Skip to main content
Log in

Antiepileptika bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter und in der Schwangerschaft

Vergleich der Fachinformationen in Deutschland und der Schweiz mit dem aktuellen Wissensstand

Antiepileptics in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy

Comparison of specialized information with the current state of knowledge in Germany and Switzerland

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Viele Heilberufler nutzen Fachinformationen als eine von verschiedenen möglichen Informationsquellen zu Risiken einer Arzneimittelanwendung bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter und in der Schwangerschaft. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, eine Übersicht über das teratogene Potenzial verschiedener Antiepileptika zu präsentieren und mit den Angaben ausgewählter Fachinformationen zu vergleichen.

Methoden

Es wurde eine Literaturrecherche zum teratogenen Risiko von 19 Antiepileptika durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit den Angaben der Fachinformationen von 38 in der Schweiz und in Deutschland erhältlichen Fertigarzneimitteln verglichen.

Ergebnisse

In allen Fachinformationen wird das teratogene Risiko anhand epidemiologischer Daten diskutiert. Eine Quantifizierung des Fehlbildungsrisikos und die Anzahl dokumentierter Schwangerschaften fehlen jedoch meistens. Angaben zur Notwendigkeit der Überwachung von Plasmaspiegeln während der Schwangerschaft mit etwaiger Dosisanpassung fehlen in fünf schweizer und zwei deutschen Fachinformationen.

Diskussion

Die Angaben in den Fachinformationen der untersuchten Antiepileptika zur Anwendung bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter und in der Schwangerschaft sind heterogen und entsprechen überwiegend nicht dem aktuellen Kenntnisstand. Eine durch die zuständigen Behörden angestoßene Überarbeitung der Fachinformationen scheint notwendig zu sein, damit diese Dokumente für Heilberufler tatsächlich von Nutzen sein können.

Summary

Background

Healthcare professionals regularly read the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) as one of the various sources of information on the risks of drug use in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy. The aim of this article is to present an overview of the teratogenic potential of various antiepileptic drugs and to compare these data with the information provided by the SmPCs.

Methods

A literature search on the teratogenic risks of 19 antiepileptic agents was conducted and the results were compared with the information on the use in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy provided by the SmPCs of 38 commercial products available in Switzerland and Germany.

Results

The teratogenic risk is discussed in all available SmPCs. Quantification of the risk for birth defects and the numbers of documented pregnancies are mostly missing. Reproductive safety information in SmPCs showed poor concordance with risk levels reported in the literature. Recommendations concerning the need to monitor plasma levels and possibly perform dose adjustments during pregnancy to prevent treatment failure were missing in five Swiss and two German SmPCs.

Discussion

The information regarding use in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy provided by the SmPCs is heterogeneous and poorly reflects the current state of knowledge. Regular updates of SmPCs are warranted in order for these documents to be of reliable use for health care professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Jaquet A, Winterfeld U, Meyer Y et al (2011) Evaluation of risk perception related to drug use during pregnancy: a Swiss survey. Reprod Toxicol 31:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meador K, Reynolds MW, Crean S et al (2008) Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts. Epilepsy Res 81:1–13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wlodarczyk BJ, Palacios AM, George TM et al (2012) Antiepileptic drugs and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Med Genet A 158A:2071–2090

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaefer C, Spielmann H, Vetter K et al (2012) Arzneimittel in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit, 8. Aufl. Elsevier GmbH, München

  5. Briggs G, Freeman R, Sumner J (2011) Drugs in pregnancy and lactation, 9. Aufl. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

  6. Reprotox. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/

  7. Kaneko S, Battino D, Andermann E et al (1999) Congenital malformations due to antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Res 33:145–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrow J, Russell A, Guthrie E et al (2006) Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a prospective study from the UK epilepsy and pregnancy register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:193–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Samren EB, Duijn CM van, Christiaens GC et al (1999) Antiepileptic drug regimens and major congenital abnormalities in the offspring. Ann Neurol 46:739–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E et al (2011) Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol 10:609–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaaja E, Kaaja R, Hiilesmaa V (2003) Major malformations in offspring of women with epilepsy. Neurology 60:575–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry (2012) Registry publishes monotherapy findings: comparative safety of 11 antiepileptic drugs used during pregnancy. http://www.aedpregnancyregistry.org/

  13. Matalon S, Schechtman S, Goldzweig G et al (2002) The teratogenic effect of carbamazepine: a meta-analysis of 1255 exposures. Reprod Toxicol 16:9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borthen I, Eide MG, Veiby G et al (2009) Complications during pregnancy in women with epilepsy: population-based cohort study. BJOG 116:1736–1742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunnington MC, Weil JG, Messenheimer JA et al (2011) Final results from 18 years of the International Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry. Neurology 76:1817–1823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mawhinney E, Craig J, Morrow J et al (2013) Levetiracetam in pregnancy: results from the UK and Ireland epilepsy and pregnancy registers. Neurology 80:400–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jentink J, Loane MA, Dolk H et al (2010) Valproic acid monotherapy in pregnancy and major congenital malformations. N Engl J Med 362:2185–2193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Margulis AV, Mitchell AA, Gilboa SM et al (2012) Use of topiramate in pregnancy and risk of oral clefts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:405 e1–7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunt S, Russell A, Smithson WH et al (2008) Topiramate in pregnancy: preliminary experience from the UK epilepsy and pregnancy register. Neurology 71:272–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jentink J, Dolk H, Loane MA et al (2010) Intrauterine exposure to carbamazepine and specific congenital malformations: systematic review and case-control study. BMJ 341:c6581

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N et al (2013) Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 12:244–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scolnik D, Nulman I, Rovet J et al (1994) Neurodevelopment of children exposed in utero to phenytoin and carbamazepine monotherapy. JAMA 271:767–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanoverloop D, Schnell RR, Harvey EA et al (1992) The effects of prenatal exposure to phenytoin and other anticonvulsants on intellectual function at 4 to 8 years of age. Neurotoxicol Teratol 14:329–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings C, Stewart M, Stevenson M et al (2011) Neurodevelopment of children exposed in utero to lamotrigine, sodium valproate and carbamazepine. Arch Dis Child 96:643–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reinisch JM, Sanders SA, Mortensen EL et al (1995) In utero exposure to phenobarbital and intelligence deficits in adult men. JAMA 274:1518–1525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaffield ME, Culwell KR, Lee CR (2011) The use of hormonal contraception among women taking anticonvulsant therapy. Contraception 83:16–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Doose DR, Brodie MJ, Wilson EA et al (2003) Topiramate and lamotrigine pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy in epilepsy patients. Epilepsia 44:917–922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fattore C, Cipolla G, Gatti G et al (1999) Induction of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel metabolism by oxcarbazepine in healthy women. Epilepsia 40:783–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saano V, Glue P, Banfield CR et al (1995) Effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 58:523–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arzneimittelinformations-Publikationsplattform Swissmedic. http://www.swissmedicinfo.ch/

  31. Sidhu J, Job S, Singh S et al (2006) The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of the co-administration of lamotrigine and a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 61:191–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabers A, Tomson T (2009) Managing antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and lactation. Curr Opin Neurol 22:157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. U. Winterfeld, V. Gotta, L.E. Rothuizen, A. Panchaud, A.O. Rossetti und T. Buclin geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Winterfeld PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winterfeld, U., Gotta, V., Rothuizen, L. et al. Antiepileptika bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter und in der Schwangerschaft. Nervenarzt 85, 738–746 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-014-4091-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-014-4091-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation