Skip to main content
Log in

Praktische Aspekte der molekularen Diagnostik bei Genodermatosen

Practical aspects of molecular diagnostics in genodermatoses

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Genodermatosen sind seltene genetische Erkrankungen mit einem breiten Spektrum an kutanen und extrakutanen Manifestationen und molekulargenetischem Hintergrund. Bei Verdacht auf eine Genodermatose bleiben die klinische Bewertung durch erfahrene Spezialisten und eine sinnvolle Staffelung der Untersuchungen auch in der Ära der „Next Generation Sequencing“ (NGS) unabdingbar. Der Diagnostikpfad zur molekularen Abklärung der Diagnose ist von der klinischen und genetischen Heterogenität der Krankheitsgruppe abhängig. Die Anwendung der NGS-basierten Tests führt zu einer wesentlich kürzeren Zeit der Diagnose der Genodermatosen und der Identifizierung neuer Erkrankungen und krankheitsassoziierter Gene. Die neu gewonnenen Erkenntnisse zu Genotyp-Phänotyp-Korrelationen sollten die Grundlage für eine zeitgemäße molekulargenetische Revision der Klassifikation der Genodermatosen bilden.

Abstract

Genodermatoses are rare genetic disorders with a broad spectrum of cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations that have a genetic background. A thorough clinical examination, laboratory workup and morphological analyses of the skin remain crucial for the diagnosis in the era of next generation sequencing (NGS). The diagnostic algorithm depends on the clinical and molecular heterogeneity and should be adapted for each group of genodermatoses. In cases with uncharacteristic phenotypes which cannot be classified, NGS-based testing accelerates the time to diagnosis and leads to the identification of new disorders and new disease-associated genes. The new knowledge on genotype–phenotype correlations should enable revision of the classification of genodermatoses on a molecular basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Leech SN, Moss C (2007) A current and online genodermatosis database. Br J Dermatol 156(6):1115–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feramisco JD, Sadreyev RI, Murray ML, Grishin NV, Tsao H (2009) Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of genetic skin disease through the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. J Invest Dermatol 129(11):2628–2636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemke JR, Kernland-Lang K, Hörtnagel K, Itin P (2014) Monogenic human skin disorders. Dermatology 229(2):55–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Has C, Giehl K (2014) [Rare diseases are common]. Hautarzt 65(6):488–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Has C, Bruckner-Tuderman L (2014) The genetics of skin fragility. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 15:245–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laimer M, Bauer JW, Lang R (2015) [Molecular diagnostics in genodermatoses]. Hautarzt 66(3):203–211. (quiz 212–3)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pohla-Gubo G, Cepeda-Valdes R, Hintner H (2010) Immunofluorescence mapping for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol Clin 28(2):201–210, vii

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Has C, Kiritsi D (2014) [The many facets of inherited skin fragility]. Hautarzt 65(6):490–498

  9. Lehmann J, Schubert S, Emmert S (2014) Xeroderma pigmentosum: diagnostic procedures, interdisciplinary patient care, and novel therapeutic approaches. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges J Ger Soc Dermatol 12(10):867–872

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann J, Schubert S, Schäfer A, Laspe P, Haenssle HA, Ohlenbusch A et al (2014) A novel mutation in the XPA gene results in two truncated protein variants and leads to a severe XP/neurological symptoms phenotype. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi:10.1111/jdv.12841

  11. Poblete-Gutiérrez P, Wiederholt T, Merk HF, Frank J (2006) [Laboratory tests and therapeutic strategies for the porphyrias]. Hautarzt 57(6):493–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poblete-Gutiérrez P, Wiederholt T, Merk HF, Frank J (2006) The porphyrias: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Dermatol 16(3):230–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Traupe H, Fischer J, Oji V (2014) Nonsyndromic types of ichthyoses – an update. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 12(2):109–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raghunath M, Hennies HC, Velten F, Wiebe V, Steinert PM, Reis A et al (1998) A novel in situ method for the detection of deficient transglutaminase activity in the skin. Arch Dermatol Res 290(11):621–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oji V, Tadini G, Akiyama M, Blanchet Bardon C, Bodemer C, Bourrat E et al (2010) Revised nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses: results of the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sorèze 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(4):607–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer J (2009) Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis. J Invest Dermatol 129(6):1319–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Israeli S, Goldberg I, Fuchs-Telem D, Bergman R, Indelman M, Bitterman-Deutsch O et al (2013) Non-syndromic autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis in the Israeli population. Clin Exp Dermatol 38(8):911–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tenedini E, Artuso L, Bernardis I, Artusi V, Percesepe A, De Rosa L et al (2015) Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing: an effective approach for the molecular diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa. Br J Dermatol 173(3):731–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott CA, Plagnol V, Nitoiu D, Bland PJ, Blaydon DC, Chronnell CM et al (2013) Targeted sequence capture and high-throughput sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of ichthyosis and other skin diseases. J Invest Dermatol 133(2):573–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Has C, Kiritsi D, Mellerio JE, Franzke C-W, Wedgeworth E, Tantcheva-Poor I et al (2014) The missense mutation p.R1303Q in type XVII collagen underlies junctional epidermolysis bullosa resembling Kindler syndrome. J Invest Dermatol 134(3):845–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salam A, Simpson MA, Stone KL, Takeichi T, Nanda A, Akiyama M et al (2014) Next generation diagnostics of heritable connective tissue disorders. Matrix Biol J Int Soc Matrix Biol 33:35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Takeichi T, Liu L, Fong K, Ozoemena L, McMillan JR, Salam A et al (2015) Whole-exome sequencing improves mutation detection in a diagnostic epidermolysis bullosa laboratory. Br J Dermatol 172(1):94–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiritsi D, Valari M, Fortugno P, Hausser I, Lykopoulou L, Zambruno G et al (2015) Whole-exome sequencing in patients with ichthyosis reveals modifiers associated with increased IgE levels and allergic sensitizations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135(1):280–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell P, Morton PE, Takeichi T, Salam A, Roberts N, Proudfoot LE et al (2014) Epithelial inflammation resulting from an inherited loss-of-function mutation in EGFR. J Invest Dermatol 134(10):2570–2578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeichi T, Nanda A, Aristodemou S, McMillan JR, Lee J, Akiyama M et al (2015) Whole-exome sequencing diagnosis of two autosomal recessive disorders in one family. Br J Dermatol 172(5):1407–1411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pohler E, Cunningham F, Sandilands A, Cole C, Digby S, McMillan JR et al (2015) Novel autosomal dominant mutation in loricrin presenting as prominent ichthyosis. Br J Dermatol. doi:10.1111/bjd.13895

  27. Giehl KA, Eckstein GN, Pasternack SM, Praetzel-Wunder S, Ruzicka T, Lichtner P et al (2012) Nonsense mutations in AAGAB cause punctate palmoplantar keratoderma type Buschke-Fischer-Brauer. Am J Hum Genet 91(4):754–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Blaydon DC, Lind LK, Plagnol V, Linton KJ, Smith FJD, Wilson NJ et al (2013) Mutations in AQP5, encoding a water-channel protein, cause autosomal-dominant diffuse nonepidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Am J Hum Genet 93(2):330–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Samuelov L, Sarig O, Harmon RM, Rapaport D, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Isakov O et al (2013) Desmoglein 1 deficiency results in severe dermatitis, multiple allergies and metabolic wasting. Nat Genet 45(10):1244–1248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McAleer MA, Pohler E, Smith FJD, Wilson NJ, Cole C, MacGowan S et al (2015) Severe dermatitis, multiple allergies, and metabolic wasting syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the N-terminal plakin domain of desmoplakin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.002

  31. Happle R (2014) [How frequently does genetic mosaicism occur in the skin?]. Hautarzt 65(6):536–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Has C (2011) Mosaicism in the skin: the importance of mild or minimal skin lesions. Arch Dermatol 147(9):1094–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoffman K, Hertl M, Sitaru C (2015) Molekulare Diagnostik der blasenbildenden Autoimmundermatosen. Hautarzt. doi:10.1007/s105-015-3723-9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Has.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Has und Y. He geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Has, C., He, Y. Praktische Aspekte der molekularen Diagnostik bei Genodermatosen. Hautarzt 67, 53–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-015-3721-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-015-3721-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation