Zusammenfassung
Die Peritonektomie (PE) kombiniert mit hyperthermer intraperitonealer Chemotherapie (HIPEC) etabliert sich zunehmend als potenziell kurative Therapieoption bei Patienten mit peritoneal metastasierten gastrointestinalen und gynäkologischen Tumoren sowie primär peritonealen Malignomen. Entscheidend für die Prognose ist die möglichst komplette Zytoreduktion, die bei den allermeisten Fällen neben der partiellen bis subtotalen parietalen PE auch eine Multiorganresektionen erforderlich macht. Im Vordergrund steht dabei, für den Patienten eine adäquate Lebensqualität bei maximaler Tumorresektion zu erhalten. Die Morbidität nach PE und HIPEC liegt in erfahrenen Zentren zwischen 25 und 35% bei einem Mortalitätsrisiko von <5%. Zu beachten sind nicht nur chirurgisch technische Aspekte und die intraoperative Entscheidungsfindung, sondern auch das intraoperative anästhesiologische Management, die Intensivtherapie, die Schmerztherapie, das Komplikationsmanagement, die Physiotherapie und anderes mehr. Die wohl größte Herausforderung im Management der Peritonealkarzinose bleibt die Patientenselektion. Der Schnittbildgebung in Verbindung mit der FDG-PET fällt hierbei eine wichtige Rolle zur Abschätzung der Operabilität zu.
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now an established therapy with a curative option for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological peritoneal carcinomatosis as well as for primary peritoneal carcinomatous tumors. Decisive for the prognosis is a complete cytoreduction, which in most cases necessitates multi-organ resection in addition to a partial or subtotal parietal peritonectomy (PE). The highest priority is given to maintain an adequate quality of life for the patient while performing maximum tumor resection. The morbidity following PE and HIPEC in experienced centers lies between 25% and 35% with a mortality risk of <5%. Consideration must be given not only to the technical surgical aspects and the intraoperative decision-making but also to the intraoperative management, intensive care therapy, pain therapy, management of complications, physiotherapy and many more. The greatest challenge in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis is still patient selection. Computed tomography imaging together with 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) plays an important role in the assessment of operability.
Literatur
Al-Shammaa HA, Li Y, Yonemura Y (2008) Current status and future strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Gastroenterol 14:1159–1166
Esquivel J, Sticca R, Sugarbaker P et al (2007) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: a consensus statement. Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):128–133
González-Moreno S, Ortega-Pérez G, González-Bayón L (2009) Indications and patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 100:287–292
Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER (2005) FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97:183–191
Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE et al (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189
Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82:359–374
Pelz JO, Stojadinovic A, Nissan A et al (2009) Evaluation of a peritoneal surface disease severity score in patients with colon cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Surg Oncol 99(1):9–15
Pfannenberg C, Königsrainer I, Aschoff P et al (2009) (18)F-FDG-PET/CT to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1295–1303
Roviello F, Caruso S, Marrelli D et al (2010) Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments. Surg Oncol e1–e17
Spratt JS, Adcock RA, Muskovin M et al (1980) Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Cancer Res 40:256–260
Stephens AD, Alderman R, Chang D et al (1999) Morbidity and mortality analysis of 200 treatments with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the coliseum technique. Ann Surg Oncol 6:790–796
Sugarbaker PH (1996) Observations concerning cancer spread within the peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles and management. Boston Kluwer Academic Publ, pp 79–100
Trimble EL, Christian MC (2006) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 100:3–4
Verwaal VJ, Bruin S, Boot H et al (2008) 8-year-follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2426–2432
Yan TD, Welch I, Black D, Sugarbaker PH (2007) A systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignancy peritoneal mesotelioma. Ann Oncol 18:827–834
Yonemura Y, De Aretxabala X, Fujimura T et al (2001) Intraoperative chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion as an adjuvant to gastric cancer: final results of a randomized controlled study. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1776–1782
Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Sasaki T et al (2010) Surgical treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. EJSO 36:1131–1138
Zieker D, Königsrainer I, Tritschler I et al (2010) Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 a promoting enzyme for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 126(6):1513–1520
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Königsrainer, I., Beckert, S., Lehmann, T. et al. Peritonealkarzinose. Chirurg 82, 375–381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2049-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2049-5
Schlüsselwörter
- Peritonealkarzinose
- Selektion
- Chirurgische Therapie
- Hypertherme intraperitoneale Chemotherapie
- Langzeitergebnisse