Skip to main content
Log in

Aortokavales Kompressionssyndrom

  • Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das aortokavale Kompressionssyndrom (AKK) ist eine typische Komplikation der Spätschwangerschaft, obwohl ein Auftreten ab der 16. SSW möglich ist. Spannbreite und Schweregrad der auftretenden Symptome reichen von unspezifischen Beschwerden bis zu ausgeprägter mütterlicher Hypotonie, Bewusstlosigkeit, Kreislaufzusammenbruch und konsekutiver vitaler Gefährdung des Kindes. Ein AKK wird meist durch Einnahme der Rückenlage ausgelöst. Dadurch sind viele diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen der modernen Geburtshilfe mit einem hohen Risiko behaftet. Für den Anästhesisten wird das AKK bei der Sectio caesarea besonders relevant, da in dieser Situation mehrere Risikofaktoren aufeinander treffen. Ziel dieses Artikels ist, einen Überblick über diese schwangerschaftstypische Komplikation zu geben. Neben der Pathophysiologie werden Risikofaktoren und anästhesiologische Maßnahmen dargestellt, die das Auftreten des AKK begünstigen können. Im 2. Teil des Artikels werden prophylaktischen Maßnahmen und therapeutische Optionen erörtert und ein klinisch praktikabler Entscheidungsalgorithmus vorgestellt.

Abstract

Aortocaval compression syndrome (supine hypotensive syndrome) represents a common complication mainly of late pregnancy, although the syndrome has been described to occur as early as 16 weeks of gestation. The nature and severity of symptoms range from unspecific complaints to severe maternal hypotension, loss of consciousness, cardiovascular collapse, and consecutive fetal depression. Predominantly, the syndrome is provoked by placing the parturient supine. Since supine positioning is required for diverse diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in obstetrics, these involve increased risk of aortocaval compression. For the anesthetist, cesarean section is most relevant, because of the coincidence of several risk factors. The following article begins by reviewing the pathophysiology of the syndrome, known risk factors and anesthesiological procedures that predispose to the syndrome. The second part is concerned with prophylactic measures and therapeutic options, together with the discussion of a clinically practicable algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. American Heart Association (1997) Special resuscitation situations. In: Cummins RO (ed) Advanced cardiac life support. American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas, pp 11-1–11-19

  2. Brizgys RV, Dailey PA, Shnider SM, Kotelko DM, Levinson G (1987) The incidence and neonatal effects of maternal hypotension during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 67: 782–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell L, Klocke RA (2001) Update in nonpulmonary critical care. Implications for the pregnant patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 1051–1054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chestnut DH (1994) Obstetric anesthesia. Principles and practice. Mosby, St Louis

  5. Gomar C, Fernandez C (2000) Epidural analgesia-anaesthesia in obstetrics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17: 542–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Humphrey M, Hounslow D, Morgan S (1973) The influence of maternal posture at birth on the fetus. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 80: 1075–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones SJ, Kinsella SM, Donald FA (2003) Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 90: 86–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinsella SM, Lohmann G (1994) Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 83: 774–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinsella SM, Whitwam JG, Spencer JAD (1992) Reducing aortocaval compression: how much tilt is enough? BMJ 305: 539–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcus MAE, Van Aken H (2000) Is blood pressure the best parameter to evaluate volume preload in obstetric anaesthesie. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 13: 251–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mills GH, Chaffe AG (1994) Sleeping positions adopted by pregnant women of more than 30 weeks gestation. Anesthesia 49: 249–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rees SGO, Thurlow JA, Gardner IC, Scrutton JL, Kinsella SM (2002) Maternal cardiovascular consequences of positioning after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: left 15° table tilt vs. laft lateral. Anaesthesia 57: 15–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rocke DA, Rout CC (1995) Volume preloading, spinal hypotension and caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 75: 257–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rout CC, Rocke DA (1999) Spinal hypotension associated with caesarean section. Anesthesiology 91: 1565–1567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stamer UM, Wulf H (2001) Complications of obstetric anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 14: 317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R.-T. Kiefer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiefer, RT., Ploppa, A. & Dieterich, HJ. Aortokavales Kompressionssyndrom. Anaesthesist 52, 1073–1084 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-003-0596-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-003-0596-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation