Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Auditory Steady-State Response

An der Schwelle zur klinischen Nutzung?

  • Im Fokus
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernecke KD (2001) Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology 40:245–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cone-Wesson B, Dowell RC, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming WJ (2002) The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:173–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cone-Wesson B, Parker J, Swiderski N, Rickards F (2002) The auditory steady-state response: full-term and premature neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 13:260–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cone-Wesson B, Rickards F, Poulis C, Parker J, Tan L, Pollard J (2002) The auditory steady-state response: clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol 13:270–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, van Roon P, Picton TW (2001) Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear 22:100–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, van Roon P et al. (2002) Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 13:205–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Picton TW (2004) Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 25:68–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobie RA, Wilson DF (1996) A comparison of t-test, F-test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236–2246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ (1981) A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2643–2647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2003) Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 42:237–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herdman AT, Picton TW, Stapells DR (2002) Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1569–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoke M, Hoke ES (1997) Wandel in Diagnostik und Therapie: auditorische reiz- und ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale und Magnetfelder in der audiologischen Diagnostik. In: Koch U, Theissing J (Hrsg) Verhandlungsbericht 1997 der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 175–217

  13. John MS, Picton TW (2000) MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 61:125–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. John MS, Lins OG, Boucher BL, Picton TW (1998) Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 37:59–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. John MS, Purcell D, Dimitrijevic A, Picton TW (2002) Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 13:246–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Picton TW (2002) Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 23:106–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Picton TW (2003) Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 24:406–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. John MS, Brown DK, Muir PJ, Picton TW (2004) Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear (in press)

  19. Lins OG, Picton TW (1985) Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:420–432

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL et al. (1996) Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 17:81–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J (2004) Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol (in press)

  22. Lux L, Pethe J, Mühler R, von Specht H (2003) Bestimmung der Hörschwelle durch die Registrierung von Amplitude Modulation Following Responses (AMFR) bei multifrequenter Stimulation. Z Audiol 42:118–124

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodriguez E, Galan L (2001) Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal hearing subjects. Ear Hear 22:200–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pethe J, Hocke T, Mühler R, von Specht H (2000) On the frequency spectrum of amplitude modulation following responses. Scand Audiol 29:191–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pethe J, Mühler R, von Specht H (2001) Zur Abhängigkeit der Amplitude Modulation Following Response von der Vigilanz. HNO 49:188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pethe J, Mühler R, von Specht H (2002) Amplitude Modulation Following Responses (AMFR) in der audiologischen Diagnostik. HNO 50:1045–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pethe J, Mühler R, Siewert K, von Specht H (2004) Near-threshold recordings of amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR) in children of different ages. Int J Audiol (in press)

  28. Picton TW, Skinner CR, Champagne SC, Kellet AJ, Maiste A (1987) Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 82:165–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, van Roon P, John MS, Reed M, Finkelstein H (2002) Possible roles for the auditory steady-state responses in fitting hearing aids. In: Seewald RC, Gravel JS (eds) A sound foundation through early amplification 2001. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference. Phonak AG, Basel, S 63–73

  30. Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, John MS (2002) Multiple auditory steady-state responses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 189:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  31. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rance G, Briggs RJ (2002) Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 189:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rance G, Rickards FW (2002) Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 13:236–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rance G, Dowell RC, Rickards FW, Beer DE, Clark GM (1998) Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear 19:48–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rickards FW, Clark GM (1984) Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. In: Nodar RH, Barber C (eds) Evoked potentials II. Butterworth, Boston, pp 163–168

  36. Sininger Y (2003) Audiologic assessment in infants. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 11:378–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Pschirrer U (2001) Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology 40:63–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Neumann K (2003) Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol 42:59–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Swanepoel D, Schmulian D, Hugo R (2004) Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem protocol. Acta Otolaryngol 124:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Valdes JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Martin V, Savio G, Sierra C, Rodriguez E, Lins OG (1997) Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear 18:420–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Experimentelle Audiologie und Medizinische Physik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

    R. Mühler

  2. Abteilung für Experimentelle Audiologie und Medizinische Physik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120, Magdeburg

    R. Mühler

Authors
  1. R. Mühler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Mühler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mühler, R. Auditory Steady-State Response. HNO 52, 779–782 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-004-1140-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-004-1140-y

Search

Navigation