tc-99m-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-labeled leukocyte imaging. Clin Nucl Med 36:e50–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Filippi L, Schillaci O (2006) Usefulness of hybrid SPECT/CT in 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for bone and joint infections. J Nucl Med 47:1908–1913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippi L, Uccioli L, Giurato L et al (2009) Diabetic foot infection: usefulness of SPECT/CT for 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte imaging. J Nucl Med 50:1042–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graute V, Feist M, Lehner S et al (2010) Detection of low-grade prosthetic joint infections using 99mTc-antigranulocyte SPECT/CT: initial clinical results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1751–1759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heiba SI, Kolker D, Mocherla B et al (2010) The optimized evaluation of diabetic foot infection by dual isotope SPECT/CT imaging protocol. J Foot Ankle Surg 49:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horger M, Eschmann SM, Pfannenberg C et al (2007) Added value of SPECT/CT in patients suspected of having bone infection: preliminary results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:211–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klaeser B, Spanjol P, Wartenberg J, Krause TM (2008) Bone scan: impact of education and professional experience on the assessment of planar bone scans, SPECT and SPECT-CT. Nuklearmedizin 03:A134

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linke R, Kuwert T, Uder M et al (2010) Skeletal SPECT/CT of the peripheral extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurer AH, Chen DC, Camargo EE et al (1981) Utility of three-phase skeletal scintigraphy in suspected osteomyelitis: concise communication. J Nucl Med 22:941–949

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson HT, Taylor A (1980) Bone scanning in the diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis. Eur J Nucl Med 5:267–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pakos EE, Koumoulis HD, Fotopoulos AD et al (2007) Osteomyelitis: antigranulocyte scintigraphy with 99mTC radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis – meta-analysis. Radiology 245:732–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palestro CJ, Kipper SL, Weiland FL et al (2002) Osteomyelitis: diagnosis with (99m)Tc-labeled antigranulocyte antibodies compared with diagnosis with (111)In-labeled leukocytes–initial experience. Radiology 223:758–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prandini N, Lazzeri E, Rossi B et al (2006) Nuclear medicine imaging of bone infections. Nucl Med Commun 27:633–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M et al (2006) SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med 47:1102–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubello D, Rampin L, Banti E et al (2008) Antigranulocyte scintigraphy in infected hip prosthesis: the diagnostic importance of delayed 20–24-h imaging and semiquantitative analysis. Nucl Med Commun 29:994–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schauwecker DS (1992) The scintigraphic diagnosis of osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:9–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinstrasser A, Oberhausen E (1996) Granulocyte labelling kit BW 250/183 – results of the European Multicenter Trial. Nuklearmedizin 35:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Turpin S, Lambert R (2001) Role of scintigraphy in musculoskeletal and spinal infections. Radiol Clin North Am 39:169–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Acker F, Nuyts J, Maes A et al (2001) FDG-PET, 99mtc-HMPAO white blood cell SPET and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasties. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1496–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vittorini E, Del Giudice E, Pizzoli A et al (2005) MRI versus scintigraphy with 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled granulocytes in the diagnosis of bone infection. Radiol Med 109:395–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner T, Payoux P, Simon J et al (2010) Discordance between labelled white blood cell scintigraphy and bone scan following suspicion of bone infection: what should be done about it? Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 13:5–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung hin: Dr. Klaeser hat Honorare für Vorträge von der Firma Philips AG Healthcare erhalten.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Klaeser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaeser, B., Spanjol, M. & Krause, T. SPECT/CT-Infektdiagnostik am Skelett. Radiologe 52, 615–620 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-011-2272-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-011-2272-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation