Skip to main content
Log in

The role of tending ants in host plant selection and egg parasitism of two facultative myrmecophilous butterflies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ovipositing adult females of myrmecophilous lycaenids are expected to select plants based on ant presence in order to maximize the survivorship of immature stages. Usually, larvae feed ants with honey-like solutions and, in turn, ants ward off parasitoids. Nonetheless, a rarely investigated approach is whether ant partners can also extend their protective behavior towards lycaenids eggs. Here, we investigated the ant-related oviposition pattern of Allosmaitia strophius and Rekoa marius; then, we compared egg parasitism according to the presence of ants. Lycaenid oviposition and egg parasitism (in percent) were experimentally compared in ant-present and ant-excluded treatments. The study plant, Heteropterys byrsonimifolia, is an extrafloral nectaried shrub which supports several ant species. We sampled 280 eggs, of which 39.65 % belonged to A. strophius and 60.35 % to R. marius. Both lycaenids eggs were significantly more abundant on branches with ants, especially those with Camponotus crassus and Camponotus blandus, two ant species known to attend to lycaenids. A. strophius and R. marius parasitism was 4.5- and 2.4-fold higher, respectively, in ant-present treatments, but the results were not statistically significant. Our study shows that ant-mediated host plant selection in lycaenids might be much more widespread than previously thought, and not restricted to obligate myrmecophilous species. Tending ants may be inefficient bodyguards of lycaenid eggs, because unlike larvae which release sugared liquids, eggs do not offer obvious rewards to ants. Ants can ward off parasitoids of larvae, as observed elsewhere, but our findings show that positive ant–lycaenid interactions are conditional and depend on immature ontogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EFNs:

Extrafloral nectaries

DNO:

Dorsal nectary organ

References

  • Alves-Silva E, Bächtold A, Barônio GJ, Del-Claro K (2013a) Influence of Camponotus blandus (Formicinae) and flower buds on the occurrence of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Banisteriopsis malifolia (Malpighiaceae). Sociobiology 60:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves-Silva E, Barônio GJ, Torezan-Silingardi HM, Del-Claro K (2013b) Foraging behavior of Brachygastra lecheguana (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) on Banisteriopsis malifolia (Malpighiaceae): extrafloral nectar consumption and herbivore predation in a tending ant system. Entomol Sci 16:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1981) Ant-dependent food plant selection by the mistletoe butterfly Ogyris amaryllis (Lycaenidae). Oecologia 48:60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bächtold A, Alves-Silva E (2013) Behavioral strategy of a lycaenid (Lepidoptera) caterpillar against aggressive ants in a Brazilian savanna. Acta Ethol 16:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bächtold A, Alves-Silva E, Del-Claro K (2013) Lycaenidae larvae feeding on Peixotoa parviflora (Malpighiaceae) in a semi-deciduous forest in Southeastern Brazil. J Lepid Soc 67:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballmer GR, Pratt GF (1988) A survey of the last instar larvae of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) of California. J Res Lepidoptera 27:1–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballmer RG, Pratt GF (1991) Quantification of ant attendance (myrmecophily) of lycaenid larvae. J Res Lepid 30:95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH, Rashbrook VK, Beattie AJ (1994) Assessing benefits to both participants in a lycaenid–ant association. Ecology 75:1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels H, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2005) Nutrient composition of larval nectar secretions from three species of myrmecophilous butterflies. J Chem Ecol 31:2805–2821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K (2004) Multitrophic relationships, conditional mutualisms, and the study of interaction biodiversity in tropical savannas. Neotrop Entomol 33:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Berto V, Réu W (1996) Effect of herbivore deterrence by ants on the fruit set of an extrafloral nectary plant, Qualea multiflora (Vochysiaceae). J Trop Ecol 12:887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Marullo R, Mound LA (1997) A new Brazilian species of Heterothrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) co-existing with ants in the flowers of Peixotoa tomentosa (Malpighiaceae). J Nat Hist 31:1307–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devries PJ (1991) Mutualism between Thisbe irenea butterflies and ants, and the role of ant ecology in the evolution of larval-ant associations. Biol J Linn Soc 43:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte M, de Almeida GL, Casagrande MM, Mielke OHH (2001) Notes on the last instar larva and pupa of Hemiargus hanno (Stoll) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatinae). Rev Bras Zool 18:1097–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer LA (1997) Effectiveness of caterpillar defenses against three species of invertebrate predators. J Res Lepid 34:48–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (1991) Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Bonn Zool Monogr 31:1–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (2001) Ants that associate with Lycaeninae butterfly larvae: diversity, ecology and biogeography. Divers Distrib 7:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (2006) Ant-associates of Palaearctic lycaenid butterfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)—a review. Myrmecologische Nachr 9:77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Maschwitz U (1989) The symbiosis between the weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina, and Anthene emolus, an obligate myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. J Nat Hist 23:833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Seufert P, Pierce NE et al (1992) Exploitation of lycaenid-ant mutualisms by braconid parasitoids. J Res Lepid 31:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML, Gompert Z, Nice CC et al (2011) Ant association facilitates the evolution of diet breadth in a lycaenid butterfly. Proc Biol Sci 278:1539–1547

