Skip to main content
Log in

Population health monitoring: an essential public health field in motion

Gesundheitsmonitoring auf Bevölkerungsebene: ein wichtiger Bereich der öffentlichen Gesundheit in Bewegung

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Population health monitoring, the regular and institutionalized production and dissemination of information and knowledge about the health status of a population, is an essential element of public health. Nevertheless, while epidemiology and biostatistics, for example, are well-recognized disciplines, this does not (yet) apply to population health monitoring. Over the past decade, however, it has matured as a distinct field of expertise.

Objectives

This paper presents a comprehensive model for population health monitoring and describes its current status as a field of expertise. It concludes with an overview of the most important developments that are likely to shape the health information systems and population health monitoring practices of the future.

Results and conclusions

Combining the information pyramid (an application of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom hierarchy), describing outputs, and a so-called monitoring chain, describing activities, results in a comprehensive model for population health monitoring. The steps of the activity chain can be viewed as a stairway by which the information pyramid is climbed, reaching evidence-informed policymaking at the top. Population health monitoring has several inherent strengths, such as its high societal relevance; its integrative, comprehensive, and structured approach; and the fact that it makes use of routinely collected data. In practice, however, secondary use of routine data is often hampered by technical, motivational, economic, political, ethical, and legal barriers. Important developments that will shape health information systems and population health monitoring practices of the future include digitalization and data-driven technology, citizen science, and the growing need for intersectoral approaches. Population health monitoring practice will need to adapt in order to counteract the risks and reap the benefits that these developments hold.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Gesundheitsmonitoring auf Bevölkerungsebene – verstanden als regelmäßige und institutionalisierte Erhebung und Verbreitung von Informationen über den Gesundheitszustand einer Bevölkerung einschließlich Gesundheitsberichterstattung – ist eine wichtige Aufgabe des Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes. Doch während z. B. die Epidemiologie und Biostatistik anerkannte Disziplinen sind, gilt dies für das Gesundheitsmonitoring (noch) nicht. In den letzten zehn Jahren hat es sich jedoch zunehmend zu einem eigenständigen Gebiet entwickelt.

Zielsetzungen

Dieser Artikel stellt ein umfassendes Modell eines Gesundheitsmonitorings der Bevölkerung vor und beschreibt dessen aktuellen Status als Fachbereich. Der Artikel schließt mit einem Überblick über die wichtigsten Entwicklungen, die Gesundheitsinformationssysteme und die Praxis des Gesundheitsmonitorings in Zukunft prägen dürften.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung

Das vorgestellte Modell eines Gesundheitsmonitorings kombiniert die Informationspyramide (eine Anwendung der Daten-Information-Wissen-Weisheit-Hierarchie), die die Ergebnisse beschreibt, und den sog. Monitoringprozess, der die Aktivitäten beschreibt. Der Monitoringprozess kann als Treppe verstanden werden, über die die Informationspyramide erklommen wird, um an der Spitze eine evidenzbasierte Politikgestaltung zu erreichen. Ein so verstandenes Gesundheitsmonitoring hat mehrere inhärente Stärken. Zu diesen gehören eine hohe gesellschaftliche Relevanz, der integrative, umfassende und strukturierte Ansatz sowie die Nutzung von routinemäßig erhobenen Daten. In der Praxis stößt die sekundäre Nutzung von Routinedaten jedoch häufig auf technische, wirtschaftliche, politische, ethische und rechtliche Barrieren. Zu den wichtigen Entwicklungen, die Gesundheitsinformationssysteme und Gesundheitsmonitoring in der Zukunft prägen werden, gehören Digitalisierung und datengesteuerte Technologien, Bürgerwissenschaft (Citizen Science) und der wachsende Bedarf an sektorenübergreifenden Ansätzen. Gesundheitsmonitoring wird sich anpassen müssen, um den Risiken entgegenzuwirken und die Vorteile zu nutzen, die diese Entwicklungen mit sich bringen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As yet unpublished findings of the nine health information system assessments carried out within the InfAct Joint Action (see reference [11]). Personal communications with Neville Calleja, Ministry of Health, Malta, and Petronille Bogaert, Sciensano, Belgium, who were involved in the assessments.

  2. As yet unpublished findings of the nine health information system assessments carried out within the InfAct Joint Action (see reference [11]). Personal communications with Neville Calleja, Ministry of Health, Malta, and Petronille Bogaert, Sciensano, Belgium, who were involved in the assessments.

References

  1. Verschuuren M, van Oers H (2019) Introduction. In: Verschuuren M, van Oers H (eds) Population Health Monitoring. Climbing the Information Pyramid. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, P 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76562-4_1

  2. Graunt J (1662) Natural and political observations made upon the bills of mortality. London

  3. WHO (2020). EPHO1: Surveillance of population health and wellbeing. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/public-health-services/policy/the-10-essential-public-health-operations/epho1-surveillance-of-population-health-and-wellbeing Accessed: 25 February 2020

  4. Ackoff R‑L (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Analysis 16:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rechel B, Rosenkoetter N, Verschuuren M and van Oers H (2019) Health Information Systems. In: Verschuuren M, van Oers H (eds) Population Health Monitoring. Climbing the Information Pyramid. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, P 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76562-4_2

  6. Institute of Medicine (2011) The Learning Health System and its Innovation Collaboratives. Update Report. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/Quality/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Quality/VSRT/Core%20Documents/ForEDistrib.pdf Accessed: 25 February 2020

  7. Krumholz H‑M, Terry S‑F, MA; Waldstreicher J (2016) Data Acquisition, Curation, and Use for a Continuously Learning Health System. JAMA 316(16):1669–1670

  8. Jansen T, Coppen R, Urbanus T, Bos N, Verheij R (2019) Naar een lerend zorgsysteem voor de ambulancezorg: haalbaarheidsstudie hergebruik en gegevenskoppeling routine zorgdata. https://www.nivel.nl/nl/publicatie/naar-een-lerend-zorgsysteem-voor-de-ambulancezorg-haalbaarheidsstudie-hergebruik-en. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  9. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (1991) Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. https://www.iffs.se/en/publications/working-papers/policies-and-strategies-to-promote-social-equity-in-health/. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  10. EUPHA (2020) Public Health Monitoring and Reporting. https://eupha.org/public-health-monitoring-and-reporting. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  11. Verschuuren M, Diallo K, Calleja N, Burazeri G, Stein C (2016) First experiences with a WHO tool for assessing health information systems. Public Health. Panorama 2(3):249–400

    Google Scholar 

  12. InfAct Joint Action on Health Information (2020) WP 5: Status of health information systems in MS and regions. https://www.inf-act.eu/wp5 Accessed: 25 February 2020

  13. Bogaert P, Van Oyen H; for BRIDGE Health (2017) An integrated and sustainable EU health information system: national public health institutes’ needs and possible benefits. Arch Public Health 75:3

  14. van Panhuis W‑G, Paul P, Emerson C et al (2014) A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. Bmc Public Health 14(1144). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144

  15. van Veen E‑B (2018) Observational health research in Europe: understanding the General Data Protection Regulation and underlying debate. Eur J Cancer 104:70–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chico V (2018) The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on health research. Br Med Bull 128(1):109–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke N, Vale G, Reeves E‑P et al (2019) GDPR: an impediment to research? Ir J Med Sci 188:1129–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2020) Secondary use of health and social data. https://stm.fi/en/secondary-use-of-health-and-social-data. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  19. OECD (2019) Health in the 21st Century: Putting Data to Work for Stronger Health Systems. OECD Health Policy Studies. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-in-the-21st-century_e3b23f8e-en Accessed: 25 February 2020

  20. Oderkirk J (2017) Readiness of electronic health record systems to contribute to national health information and research. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 99. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/readiness-of-electronic-health-record-systems-to-contribute-to-national-health-information-and-research_9e296bf3-en. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  21. European Commission (2019) European Commission (2019) State of Health in the EU: Companion Report. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/2019_companion_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  22. Latulippe K, Hamel C, Giroux D (2017) Social health inequalities and ehealth: A literature review with qualitative synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies. J Med Internet Res 19(4):e136

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss D, Rydland H‑T, Øversveen E, Jensen M‑R, Solhaug S, Krokstad S (2018) Innovative technologies and social inequalities in health: A scoping review of the literature. PLoS ONE 13(4):e195447

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. University of Wisconsin System (2020) What Is Big Data? https://datasciencedegree.wisconsin.edu/data-science/what-is-big-data/ Accessed: 25 February 2020

  25. Deville P, Linard C, Martin S, Gilbert M, Stevens F‑R, Gaughan A‑E et al (2014) Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data. PNAS 111(45):15888–15893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tijhuis M, Finger J, Slobbe L, Sund R, Tolonen H (2019) Data Collection. In: Verschuuren M, van Oers H (eds) Population Health Monitoring. Climbing the Information Pyramid. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, P 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76562-4_4

  27. Ledford H (2019) Millions of black people affected by racial bias in health-care algorithms. Nature 574(7780):608–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henley J, Booth R (2020) Welfare surveillance system violates human rights, Dutch court rules. https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/05/welfare-surveillance-system-violates-human-rights-dutch-court-rules. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  29. Follett R, Strezov V (2015) An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLoS ONE 10(11):e143687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. RIVM (2015) iSPEX goes Europe: citizens measure air pollution with smartphone. https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/ispex-goes-europe-citizens-measure-air-pollution-with-smartphone Accessed: 25 February 2020

  31. McKee M, Middleton J (2019) Information wars: tackling the threat from disinformation on vaccines. BMJ 365:l2144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. WHO (2020) Urgent health challenges for the next decade. https://www.who.int/news-room/photo-story/photo-story-detail/urgent-health-challenges-for-the-next-decade Accessed: 25 February 2020

  33. United Nations (2020) Sustainable Development Goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 Accessed: 25 February 2020

  34. WHO (2020) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). https://www.who.int/sdg/en/ Accessed: 25 February 2020

  35. WHO (2018) Multisectoral and intersectoral action for improved health and well-being for all: mapping of the WHO European Region. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/371435/multisectoral-report-h1720-eng.pdf?ua=1 Accessed: 25 February 2020

  36. United Nations (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018. A Data Revolution in Motion. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2018/data_revolution Accessed: 25 February 2020

  37. United Nations (2015) A/RES/70/1 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E Accessed: 25 February 2020

  38. Eurostat (2016) Sustainable development in the European Union. A statistical glance from the viewpoint of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/7745644/KS-02-16-996-EN-N.pdf Accessed: 25 February 2020

  39. United Nations Secretary-General’s Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development (2014) A World that Counts. Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development. https://www.undatarevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-World-That-Counts.pdf Accessed: 25 February 2020

  40. Nunes A‑R, Lee K, O’Riordan T (2016) The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: the example of health and well-being. Bmj Glob Health 1:e68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kickbusch I (2010) Health in all policies: where to from here? Health Promot Int 25(3):261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A et al (2010) Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:284–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rutter H‑M‑B, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood D‑T et al (2017) The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet 390(10112):2602–2604

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marieke Verschuuren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Verschuuren and H. van Oers declare that they have no competing interests.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verschuuren, M., van Oers, H. Population health monitoring: an essential public health field in motion. Bundesgesundheitsbl 63, 1134–1142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03205-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03205-9

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation