Skip to main content
Log in

Neuentwicklungen in der Pharmakotherapie der Depression

  • Übersicht
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Trotz aller Fortschritte in den letzten Jahren stellt die Pharmakotherapie der Depression immer noch eine beträchtliche Herausforderung für den Psychiater dar. Ein besonderes Problem ist die Latenz bis zum Eintreten der antidepressiven Wirkung von bis zu mehreren Wochen bei allen bislang auf dem Markt befindlichen Präparaten. Die Non-Response-Quote für Antidepressiva liegt bei ca. 30%, ferner weisen die verfügbaren Antidepressiva ein charakteristisches Nebenwirkungsspektrum auf. Die gängigen pharmakologischen antidepressiven Therapieansätze zielen auf eine Verbesserung der serotonergen bzw. noradrenergen Neurotransmission ab. Mittlerweile gibt es jedoch auch völlig neuartige pharmakologische Interventionsstrategien. Plazebokontrollierte Doppelblindstudien, welche für eine mögliche antidepressive Wirkung dieser Substanzen sprechen, wurden mit 5-HT1A-Rezeptor-Agonisten und Tachykininrezeptorantagonisten durchgeführt. Wenn sich auch in tierexperimentellen Untersuchungen, Kasuistiken, offenen sowie plazebokontrollierten Studien mit relativ kleiner Fallzahl erste Hinweise für eine antidepressive Wirksamkeit durch Intervention an verschiedenen Angriffsorten innerhalb des Hypothalamus-Hypophysen-Nebennierenrinden-Systems, wie z. B. durch CRH1-Rezeptor-Antagonisten, Steroidsynthesehemmer und Glukokortikoidrezeptorantagonisten, finden lassen, wurde bislang ein hinreichender Nachweis für deren klinische Wirksamkeit, wie sie für die Prüfung von Antidepressiva gefordert werden, noch nicht erbracht. Die dargestellten neuartigen Therapieprinzipien in der Depressionsbehandlung sollten jedoch unbedingt weiterverfolgt werden, um die Behandelbarkeit von Depressionen, auch aufgrund deren großer gesundheitspolitischer Relevanz, weiter zu verbessern.

Summary

In spite of recent progress in the pharmacotherapy of depression, major issues are still unresolved. These include the nonresponse rate of approximately 30% to conventional antidepressant pharmacotherapy, side effects of available antidepressants, and the latency period of several weeks until clinical improvement. Current treatment strategies aim to enhance serotonergic and/or noradrenergic neurotransmission. However, in the meantime, several new pharmacological principles are under investigation with regard to their antidepressant potency. Placebo-controlled, double-blind studies have been performed with 5-HT1A receptor agonists and tachykinin receptor antagonists which point towards antidepressant efficacy. While there is some evidence for putative antidepressant properties of various interventions within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system such as CRH1 receptor antagonists, steroid synthesis inhibitors, and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists in animal studies, case series, open studies, and small placebo-controlled studies, no definite proof for their antidepressant efficacy has been furnished. Nevertheless, follow-up of new pharmacological strategies is of major importance to provide even better strategies for the clinical management of depression, which also has great socioeconomic impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1.
Abb. 2.

Literatur

  1. Anand A, Malison RT, McDougle CJ, Price LH (1995) Antiglucocorticoid treatment of refractory depression with ketoconazole: a case report. Biol Psychiatry 37:338–340

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arborelius L, Skelton KH, Thrivikraman KV, Plotsky PM, Schulz DW, Owens MJ (2000) Chronic administration of the selective corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptor antagonist CP-154,526: behavioral, endocrine and neurochemical effects in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 294:588–597

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baghai TC, Schule C, Zwanzger P et al. (2001) Possible influence of the insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene on therapeutic outcome in affective disorders. Mol Psychiatry 6:258–259

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baghai TC, Schule C, Zwanzger P et al. (2002) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis dysregulation in patients with major depression is influenced by the insertion/deletion polymorphisms of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene. Neurosci Lett 328:299–303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barden N, Reul JMHM, Holsboer F (1995) Do antidepressants stabilize mood through actions on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system? Trends Neurosci 18:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baulieu EE (1996) Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): a fountain of youth? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3147–3151

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belanoff JK, Flores BH, Kalezhan M, Sund B, Schatzberg AF (2001) Rapid reversal of psychotic depression using mifepristone. J Clin Psychopharmacol 21:516–521

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bitran D, Hilvers RJ, Kellogg CK (1991) Anxiolytic effects of 3α-hydroxy-5α [β]-pregnan-20-one: endogenous metabolites of progesterone that are active at the GABAA receptor. Brain Res 561:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blakely RD (2001) Physiological genomics of antidepressant targets: keeping the periphery in mind. J Neurosci 21:8319–8323

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bondy B, Baghai TC, Minov C et al. (2003) Substance P serum levels are increased in major depression: preliminary results. Biol Psychiatry 53: 538–542

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brady LS, Whitfield HJ, Fox RJ, Gold PW, Herkenham M (1991) Long-term antidepressant administration alters corticotropin-releasing hormone, tyrosine hydroxylase, and mineralocorticoid receptor gene expression in rat brain. J Clin Invest 87:831–837

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke MJ, Preskorn SH (1995) Short term treatment of mood disorders with standard antidepressants. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: The fourth generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 1053–1065

  13. Charney DS, Grothe DR, Smith SL et al. (2002) Overview of psychiatric disorders and the role of newer antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 63:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feiger AD (1996) A double-blind comparison of gepirone extended release, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of outpatient major depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 32:659–665

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flood JF, Smith GE, Roberts E (1988) Dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfate enhance memory retention in mice. Brain Res 447:269–278

    Google Scholar 

  16. Foulkes NS, Borjigin J, Snyder SH, Sassone-Corsi P (1997) Rhythmic transcription: the molecular basis of circadian melatonin synthesis. Trends Neurosci 20:487–492

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frazer A (2001) Serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors: prediction of clinical effects from in vitro potencies. J Clin Psychiatry 62:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghadirian AM, Engelsmann F, Dhar V, Filipini D, Keller R, Chouinard G, Murphy BEP (1995) The psychotropic effects of inhibitors of steroid biosynthesis in depressed patients refractory to treatment. Biol Psychiatry 37:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griebel G, Simiand J, Steinberg R et al. (2002) 4-(2-Chloro-4-methoxy-5-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-cyclopropyl-1-(3-fluoro-4- methylphenyl)ethyl]5-methyl-N-(2-propynyl)-1, 3-thiazol-2-amine hydrochloride (SSR125543A), a potent and selective corticotrophin-releasing factor(1) receptor antagonist. II. Characterization in rodent models of stress-related disorders. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:333–345

    Google Scholar 

  20. Healy DG, Harkin A, Cryan JF, Kelly JP, Leonard BE (1999) Metyrapone displays antidepressant-like properties in preclinical paradigms. Psychopharmcol 145:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heuser I, Deuschle M, Luppa P, Schweiger U, Standhardt H, Weber B (1998) Increased diurnal plasma concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone in depressed patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3130–3133

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holsboer F (2000) The corticosteroid receptor hypothesis of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:477–501

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holsboer F (2001) Antidepressant drug discovery in the postgenomic era. World J Biol Psychiatry 2:165–177

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holsboer F, Barden N (1996) Antidepressants and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical regulation. Endocr Rev 17:187–205

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holsboer F, Spengler D, Heuser IJ (1992) The role of corticotropin-releasing hormone in the pathogenesis of Cushing's disease, anorexia nervosa, alcoholism, affective disorders and dementia. Prog Brain Res 93:385–417

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keck ME, Welt T, Wigger A, Renner U, Engelmann M, Holsboer F, Landgraf R (2001) The anxiolytic effects of the CRH(1) receptor antagonist depends on innate emotionality in rats. Eur J Neurosci 13:373–380

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kent JM (2000) SNaRIs, NaSSAs, and NaRIs: new agents for the treatment of depression. Lancet 355:911–918

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khisti RT, Chopde CT, Jain SP (2000) Antidepressant-like effect of the neurosteroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one in mice forced swim test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 67:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kramer MS (2002) Clinical update: substance P antagonists in patients with major depression. Eur Psychiatry 17:10

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kramer MS, Cutler N, Feighner J et al. (1998) Distinct mechanism for antidepressant activity by blockade of central substance P receptors. Science 281:1640–1645

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lesieur D, Leclerc V, Chavatte P, Marcot C, Renard P, Guardiola-Lemaitre B (1998) Melatonin: a pertinent prototype for therapeutic intervention. Therapie 53:429–437

    Google Scholar 

  32. Linkowski P, Mendlewicz J, Kerkhofs M et al. (1987) 24-hour profiles of adrenocorticotropin, cortisol, and growth hormone in major depressive illness: effect of antidepressant treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malison RT, Anand A, Pelton GH et al. (1999) Limited efficacy of ketoconazole in treatment-refractory major depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 19:466–470

    Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy BEP (1991) Treatment of major depression with steroid suppressive drugs. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 39:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  35. Murphy BEP, Dhar V, Ghadirian AM, Chouinard G, Keller R (1991) Response to steroid suppression in major depression resistant to antidepressant therapy. J Clin Psychopharmacol 11:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  36. Murphy BEP, Filipini D, Ghadirian AM (1993) Possible use of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of major depression: preliminary results using RU 486. J Psychiatry Neurosci 18:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nemeroff CB, Widerlöv E, Bisette G et al. (1984) Elevated concentrations of CSF corticotropin-releasingfactor- like immunoreactivity in depressed patients. Science 226:1342–1343

    Google Scholar 

  38. O'Dwyer A-M, Lightman SL, Marks MN, Checkley SA (1995) Treatment of major depression with metyrapone and hydrocortisone. J Affect Disord 33:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  39. Okuyama S, Chaki S, Kawashima N et al. (1999) Receptor binding, behavioral, and electrophysiological profiles of nonpeptide corticotropin-releasing factor subtype 1 receptor antagonists CRA1000 and CRA1001. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289:926–935

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pacher P, Kohegyi E, Kecskemeti V, Furst S (2001) Current trends in the development of new antidepressants. Curr Med Chem 8:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  41. Raven PW, O'Dwyer A-M, Taylor NF, Checkley SA (1996) The relationship between the effects of metyrapone treatment on depressed mood and urinary steroid profiles. Psychoneuroendocrinol 21:277–286

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reul JMHM, Stec I, Söder M, Holsboer F (1993) Chronic treatment of rats with the antidepressant amitriptyline attenuates the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenocortical system. Endocrinology 133:312–320

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rupprecht R (1997) The neuropsychopharmacological potential of neuroactive steroids. J Psychiatr Res 31:297–314

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rupprecht R, Holsboer F (1999) Neuroactive steroids: mechanisms of action and neuropsychopharmacological perspectives. Trends Neurosci 22:410–416

    Google Scholar 

  45. Silva RC, Brandao ML (2000) Acute and chronic effects of gepirone and fluoxetine in rats tested in the elevated plus-maze: an ethological analysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sovner R, Fogelman S (2002) Ketoconazole therapy for atypical depression. J Clin Psychiatry 57:227–228

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stahl SM (1998) Selecting an antidepressant by using mechanism of action to enhance efficacy and avoid side effects. J Clin Psychiatry 59:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stout SC, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB (2001) Neurokinin(1) receptor antagonists as potential antidepressants. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41:877–906

    Google Scholar 

  49. Thakore JH, Dinan TG (1995) Cortisol synthesis inhibition: A new treatment strategy for the clinical and endocrine manifestations of depression. Biol Psychiatry 37:364–368

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tuma S, Strubbe JJ, Mocaer E, Koolhaas JM (2002) S20098 affects the free-running rhythms of body temperature and activity and decreases light-induced phase delay of circadian rhythms of the rat. Chronobiol Int 18:781–799

    Google Scholar 

  51. Urani A, Roman FJ, Phan V-L, Su T-P, Maurice T (2001) The antidepressant-like effect induced by σ1-receptor agonists and neuroactive steroids in mice submitted to the forced swimming test. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:1269–1279

    Google Scholar 

  52. Van Reeth O, Olivares E, Zhang Y, Tripathi B, Turek FW (1999) Chronobiotic effects of gepirone, a potential antidepressant with 5HT1A receptor partial agonist properties. Behav Pharmacol 10:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wilcox CS, Ferguson JM, Dale JL, Heiser JF (1996) A double-blind trial of low- and high-dose ranges of gepirone-ER compared with placebo in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacol Bull 32:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Chan T, Manfredi F, Raum W, Johnson R, Canick J (1999) Antiglucocorticoid treatment of depression: double-blind ketoconazole. Biol Psychiatry 45:1070–1074

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Keebler A, Nelson N, Friedland M, Brizendine L, Roberts E (1999) Double-blind treatment of major depression with dehydroepiandrosterone. Am J Psychiatry 156:646–649

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Manfredi F, Ingbar J, Brizendine L, Weingartner H (1993) Ketoconazole administration in hypercortisolemic depression. Am J Psychiatry 150:810–812

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Roberts E et al. (1997) Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) treatment of depression. Biol Psychiatry 41:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zobel AW, Nickel T, Künzel HE, Ackl N, Sonntag A, Ising M, Holsboer F (2000) Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatr Res 34:171–181

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rupprecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rupprecht, R., Baghai, T.C. & Möller, HJ. Neuentwicklungen in der Pharmakotherapie der Depression. Nervenarzt 75, 273–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1517-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1517-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation