Abstract
Investigating how the environment affects age and size at maturity of individuals is crucial to understanding how changes in the environment affect population dynamics through the biology of a species. Paternal phenotype, maternal, and offspring environment may crucially influence these traits, but to my knowledge, their combined effects have not yet been tested. Here, I found that in bulb mites (Rhizoglyphus robini), maternal nutrition, offspring nutrition, and paternal phenotype (males are fighters, able to kill other mites, or benign scramblers) interactively affected offspring age and size at maturity. The largest effect occurred when both maternal and offspring nutrition was poor: in that case offspring from fighter sires required a significantly longer development time than offspring from scrambler sires. Investigating parental effects on the relationship between age and size at maturity revealed no paternal effects, and only for females was its shape influenced by maternal nutrition. Overall, this reaction norm was nonlinear. These non-genetic intergenerational effects may play a complex, yet unexplored role in influencing population fluctuations—possibly explaining why results from field studies often do not match theoretical predictions on maternal effects on population dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469
Banks PB, Powell F (2004) Does maternal condition or predation risk influence small mammal population dynamics? Oikos 106:176–184
Bashey F (2006) Cross-generational environmental effects and the evolution of offspring size in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Ecology 60:348–361
Beckerman A, Benton TG, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (2002) Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends Ecol Evol 17:263–269
Bedhomme S, Agnew P, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y (2003) Sex-specific reaction norms to intraspecific larval competition in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Evol Biol 16:721–730
Benton TG, Plaistow SJ, Beckerman AP, Lapsley CT, Littlejohns S (2005) Changes in maternal investment in eggs can affect population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1351–1356
Benton TG, St Clair JJH, Plaistow SJ (2008) Maternal effects mediated by maternal age: from life histories to population dynamics. J Anim Ecol 77:1038–1046
Bonduriansky R, Head M (2007) Maternal and paternal condition effects on offspring phenotype in Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae). J Evol Biol 20:2379–2388
Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445
Chippindale AK, Leroi AM, Saing H, Borash DJ, Rose MR (1997) Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction. J Evol Biol 10:269–293
Coulson T, Benton TG, Lundberg P, Dall SRX, Kendall BE (2006) Putting evolutionary biology back in the ecological theatre: demographic framework mapping genes to communities. Evol Ecol Res 8:1155–1171
Crill WD, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW (1996) Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on the morphology and physiology of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50:1205–1218
Cunningham EJ, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77
Day T, Rowe L (2002) Developmental thresholds and the evolution of reaction norms for age and size at life-history transitions. Am Nat 159:338–350
Donelson JM, Mudnay PL, McCormick MI (2009) Parental effects on offspring life histories: when are they important? Biol Lett 5:262–265
Ergon TX, Lambin X, Stenseth NC (2001) Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment. Nature 411:1043–1045
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow
Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 45:341–369
García-González F, Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. J Evol Biol 18:1097–1103
Gerson U, Capua S, Thorens D (1983) Life history and life tables of Rhizoglyphus robini Claparède (Acari: Astigmata: Acaridae). Acarologia 24: 439–448
Gerson U, Cohen E, Capua S (1991) Bulb mite, Rhizglyphus robini (Astigmata: Acaridae) as an experimental animal. Exp App Acarol 12: 103–110
Giesel JT (1986) Effects of parental photoperiod regime on progeny development time in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 40:649–651
Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128
Hales CN, Barker DJP (2001) The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull 60:5–20
Huestis DL, Marshall JL (2006) Interaction between maternal effects and temperature affects diapause occurrence in the cricket Allonemobius socius. Oecologia 146:513–520
Huey RB, Wakefield T, Crill WD, Gilchrist GW (1995) Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on early fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74:216–223
Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998) Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:447–451
Kolm N (2001) Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2229–2234
Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Hunt J, Tomkins JL (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat 161:852–859
Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Myers JH, Boettner G, Elkinton J (1998) Maternal effects in gypsy moth: only sex ratio varies with population density. Ecology 79:305–314
van Noordwijk AJ, De Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142
Plaistow SJ, Benton TG (2009) The influence of context-dependent maternal effects on population dynamics: an experimental test. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1049–1058
Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Beckerman AP, Benton TG (2004) Age and size at maturity: sex, environmental variability and developmental thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:919–924
Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Benton TG (2006) Context-dependent intergenerational effects: the interaction between past and present environments and its effect on population dynamics. Am Nat 167:206–215
Prasad NG, Shakarad M, Rajamani M, Joshi A (2003) Interaction between the effects of maternal and larval levels of nutrition on pre-adult survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Ecol Res 5:903–911
Priest NK, Roach DA, Galloway LF (2008) Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and seminal fluid. Biol Lett 4:6–8
Radwan J (1995) Male morph determination in 2 species of acarid mites. Heredity 74:669–673
Radwan J (2007) Sexual selection and conflict in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini (Astigmata: Acaridae). Exp Appl Acarol 42:151–158
Roberts ML, Peters A (2009) Is testosterone immunosuppressive in a condition-dependent manner? An experimental test in blue tits. J Exp Biol 212:1811–1818
Smallegange IM (2011) Complex environmental effects on the expression of alternative reproductive phenotypes in the bulb mite. Evol Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9446-6
Smallegange IM, Coulson T (2011) The stochastic demography of two coexisting male morphs. Ecology 92: 755–764
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stillwell RC, Blanckenhorn WU, Teder T, Davidowitz G, Fox CW (2010) Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu Rev Entomol 55:227–245
Wedell N (1996) Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am Nat 148:1075–1088
Weiner J, Martinez S, Müller-Schärer H, Stoll P, Schmid B (1997) How important are environmental maternal effects in plants? A study with Centaureamaculosa. J Ecol 85:133–142
Acknowledgments
I thank the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research for funding (Rubicon Fellowship), Tim Coulson and Mark Roberts for discussion and comments, and four anonymous referees for their comments. The experiments in this study comply with current laws in the UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smallegange, I.M. Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite. Naturwissenschaften 98, 339–346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0773-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0773-4