Skip to main content
Log in

Radiologische Diagnostik der intraduktalen papillär muzinösen Neoplasie

Radiological evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die intraduktale papillär muzinöse Neoplasie (IPMN) ist die häufigste zystische Neoplasie des Pankreas, die wegen der zunehmenden Verbreitung hochauflösender Schnittbildverfahren meist zufällig entdeckt wird. Den überwiegenden Anteil machen die Seitenastformen aus, die relativ häufig multifokal imponieren. Das klinische Bild kann einer chronischen Pankreatitis ähneln und auch das morphologische Bild kann eine chronische Pankreatitis vortäuschen. Zunehmend werden auch Schübe einer akuten Pankreatitis gesehen, die zumeist einen milden Verlauf nehmen. Das häufigste diagnostische Verfahren ist die kontrastverstärkte Computertomographie (CT), die in der Regel eine Differenzierung von anderen zystischen Pankreasneoplasien erlaubt und die Zuordnung zu einer Haupt- oder Seitenast-IPMN ermöglicht. Für die Darstellung der Feinarchitektur sind Magnetresonanz(MR)-Tomographie einschließlich MR-Cholangiopankreatographie und die Endosonographie der CT überlegen. Insbesondere zur Frage der malignen Entartung ist eine hochauflösende Bildgebung erforderlich. Während die Hauptgang-IPMN eine Indikation zur Resektion darstellt, wird bei kleinen und asymptomatischen Seitenast-IPMN eine Verlaufskontrolle in 6- bis 12-monatlichen Abständen empfohlen.

Abstract

The intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the most frequent cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. Due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging IPMN is being incidentally recognized with increasing frequency. The most common type is branch- duct IPMN which occurs multifocally in about 20–30%. Patients with IPMN may present with symptoms resembling chronic pancreatitis and episodes of acute pancreatitis are increasingly being reported which usually have a mild course. The most important diagnostic technique is contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), which most frequently allows the differentiation from other cystic lesions and enables the attribution to branch duct or main duct IPMN. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound are superior in depicting the fine architecture of cystic tumors. Particularly for evaluation of malignant transformation and extent of malignant disease, high resolution imaging is essential. Whereas main duct IPMN is an indication for resection therapy for small and asymptomatic branch duct IPMN periodic surveillance at 6–12 month intervals is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Adler G, Seufferlein T, Bischoff SC (2007) S3-Leitlinie „Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom“. Ergebnis einer evidenzbasierten Konsensuskonferenz. Z Gastroenterol 45:487–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adsay NV, Fukushima N, Furukawa T (2010) Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas; In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (Hrsg) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC, Lyon, S 304–313

  3. Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D (2004) Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 351:1218–1226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 138:427–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Girometti R, Intini S, Brondani G (2010) Incidental pancreatic cysts on 3D turbo spin echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: prevalence and relation with clinical and imaging features. Abdom Imaging 36:196–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikeda M, Sato T, Morozumi A (1994) Morphologic changes in the pancreas detected by screening ultrasonography in a mass survey, with special reference to main duct dilatation, cyst formation, and calcification. Pancreas 9:508–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivan K, Mortele KJ, Prevedello LM, Khorasani R (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists’ management recommendations. Radiology 259:136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamitani T, Nishimiya M, Takahashi N (2005) Xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis associated with intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. AJR 185:704–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Horton KM (2006) MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR 186:687–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khalid A, Brugge W (2007) ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol 102:2339–2349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YC, Choi JY, Chung YE (2010) Comparison of MRI and endoscopic ultrasound in the characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions. AJR 195:947–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klimstra DS, Pitman MB, Hruban RH (2009) An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:454–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubo H, Chijiiwa Y, Akahoshi K (2001) Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1429–1434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP (2008) Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 191:802–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC (2005) EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Macari M, Finn ME, Bennett GL (2009) Differentiating pancreatic cystic neoplasms from pancreatic pseudocysts at MR imaging: value of perceived internal debris. Radiology 251:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelletier AL, Hammel P, Rebours V (2010) Acute pancreatitis in patients operated on for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Frequency, severity, and clinicopathologic correlations. Pancreas 39:658–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL (2004) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experience. Ann Surg 239:788–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlitter AM, Esposito I, Klöppel G (2011) Klassifikation und Diagnose zystischer Pankreastumoren. Viszeralmedizin 27:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V (2006) International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 6:17–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanno S, Nakano Y, Koizumi K (2010) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in long-term follow-up patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Pancreas 39:36–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang XM, Mitchell DG, Dohke M (2002) Pancreatic cysts: depiction on single-shot fast spin-echo MR images. Radiology 223: 547–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H.J. Brambs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brambs, H., Juchems, M. Radiologische Diagnostik der intraduktalen papillär muzinösen Neoplasie. Chirurg 83, 116–122 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2182-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2182-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation