Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Burn-out

Kann man es messen?

Burnout

Can it be measured?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Unter Burn-out wird überwiegend ein arbeitsbezogenes Syndrom verstanden, das mit gravierenden individuellen und gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen assoziiert ist. Studienziel: Der 2010 bei DIMDI erschienene HTA-Bericht „Differentialdiagnostik des Burnout-Syndroms“ beschäftigte sich mit der Frage, inwiefern Burn-out diagnostiziert und von anderen Störungen abgegrenzt werden kann. Methodik: Basierend auf einer systematischen Literaturrecherche in 36 Datenbanken werden 852 deutsch- oder englischsprachige Studien identifiziert, die zwischen 2004 und 2009 erschienen sind. Nach Berücksichtigung aller Einschluss- und Ausschlusskriterien verbleiben 25 medizinische und eine ethische Publikation. Ergebnisse: Die Evidenz der Studien ist überwiegend gering. Es werden primär Selbstbeurteilungsinstrumente eingesetzt. Es zeigt sich, dass es bisher kein allgemeingültiges Vorgehen gibt, um Burn-out zu diagnostizieren. Zudem ist Burn-out nicht einheitlich definiert. Von differenzialdiagnostischer Bedeutung sind vor allem Depressionen, Alexithymie, Befindlichkeitsstörungen und chronische Erschöpfung. Fazit: Neben einer einheitlichen Definition sind vor allem hochwertige Langzeitstudien notwendig, um das Burn-out-Phänomen in seiner Komplexität zu erfassen. Zudem muss eine international valide Variante der Diagnostik gefunden werden.

Abstract

Burnout is widely known as a work-related syndrome that is associated by serious individual and social consequences. The aim of the HTA report “Differential diagnostic of the burnout syndrome” published by DIMDI in 2010 was to determine how burnout can be diagnosed and distinguished from other disorders. Based on a systematic literature review of 36 databases, 852 studies published between 2004 and 2009 were identified. After considering inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 medical and one ethical study remained. The study evidence is predominantly low. Self-assessment tools are mainly used. The analysis showed that no standardized, common valid procedure exists to obtain a burnout diagnosis. Overall the problem is to measure a phenomenon that is not exactly defined. It is primarily important to distinguish burnout from depression, alexithymia, feeling unwell, and the concept of prolonged exhaustion. Beside the need for a valid definition, further research is needed, particularly high-quality, long-term studies, to broaden the understanding of the syndrome. Furthermore, a standardized, internationally accepted and valid procedure for diagnosing burnout is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Ananth S (2009) Experiencing personal wholeness. Explore (NY) 5(5):304–305

  2. Angerer P, Rothermund E, Limm H et al (2011) Stressbewältigungsintervention am Arbeitsplatz: Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, kontrollierten Studie. Psychotherapeut 56(1):34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awa W-L, Plaumann M, Walter U (2010) Burnout prevention: a review of intervention programs. Patient Educ Couns 78(2):184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bamber MR (2006) CBT for occupational stress in health professionals: introducing a schema-focused approach. Routledge, London

  5. Imedo (2011) http://hilfe-bei-burnout.de/auswirkungen/krankheitsstatus/

  6. Barmer GEK (2010) Barmer GEK Arztreport. Auswertungen zu den Daten bis 2008. Schwerpunkt: Erkrankungen und zukünftige Ausgaben. Asgard, St. Augustin

  7. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WidO). Pressemitteilung. 19.04.2011

  8. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (1996) Maslach burnout inventory manual. 3. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto

  9. Schaufeli WB, Van Dierendonk D (1995) A cautionary note about the cross-national and clinical validity of cut-off points for the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Psychol Rep 76:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burisch M (2006) Das Burnout-Syndrom. Theorie der inneren Erschöpfung, 3. Aufl. Springer, Berlin

  11. Rook M (1998) Theorie und Empirie in der Burnout-Forschung: Eine wissenschaftstheoretische und inhaltliche Standortbestimmung. Dr. Kovac, Hamburg

  12. Rösing I (2008) Ist die Burnout-Forschung ausgebrannt? Analyse und Kritik der internationalen Burnout-Forschung. Asanger, Kröning

