Skip to main content
Log in

Selective nonoperative management of liver gunshot injuries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nonoperative management (NOM) of gunshot liver injuries (GLI) is infrequently practiced. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of selective NOM of GLI.

Methods

A prospective, protocol-driven study, which included patients with GLI admitted to a level 1 trauma center, was conducted over a 52-month period. Stable patients without peritonism or sustained hypotension with right-sided thoracoabdominal (RTA) and right upper quadrant (RUQ), penetrating wounds with or without localized RUQ tenderness, underwent contrasted abdominal CT scan to determine the trajectory and organ injury. Patients with established liver and/or kidney injuries, without the evidence of hollow viscus injury, were observed with serial clinical examinations. Outcome parameters included the need for delayed laparotomy, complications, the length of hospital stay and survival.

Results

During the study period, 54 (28.3%) patients of a cohort of 191 patients with GLI were selected for NOM of hemodynamic stability, the absence of peritonism and CT imaging. The average Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were 7.841 and 25 (range 4–50), respectively. 21 (39%) patients had simple (Grades I and II) and 33 (61%) patients sustained complex (Grades III to V) liver injuries. Accompanying injuries included 12 (22.2%) kidney, 43 (79.6%) diaphragm, 20 (37.0%) pulmonary contusion, 38 (70.4%) hemothoraces, and 24 (44.4%) rib fractures. Three patients required delayed laparotomy resulting in an overall success of NOM of 94.4%. Complications included: liver abscess (1), biliary fistula (5), intrahepatic A-V fistula (1) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (3). The overall median hospital stay was 6 (IQR 4–11) days, with no deaths.

Conclusion

The NOM of carefully selected patients with GLI is safe and associated with minimal morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Navsaria PH, Berli J, Edu S, Nicol AJ. Non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds: an analysis of 186 patients. S Afr J Surg. 2007;45:128–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore EE. When is nonoperative management of a gunshot wound to the liver appropriate? J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:427–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garrett KA, Stain SC, Rosati C. Nonoperative management of liver gunshot injuries. Curr Surg. 2006;63:169–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Navsaria PH, Nicol AJ, Krige JE, Edu S. Selective nonoperative management of liver gunshot Injuries. Ann Surg. 2009;249:653–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B, Sofianos C. Non operative management of penetrating liver injuries: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1986;73:736–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scalea TM. Penetrating Liver Injuries. Curr Trauma Rep. 2015;1(2):69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Renz BM, Feliciano DV. Gunshot wounds to the right thoracoabdomen: a prospective study of nonoperative management. J Trauma. 1994;37:737–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chmielewski GW, Nicholas JM, Dulchavsky SA, Diebel LN. Nonoperative management of gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Am Surg. 1995;61:665–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginzburg E, Carrillo EH, Kopelman T, McKenney MG, Kirton OC, Shatz DV, et al. The role of computed tomography in selective management of gunshot wounds to the abdomen and flank. J Trauma. 1998;45:1005–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demetriades D, Gomez H, Chahwan S, Charalambides K, Velmahos G, Murray J, et al. Gunshot injuries to the liver: the role of selective nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:343–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Omoshoro-Jones JA, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Zellweger R, Krige JE, Kahn D. Selective non-operative management of liver gunshot injuries. Br J Surg. 2005;92:890–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pal KM, Khan A. Nonoperative management of penetrating liver trauma. Injury. 2000;31:199–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Chiu WC, Killeen KL, Scalea TM. Triple-contrast helical CT in penetrating torso trauma: a prospective study to determine peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1247–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DuBose J, Inaba K, Teixeira PG, Pepe A, Dunham MB, McKenney M. Selective nonoperative management of solid organ injury following abdominal gunshot wounds. Injury. 2007;38:1084–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marr JDF, Krige JEJ, Terblanche J. Analysis of 153 gunshot wounds of the liver. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1030–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Demetriades D, Hadjizacharia P, Constantinou C, Brown C, Inaba K, Rhee P, et al. Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. Ann Surg. 2006;244:620–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Renz BM, Bott J, Feliciano DV. Failure of nonoperative treatment of a gunshot wound to the liver predicted by computed tomography. J Trauma. 1996;40:191–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dabbs DN, Stein DM, Scalea TM. Major hepatic necrosis: a common complication after angioembolization for treatment of high-grade liver injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2009;66(3):621–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Michailidou M, Velmahos GC, Wilden G, Alam HB, de Moya M, Chang Y. Blush on trauma computed tomography: not as bad as we think. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):580–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dabbs DN, Stein DM, Philosophe B, Scalea TM. Treatment of major hepatic venous: lobectomy versus serial debridements. J Trauma. 2010;69:562–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Philips T, Scalafini SJ, Goldstein A, Scalea T, Panetta T, Shaftan G. Use of contrast–enhanced CT enema in the management of penetrating trauma of the flank and back. J Trauma 986; 6:593–601.

  22. Sherck J, Shatney C, Sensaki K, Selivanov V. The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt small bowel perforation. Am J Surg. 1994;168:670–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bala M, Gazalla SA, Faroja M, Bloom AI, Zamir G, Rivkind AI, et al. Complications of high grade liver injuries: management and outcome with focus on bile leaks. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-20 (PMCID: PMC3352307).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Navsaria PH, Nicol AJ. Selective nonoperative management of kidney gunshot injuries. World J Surg. 2009;33:553–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Cornwell EE III, et al. Selective management of renal gunshot wounds. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1121–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wessells H, McAninch JW, Meyer A, Bruce J. Criteria for nonoperative management of significant penetrating renal lacerations. J Urol. 1997;157:2427.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moolman C, Navsaria PH, Lazarus J, Pontin A, Nicol AJ. Nonoperative management of penetrating kidney injuries: a prospective audit. J Urol. 2012;188:169 – 73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leukhardt WH, Golob JF, McCoy AM, Fadlalla AM, et al. Follow-up disparities after trauma: a real problem for outcomes research. Am J Surg. 2010;199:348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Navsaria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Pradeep Navsaria, Andrew Nicol, Jake Krige, Sorin Edu and Sharfuddin Chowdhury declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by the institutional ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards: University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee approved study: 048/2007.

Informed consent

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data (observational study); therefore, no consent was taken. The patients were managed according to standard Unit protocols. All data were collected by the first author on a password-protected computer and Excel sheet. None of the patients could be identified in the database as they were numbered consecutively from 1 to 278. The privacy and confidentiality interests of participants were preserved. No information can identify individuals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navsaria, P., Nicol, A., Krige, J. et al. Selective nonoperative management of liver gunshot injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45, 323–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0913-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0913-z

Keywords

Navigation