Skip to main content
Log in

Pheromone-modulated behavioral suites influence colony growth in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of a species depends on its ability to assess its environment and to decide accordingly which behaviors are most appropriate. Many animal species, from bacteria to mammals, are able to communicate using interspecies chemicals called pheromones. In addition to exerting physiological effects on individuals, for social species, pheromones communicate group social structure. Communication of social structure is important to social insects for the allocation of its working members into coordinated suites of behaviors. We tested effects of long-term treatment with brood pheromone on suites of honey bee brood rearing and foraging behaviors. Pheromone-treated colonies reared significantly greater brood areas and more adults than controls, while amounts of stored pollen and honey remained statistically similar. Brood pheromone increased the number of pollen foragers and the pollen load weights they returned. It appeared that the pheromone-induced increase in pollen intake was directly canalized into more brood rearing. A two-way pheromone priming effect was observed, such that some workers from the same age cohorts showed an increased and extended capacity to rear larvae, while others were recruited at significantly younger ages into pollen-specific foraging. Brood pheromone affected suites of nursing and foraging behaviors allocating worker and pollen resources associated with an important fitness trait, colony growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Allen MD (1960) The honeybee queen and her attendants. Anim Behav 8:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono M de, Bergmann CI (1998) Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homology modifies social behavior and feeding response in C. elegans. Cell 94:679–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvin R (1956) Les facteurs qui gouverment la ponte chez la reine des abeilles. Insectes Soc 3:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CD, Winston ML, Ydenberg RC (1994) The relationship between population size, amount of brood, and individual foraging behaviour in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Oecologia 97:248–255

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH, Winston ML (1992) Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeConte Y, Mohammedi A, Robinson GE (2001) Primer effects of a brood pheromone on honeybee behavioural development. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammedi A, Crauser D, Paris A, Le Conte Y (1996) Effect of a brood pheromone on honeybee hypopharyngeal glands. C R Acad Sci Paris 319:769–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Erber J (2002) Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften 89:91–106

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T (2003) Directional change in a suite of foraging behaviors in tropical and temperate evolved honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T (2004) Brood pheromone regulates foraging activity of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Econ Entomol 97:748–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Page RE (2001) Brood pheromone modulates sucrose response thresholds in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Rubink WL (2002) Pollen foraging response to brood pheromone by Africanized and European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Ann Entomol Soc Am 95:761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Page RE, Fondrk MK (1998) Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2000) The SAS system, version 8.01. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Winston ML, Ydenberg RC (1993) Foraging of individual workers in relation to colony state in the social hymenoptera. Can Entomol 125:129–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski MB (1998) Genes for normal behavioral variation: recent clues from flies and worms. Neuron 21:463–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Winston ML, Higo HA, Colley SJ, Pankiw T (1991) The role of queen mandibular pheromone and colony congestion in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) reproductive swarming. J Insect Behav 4:649–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the USDA and Texas Legislative Honey Bee Initiative to T. Pankiw.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya Pankiw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pankiw, T., Roman, R., Sagili, R.R. et al. Pheromone-modulated behavioral suites influence colony growth in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften 91, 575–578 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0568-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0568-y

Keywords

Navigation