Skip to main content
Log in

Regulation of sexual development in the basal termite Cryptotermes secundus: mutilation, pheromonal manipulation or honest signal?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social insect colonies are not the harmonious entities they were once considered. Considerable conflicts exist between colony members, as has been shown for Hymenoptera. For termites, similar studies are lacking, but aggressive manipulations have been claimed to regulate sexual development, and even to account for the evolution of workers. This study on a basal termite, Cryptotermes secundus (Kalotermitidae), suggests that the importance of aggressive manipulations in termites has been overemphasized. Wing-bud mutilations, a means proposed to regulate the development of dispersing sexuals (alates), seem to be artifacts of handling conditions that cause disturbance. Aggressive behaviors never occurred unless colonies were disturbed. Theoretical considerations further showed that the potential for intense conflict among termite nestmates is low compared to hymenopteran societies. Strong conflicts are only expected to occur over the replacement of natal reproductives that died, while less intense conflicts should exist over the development into alates when food in the colony becomes limiting. Accordingly, intracolonial aggressive interactions over replacement are common, whereas nestmates seem to manipulate alate development via proctodeal feeding when food resources decline. However, the latter is rather an honest signal than a manipulation because only the most competent prospective dispersers can impede the development of nestmates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abe T (1987) Evolution of life types in termites. In: Kawano S, Connell JH, Hidaka T (eds) Evolution and coadaptation in biotic communities. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 125–148

  • Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 3:383–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Cuvillier-Hot V, Gadagkar R, Peeters C, Cobb M (2002) Regulation of reproduction in a queenless ant: aggression, pheromones and reduction in conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kardile SP, Gadagkar R (2002) Docile sitters and active fighters in paper wasps: a tale of two queens. Naturwissenschaften 89:176–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Nonacs P (1993) The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Anim Behav 45:787–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korb J, Katrantzis S (2004) Influence of environmental conditions on the expression of the sexual dispersal phenotype in a lower termite: implications for the evolution of workers in termites. Evol Dev 6:342–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korb J, Lenz M (2004) Reproductive decision-making in the termite Cryptotermes secundus (Kalotermitidae) under variable food conditions. Behav Ecol 14:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korb J, Schmidinger S (2004) Help or disperse? Cooperation in termites influenced by food conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz M, Barrett RA, Williams ER (1985) Reproductive strategies in Cryptotermes: neotenic production in indigenous and “tramp” species in Australia (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). In: Watson JAL, Okot-Kotber BM, Noirot C (eds) Caste differentiation in social insects. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 147–163

  • Lüscher M (1955) Zur Frage der Übertragung sozialer Wirkstoffe bei Termiten. Naturwissenschaften 7:186–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles TG (1986) Evidence of parental and-or sibling manipulation in three species of termites in Hawaii USA Isoptera. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 27:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Roisin Y (1994) Intragroup conflicts and the evolution of sterile castes in termites. Am Nat 143:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell JJ, Watson JAL (1981) Developmental pathways in Australian species of Kalotermes Hagen (Isoptera). Sociobiology 6:243–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Springhetti A (1969) Il controllo sociale della differenziazione degli alati in Kalotermes flavicollis Fabr. (Isoptera). Ann Univ Ferrara Sez III 3:73–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart A (1979) The determination and regulation of the neotenic reproductive caste in the lower termites (Isoptera): with special reference to the genus Zootermopsis (Hagen). Sociobiology 4:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne BL (1997) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne BL, Traniello JFA (2003) Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. Annu Rev Entomol 48:283–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RB (1983) Sibling manipulation and indirect fitness in termites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank K. Schneider and A. Poppek for behavioral observations, A. Bourke, A. Hartmann, P. Nonacs, Y. Roisin and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on the manuscript, and M. Lenz for support in Australia. The project was supported by the German Science Foundation (KO 1895/2-1). Environment Australia gave permission to export the termites (no. PWS P20011508). The experiments performed comply with the current laws in Australia and Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Korb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korb, J. Regulation of sexual development in the basal termite Cryptotermes secundus: mutilation, pheromonal manipulation or honest signal?. Naturwissenschaften 92, 45–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0589-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0589-6

Keywords

Navigation