Abstract
Social insect colonies are not the harmonious entities they were once considered. Considerable conflicts exist between colony members, as has been shown for Hymenoptera. For termites, similar studies are lacking, but aggressive manipulations have been claimed to regulate sexual development, and even to account for the evolution of workers. This study on a basal termite, Cryptotermes secundus (Kalotermitidae), suggests that the importance of aggressive manipulations in termites has been overemphasized. Wing-bud mutilations, a means proposed to regulate the development of dispersing sexuals (alates), seem to be artifacts of handling conditions that cause disturbance. Aggressive behaviors never occurred unless colonies were disturbed. Theoretical considerations further showed that the potential for intense conflict among termite nestmates is low compared to hymenopteran societies. Strong conflicts are only expected to occur over the replacement of natal reproductives that died, while less intense conflicts should exist over the development into alates when food in the colony becomes limiting. Accordingly, intracolonial aggressive interactions over replacement are common, whereas nestmates seem to manipulate alate development via proctodeal feeding when food resources decline. However, the latter is rather an honest signal than a manipulation because only the most competent prospective dispersers can impede the development of nestmates.
References
Abe T (1987) Evolution of life types in termites. In: Kawano S, Connell JH, Hidaka T (eds) Evolution and coadaptation in biotic communities. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 125–148
Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 3:383–407
Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cuvillier-Hot V, Gadagkar R, Peeters C, Cobb M (2002) Regulation of reproduction in a queenless ant: aggression, pheromones and reduction in conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1295–1300
Kardile SP, Gadagkar R (2002) Docile sitters and active fighters in paper wasps: a tale of two queens. Naturwissenschaften 89:176–179
Keller L, Nonacs P (1993) The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Anim Behav 45:787–794
Korb J, Katrantzis S (2004) Influence of environmental conditions on the expression of the sexual dispersal phenotype in a lower termite: implications for the evolution of workers in termites. Evol Dev 6:342–352
Korb J, Lenz M (2004) Reproductive decision-making in the termite Cryptotermes secundus (Kalotermitidae) under variable food conditions. Behav Ecol 14:390–395
Korb J, Schmidinger S (2004) Help or disperse? Cooperation in termites influenced by food conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:89–95
Lenz M, Barrett RA, Williams ER (1985) Reproductive strategies in Cryptotermes: neotenic production in indigenous and “tramp” species in Australia (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). In: Watson JAL, Okot-Kotber BM, Noirot C (eds) Caste differentiation in social insects. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 147–163
Lüscher M (1955) Zur Frage der Übertragung sozialer Wirkstoffe bei Termiten. Naturwissenschaften 7:186–187
Myles TG (1986) Evidence of parental and-or sibling manipulation in three species of termites in Hawaii USA Isoptera. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 27:129–140
Roisin Y (1994) Intragroup conflicts and the evolution of sterile castes in termites. Am Nat 143:751–765
Sewell JJ, Watson JAL (1981) Developmental pathways in Australian species of Kalotermes Hagen (Isoptera). Sociobiology 6:243–323
Springhetti A (1969) Il controllo sociale della differenziazione degli alati in Kalotermes flavicollis Fabr. (Isoptera). Ann Univ Ferrara Sez III 3:73–96
Stuart A (1979) The determination and regulation of the neotenic reproductive caste in the lower termites (Isoptera): with special reference to the genus Zootermopsis (Hagen). Sociobiology 4:223–237
Thorne BL (1997) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:27–54
Thorne BL, Traniello JFA (2003) Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. Annu Rev Entomol 48:283–306
Zimmerman RB (1983) Sibling manipulation and indirect fitness in termites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:143–145
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank K. Schneider and A. Poppek for behavioral observations, A. Bourke, A. Hartmann, P. Nonacs, Y. Roisin and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on the manuscript, and M. Lenz for support in Australia. The project was supported by the German Science Foundation (KO 1895/2-1). Environment Australia gave permission to export the termites (no. PWS P20011508). The experiments performed comply with the current laws in Australia and Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korb, J. Regulation of sexual development in the basal termite Cryptotermes secundus: mutilation, pheromonal manipulation or honest signal?. Naturwissenschaften 92, 45–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0589-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0589-6