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AM, Tregenza T, Wedell N et al (2002) Oviposition tests of ant preference in a myrmecophilous butterfly. J Evol Biol 15:861–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibernau M, Dejean A (2001) Ant protection of a Heteropteran trophobiont against a parasitoid wasp. Oecologia 126:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath A, Claassens AJM (2003) Ant associations among southern African lycaenidae. J Lepid Soc 1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojo MK, Yamamoto A, Akino T et al (2014) Ants use partner specific odors to learn to recognize a mutualistic partner. PLoS One 9:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LA, Freitas AVL (2010) Natural history and morphology of immature stages of the butterfly Allosmaitia strophius (Godart) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on flower buds of Malpighiaceae. Stud Neotrop Fauna E 45:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LA, Rodrigues D (2011) Species-specific levels of ant attendance mediate performance costs in a facultative myrmecophilous butterfly. Physiol Entomol 36:208–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LA, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2010) Interaction between mutualisms: ant-tended butterflies exploit enemy-free space provided by ant-treehopper associations. Am Nat 176:322–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetta P, Bernstein C, Théry M et al (2008) Foraging and associative learning of visual signals in a parasitic wasp. Anim Cogn 11:525–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malicky H (1970) New aspects of the association between lycaenid larvae (Lycaenidae) and ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Lepid Soc 24:190–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro RF (1991) Cryptic larval polychromatism in Rekoa marius Lucas and R. palegon Cramer (Lycaenidae: Theclinae). J Res Lepid 29:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS (1997) The ecological function of extrafloral nectaries: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants and reproductive output in Caryocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae). Funct Ecol 11:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AM (1993) The nature of ant attendance and the survival of larval Icaricia armon (Lycaenidae). J Lepid Soc 47:8–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Easteal S (1986) The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly, Glaucopsyche lygdamus. J Anim Ecol 55:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Elgar MA (1985) The influence of ants on host plant selection by Jalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Mead PS (1981) Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly larvae and ants. Science 211:1185–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Kitching RL, Buckley RC et al (1987) The costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras, and its attendant ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A et al (2002) The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu Rev Entomol 47:733–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RK (1991) Cost and evolution of a facultative mutualism between ants and lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera). Oikos 62:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RK, Aiello A (1982) Foodplant and oviposition records for Panamanian Lycaenidae and Ridonidae. J Lepid Soc 36:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues D, Kaminski LA, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2010) Trade-offs underlying polyphagy in a facultative ant-tended florivorous butterfly: the role of host plant quality and enemy-free space. Oecologia 163:719–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar BA, Whitman DW (2001) Defensive tactics of caterpillars against predators and parasitoids. In: Ananthakrishnan TN (ed) Insects and plant defences dynamics. Science Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, pp 161–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt DJ, Rice SJ (2002) Association of ants with juvenile Ogyris amaryllis amaryllis Hewitson (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in south-eastern Queensland. Aust J Entomol 41:164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder R, Wurm L, Varama M et al (2008) Unusual mechanisms involved in learning of oviposition-induced host plant odours in an egg parasitoid? Anim Behav 75:1423–1430. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoble MJ (1995) The Lepidoptera. Form function and diversity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. Am Nat 174:134–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert P, Fiedler K (1996) The influence of ants on patterns of colonization and establishment within a set of coexisting lycaenid butterflies in a south-east Asian tropical rain forest. Oecologia 106:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert P, Fiedler K (1999) Myrmecophily and parasitoid infestation of South-East Asian lycaenid butterfly larvae. Ecotropica 5:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva NAP, Duarte M, Diniz IR, Morais HC (2011) Host plants of Lycaenidae on inflorescences in the central Brazilian cerrado. J Res Lepid 44:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva NAP, Duarte M, Araujo EB, Morais HC (2014) Larval biology of anthophagous Eumaeini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae, Theclinae) in the Cerrado of central Brazil

  • Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2008) Mutualism: ants and their insect partners. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trager MD, Thom MD, Daniels JC (2013) Ant-related oviposition and larval performance in a myrmecophilous lycaenid. Psyche (Stuttg) 2013:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D, Kurina L (1997) The influence of ants and water availability on oviposition behaviour and survivorship of a facultatively ant-tended herbivore. Ecol Entomol 22:352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks JA (2003) Parasitism and ant protection alter the survival of the lycaenid Hemiargus isola. Ecol Entomol 28:228–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of Clube de Caça e Pesca Itororó de Uberlândia, where the study was carried out; Renata Pacheco and Jonas Maravalhas for ant identification; Prof. Konrad Fiedler for early suggestions; Sebastián Sendoyia for the inestimable help in statistical analyses (GLMM); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes); Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp) for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kleber Del-Claro.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bächtold, A., Alves-Silva, E., Kaminski, L.A. et al. The role of tending ants in host plant selection and egg parasitism of two facultative myrmecophilous butterflies. Naturwissenschaften 101, 913–919 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1232-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1232-9

Keywords

Navigation