References
Saad TC (2018) The history of autonomy in medicine from antiquity to principlism. Med Health Care Philos 21(1):125–137
Koc S (2007) Responsibility and obligations physician by legal regulations. Turkderm-turk Arch Dermatol Venereol 41(2):33–38
Turkish Medical Association Disciplinary Regulation https://www.ttb.org.tr/mevzuat/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=125:tk-tablerbldl-yetmel&catid=2:ymelik&Itemid=33. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2013) Principles of biomedical ethics, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Cocanour CS (2017) Informed consent-It’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg 214(6):993–997
Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (1997) Oviedo Convention. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007cf98. Accessed 16 Oct 2021 (Article 5)
Syse A (2000) Norway: valid (as opposed to informed) consent. Lancet 356(9238):1347–1348
Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, David AS, Hayward P, Wessely S et al (2004) Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet 364(9443):1421–1427
Hall DE, Prochazka AV, Fink AS (2012) Informed consent for clinical treatment. Cmaj 184(5):533–540
Varkey B (2021) Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Med Princ Pract 30:17–28
Hanson M, Pitt D (2017) Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg 60(1):69–70
Perrenoud B, Velonaki VS, Bodenmann P, Ramelet AS (2015) The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 13(10):82–94
Levine RJ (1991) Informed consent: some challenges to the universal validity of the Western model. Law Med Health Care 19(3–4):207–213
Slim K, Bazin JE (2019) From informed consent to shared decision-making in surgery. J Visc Surg 156(3):181–184
Dahlberg J, Dahl V, Forde R, Pedersen R (2019) Lack of informed consent for surgical procedures by elderly patients with inability to consent: a retrospective chart review from an academic medical center in Norway. Patient Saf Surg 13:24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
T. Koyuncu declares that he has no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from the participant’ relatives.
The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.
Additional information
This article was translated. The German Version of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01227-3.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Scan QR code & read article online
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koyuncu, T. To cut or not to cut: medicolegal responsibility of the physician in a patient scheduled for below knee amputation without consent. Anaesthesiologie 72 (Suppl 1), 25–27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01178-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01178-9