  13. Taris TW, Le Blanc PM, Schaufeli WB, Schreurs PJG (2005) Are there causal relationships between the dimensions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory? A review and two longitudinal tests. Work Stress 19(3):238–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB (2005) The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 19(3):192–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gil-Monte PR (2005) Factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS) among Spanish professionals. Revista de Saúde Pública 39(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H, Ji JY (2009) Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Res Soc Work Pract 19(N3):325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh SH, Lee M (2009) Examining the psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory with a sample of child protective service workers in Korea. Children Youth Serv Rev 31(N2):206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roelofs J, Verbraak M, Keijsers GPJ et al (2005) Psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI-DV) in individuals with and without clinical burnout. Stress Health 21(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanheule S, Rosseel Y, Bogaerts S (2005) Measuring professional burnout in Dutch-speaking regions: an evaluation of the factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Psychol Belg 45(N2):147–156

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kitaoka-Higashiguchi K, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y et al (2004) Construct validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey. Stress Health 20(5):255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Worley JA, Vassar M, Wheeler DL, Barnes LLB (2008) Factor structure of scores from the Maslach Burnout Inventory – a review and meta-analysis of 45 exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic studies. Educ Psychol Meas 68(N5):797–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Breso E, Salanova M, Schaufeli WB (2007) In search of the „Third dimension“ of burnout: efficacy or inefficacy? Applied psychology: an international review. Psychologie Appliquee Revue Internationale 56(N3):460–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M (2007) Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety Stress Coping 20(2):177–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahola K, Hakanen J (2007) Job strain, burnout, and depressive symptoms: a prospective study among dentists. J Affect Disord 104(1–3):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahola K, Honkonen T, Isometsä E et al (2005) The relationship between job-related burnout and depressive disorders-results from the Finnish Health 2000 Study. J Affect Disord 88(1):55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leone SS, Huibers MJ, Knottnerus JA, Kant IJ (2007) Similarities, overlap and differences between burnout and prolonged fatigue in the working population. QJM 100(10):617–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mattila AK, Ahola K, Honkonen T et al (2007) Alexithymia and occupational burnout are strongly associated in working population. J Psychosom Res 62(6):657–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vela-Bueno A, Moreno-Jiménez B, Rodríguez-Muñoz A et al (2008) Insomnia and sleep quality among primary care physicians with low and high burnout levels. J Psychosom Res 64(4):435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalimo R, Pahkin K, Mutanten P, Toppinen-Tanner S (2003) Staying well or burning out at work. Work Stress 17(2):109–122 (Taylor & Francis)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalimo R, Toppinen S (1997) Burnout among finnish working population. Työterveyslaitos (1):58–59

  31. Schaufeli WB, Van Dierendonk D (1994) Burnout, een concept gemeten, de Nederlandse versie van de Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-NL) Burnout – the measurement of a concept: The Dutch version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-NL). Gedrag Gezondzeit 22:153–172

    Google Scholar 

  32. Karasek RA, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life, 1. Aufl. Basic Books, New York

  33. Salmela-Aro K, Kiuru N, Leskinen E, Nurmi JE (2009) School Burnout Inventory (SBI) reliability and validity. Eur J Psychol Assess 25(N1):48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. De Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Emmelkamp PM (2006) Alexithymia, risk factor or consequence of work-related stress? Psychother Psychosom 75(5):304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peters MJV, Jelicic M, Op Heij CDH, Merckelbach H (2006) Detection of feigned burnout symptoms using standard clinical questionnaires. German J Psychiatry 9(1):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kilpatrick AO (1989) Burnout correlates and validity of research design in a large panel of studies. J Health Human Res 12:25–45

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T (1993) Professional burnout: recent develompents in theory and research. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC

  38. Von Känel R (2008) Das Burnout-Syndrom: eine medizinische Perspektive. Praxis 97(9):477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aluja A, Blanch A, Garcia LF (2005) Dimensionality of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in school teachers: a study of several proposals. Eur J Psychol Assess 21(N1):67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Halbesleben JRB, Demerouti E (2005) The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work Stress 19(3):208–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Toker S, Shirom A, Shapira I et al (2005) The association between burnout, depression, anxiety, and inflammation biomarkers: C-reactive protein and fibrinogen in men and women. J Occup Health Psychol 10(4):344–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cresswell SL, Eklund RC (2006) The convergent and discriminant validity of burnout measures in sport: a multi-trait/multi-method analysis. J Sports Sci 24(2):209–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kokkinos CM (2006) Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey among elementary and secondary school teachers in Cyprus. Stress Health 22(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Devilly GJ, Wright R, Varker T (2009) Vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress or simply burnout? Effect of trauma therapy on mental health professionals. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 43(4):373–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ (2006) Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 296(9):1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Der HTA-Bericht ist von DIMDI in Auftrag gegeben worden.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Korczak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korczak, D., Huber, B. Burn-out. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 55, 164–171 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-011-1404-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-011-1404-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation