Skip to main content
Log in

Peritonealkarzinose

Peritoneal carcinomatosis

  • CME Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Peritonektomie (PE) kombiniert mit hyperthermer intraperitonealer Chemotherapie (HIPEC) etabliert sich zunehmend als potenziell kurative Therapieoption bei Patienten mit peritoneal metastasierten gastrointestinalen und gynäkologischen Tumoren sowie primär peritonealen Malignomen. Entscheidend für die Prognose ist die möglichst komplette Zytoreduktion, die bei den allermeisten Fällen neben der partiellen bis subtotalen parietalen PE auch eine Multiorganresektionen erforderlich macht. Im Vordergrund steht dabei, für den Patienten eine adäquate Lebensqualität bei maximaler Tumorresektion zu erhalten. Die Morbidität nach PE und HIPEC liegt in erfahrenen Zentren zwischen 25 und 35% bei einem Mortalitätsrisiko von <5%. Zu beachten sind nicht nur chirurgisch technische Aspekte und die intraoperative Entscheidungsfindung, sondern auch das intraoperative anästhesiologische Management, die Intensivtherapie, die Schmerztherapie, das Komplikationsmanagement, die Physiotherapie und anderes mehr. Die wohl größte Herausforderung im Management der Peritonealkarzinose bleibt die Patientenselektion. Der Schnittbildgebung in Verbindung mit der FDG-PET fällt hierbei eine wichtige Rolle zur Abschätzung der Operabilität zu.

Abstract

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now an established therapy with a curative option for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological peritoneal carcinomatosis as well as for primary peritoneal carcinomatous tumors. Decisive for the prognosis is a complete cytoreduction, which in most cases necessitates multi-organ resection in addition to a partial or subtotal parietal peritonectomy (PE). The highest priority is given to maintain an adequate quality of life for the patient while performing maximum tumor resection. The morbidity following PE and HIPEC in experienced centers lies between 25% and 35% with a mortality risk of <5%. Consideration must be given not only to the technical surgical aspects and the intraoperative decision-making but also to the intraoperative management, intensive care therapy, pain therapy, management of complications, physiotherapy and many more. The greatest challenge in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis is still patient selection. Computed tomography imaging together with 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) plays an important role in the assessment of operability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Al-Shammaa HA, Li Y, Yonemura Y (2008) Current status and future strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Gastroenterol 14:1159–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Esquivel J, Sticca R, Sugarbaker P et al (2007) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: a consensus statement. Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):128–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. González-Moreno S, Ortega-Pérez G, González-Bayón L (2009) Indications and patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 100:287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER (2005) FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97:183–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE et al (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82:359–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pelz JO, Stojadinovic A, Nissan A et al (2009) Evaluation of a peritoneal surface disease severity score in patients with colon cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Surg Oncol 99(1):9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfannenberg C, Königsrainer I, Aschoff P et al (2009) (18)F-FDG-PET/CT to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1295–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roviello F, Caruso S, Marrelli D et al (2010) Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments. Surg Oncol e1–e17

  10. Spratt JS, Adcock RA, Muskovin M et al (1980) Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Cancer Res 40:256–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens AD, Alderman R, Chang D et al (1999) Morbidity and mortality analysis of 200 treatments with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the coliseum technique. Ann Surg Oncol 6:790–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugarbaker PH (1996) Observations concerning cancer spread within the peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles and management. Boston Kluwer Academic Publ, pp 79–100

  13. Trimble EL, Christian MC (2006) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 100:3–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Verwaal VJ, Bruin S, Boot H et al (2008) 8-year-follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2426–2432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan TD, Welch I, Black D, Sugarbaker PH (2007) A systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignancy peritoneal mesotelioma. Ann Oncol 18:827–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yonemura Y, De Aretxabala X, Fujimura T et al (2001) Intraoperative chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion as an adjuvant to gastric cancer: final results of a randomized controlled study. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1776–1782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Sasaki T et al (2010) Surgical treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. EJSO 36:1131–1138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zieker D, Königsrainer I, Tritschler I et al (2010) Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 a promoting enzyme for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 126(6):1513–1520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Königsrainer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Königsrainer, I., Beckert, S., Lehmann, T. et al. Peritonealkarzinose. Chirurg 82, 375–381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2049-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2049-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation