Skip to main content
Log in

Is dauer pheromone of Caenorhabditis elegans really a pheromone?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals respond to signals and cues in their environment. The difference between a signal (e.g. a pheromone) and a cue (e.g. a waste product) is that the information content of a signal is subject to natural selection, whereas that of a cue is not. The model free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans forms an alternative developmental morph (the dauer larva) in response to a so-called ‘dauer pheromone’, produced by all worms. We suggest that the production of ‘dauer pheromone’ has no fitness advantage for an individual worm and therefore we propose that ‘dauer pheromone’ is not a signal, but a cue. Thus, it should not be called a pheromone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Golden JW, Riddle DL (1984a) The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev Biol 102:368–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golden JW, Riddle DL (1984b) A pheromone-induced developmental switch in Caenorhabditis elegans: temperature-sensitive mutants reveal a wild-type temperature-dependent process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:819–823

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson PA, Irving PW, Magurran AE (1997) Fish pheromones and evolutionary enigmas: a reply to Smith. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:451–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Karlson P, Lüscher M (1959) ‘Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183:55–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon C (1997) Environmental factors and gene activities that influence life span. In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, (eds) C. elegans II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp 791–813

  • Klass M, Hirsh D (1976) Non-ageing developmental variant of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 260:523–535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JE (1983) Bioluminescence and communication in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:131–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1996) Is there a fish alarm pheromone? A wild study and critique. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1551–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1983) Kin selection and conflict in seed maturation. J Theor Biol 100:153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle DL, Albert PS (1997) Genetic and environmental regulation of dauer larva development. In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, (eds) C. elegans II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp 739–790

  • Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition Systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds). Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJF (1997) Does one result trump all others? A response to Magurran, Irving and Henderson. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Viney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viney, M.E., Franks, N.R. Is dauer pheromone of Caenorhabditis elegans really a pheromone?. Naturwissenschaften 91, 123–124 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0503-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0503-2

Keywords

Navigation