Skip to main content
Log in

Order parameters from image analysis: a honeycomb example

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Honeybee combs have aroused interest in the ability of honeybees to form regular hexagonal geometric constructs since ancient times. Here we use a real space technique based on the pair distribution function (PDF) and radial distribution function (RDF), and a reciprocal space method utilizing the Debye-Waller Factor (DWF) to quantify the order for a range of honeycombs made by Apis mellifera ligustica. The PDFs and RDFs are fit with a series of Gaussian curves. We characterize the order in the honeycomb using a real space order parameter, OP 3 , to describe the order in the combs and a two-dimensional Fourier transform from which a Debye-Waller order parameter, u, is derived. Both OP 3 and u take values from [0, 1] where the value one represents perfect order. The analyzed combs have values of OP 3 from 0.33 to 0.60 and values of u from 0.59 to 0.69. RDF fits of honeycomb histograms show that naturally made comb can be crystalline in a 2D ordered structural sense, yet is more ‘liquid-like’ than cells made on ‘foundation’ wax. We show that with the assistance of man-made foundation wax, honeybees can manufacture highly ordered arrays of hexagonal cells. This is the first description of honeycomb utilizing the Debye-Waller Factor, and provides a complete analysis of the order in comb from a real-space order parameter and a reciprocal space order parameter. It is noted that the techniques used are general in nature and could be applied to any digital photograph of an ordered array.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett S (2008) The web site of Image SXM. Accessed April 2008. http://www.liv.ac.uk/~sdb/ImageSXM/.

  • Belic MR, Skarka V, Deneubourg JL, Lax M (1986) Mathematical model of honeycomb construction. J Math Biol 24:437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DJ, Ishay JS (2007) Do bees and hornets use acoustic resonance in order to monitor and coordinate comb construction? Bull Math Biol 69(5):1777–1790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Betts AD (1921) The structure of comb-I & II. Bee World 3:37–38. 73–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron FW, Fuller RW (1970) Mathematics of classical and quantum physics. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S, Sneyd J, Jenkins MJ, Murray J (1990) A mathematical model of self-organized pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies. J Theor Biol 147:553–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaikin PM, Lubensky TC (1995) Principles of condensed matter physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggshall WL, Morse RA (1984) Beeswax. Wicwas, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane E (2004) A short history of knowledge about honey bees (Apis) up to 1800. Bee World 85:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlet PM, Van Petegem S, Van Swygenhoven H (2005) Phys Rev B 71:024114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egami T, Billinge SJL (2003) Underneath the Bragg peaks: structural analysis of complex materials. Pergamon, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frigo M, Johnson SG (2005) Proc IEEE 93:216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales TC (2001) The honeycomb conjecture. Discrete Comput Geom 25:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn HR, Whiffler LA (1991) Construction defects define pattern and method in comb building by honeybees. Apidologie 22:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaatz FH (2006) Measuring the order in ordered porous arrays: can bees outperform humans? Naturwissenschaften 93:374–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel C (1976) Introduction to solid state physics, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama K, Iikubo S, Taguchi T, Shamoto S (2006) Finite size effects of nanoparticles on the atomic pair distribution functions. Acta Cryst A62:444–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason G (1968) Radial distribution functions from small packings of spheres. Nature (London) 217:733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirk CWW, Hepburn HR, Radloff SE, Tautz J (2004) Honeybee combs: construction through a liquid equilibrium process? Naturwissenschaften 91:350–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reis PM, Ingale RA, Shattuck MD (2006) Crystallization of a quasi-two-dimensional granular fluid. Phys Rev Lett 96:258001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toth LF (1964) What the bees know and what they do not know. Bull Am Math Soc 70:468–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1974) Animal architecture. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The honeycomb used in this study was purchased from Sawyer’s Apiaries, Swanton, OH, 43558, USA. F. H. Kaatz thanks Sarah Long for useful discussions. We thank the anonymous referees for comments that improved the quality of the paper. The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Forrest H. Kaatz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaatz, F.H., Bultheel, A. & Egami, T. Order parameters from image analysis: a honeycomb example. Naturwissenschaften 95, 1033–1040 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0418-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0418-4

Keywords

Navigation