Abstract
Background
Trauma registries (TR) collect information about trauma patients according to inclusion criteria, and it helps to establish protocols to improve care. However, all TR deal with incompleteness. The aim of this study is to assess the number of patients not included despite fulfilling inclusion criteria in our regional TR and identifying the predictors for being missing.
Methods
The sample was randomly selected. Two months of each year from 2010 to 2014 (5 years) were selected, and medical files of all patients attended in the emergency department room during those months were studied. Patients who were already correctly included in the TR were assigned to the ‘included’ group, and patients who should have been but were not to the ‘missing’ group. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for being missed from the TR.
Results
Of a total of 200, 79 (40 % approximately) were identified as missing. We defined the characteristic profiles of missing patients and found that the hospital RTS and the number of injuries are independent predictors to be missing in our trauma registry, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1844 [95 % (1092–3114) and 0.574 (95 % CI 0.428–0.770)], respectively.
Conclusions
Overall, 40 % of the patients who met the inclusion criteria of the TR were not included in the registry. Our results can be generalized to other trauma records based on Utstein style, because we think probably that this fact is also happening in other databases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pfeifer R, Tarkin IS, Rocos B, Pape HC. Patterns of mortality and causes of death in polytrauma patients–has anything changed? Injury. 2009;40(9):907–11.
Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGUTM: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):476.
Morrissey BE, Delaney RA, Johnstone AJ, Petrovick L, Smith RM. Do trauma systems work? A comparison of major trauma outcomes between Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Massachusetts General Hospital. Injury. 2015;46(1):150–5.
Heim C, Bosisio F, Roth A, et al. Is trauma in Switzerland any different? epidemiology and patterns of injury in major trauma—a 5-year review from a swiss trauma centre. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13958.
Watts HF, Kerem Y, Kulstad EB. Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012;5(2):131–4.
O’Mullane PA, Mikocka-Walus AA, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA. Incidence and outcomes of major trauma assaults: a population-based study in Victoria. Public Health. 2009;190(3):129–32.
Olthof DC, Peters RW, Klooster M, Goslings JC. Missing patients in a regional trauma registry: incidence and predictors. Injury. 2014;45(9):1488–92.
Prat S, Dominguez-Sampedro P, Koo M, Colilles C, Jimenez-Fabrega X, Espinosa L. TraumCat: preliminary analysis of a year of severe trauma registry in Catalonia. Emergency. 2014;26(4):267–74.
O’Reilly GM, Gabbe B, Cameron PA. Trauma registry methodology: a survey of trauma registry custodians to determine current approaches. Injury. 2015;46(2):201–6.
Hlaing T, Hollister L, Aaland M. Trauma registry data validation: essential for quality trauma care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2006;61(6):1400–7.
O’Reilly GM, Jolley DJ, Cameron PA, Gabbe B. Missing in action: a case study of the application of methods for dealing with missing data to trauma system benchmarking. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(10):1122–9.
Fortún M, Ali B, Montes LM, Rey JM, Teijeira R, Belzunegui T. Inclusion of prehospital mortality statistics in severe trauma registries: a study of its influence on trauma lethality rates and survival prediction. Emergencias. 2016;28:173–8.
Belzunegui T, Gradín C, Fortún M, Cabodevilla A, Barbachano A, Sanz JA. Major trauma registry of Navarre (Spain): the accuracy of different survival prediction models. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(9):1382–8.
Belzunegui T, FortúnM, Reyero D, Teijeira R. Implementation of the first Spanish population-based register for multiple-injury cases in Navarre. Emergency. 2013;25:196–200.
Ringdal KG, Coats TJ, Lefering R, Di Bartolomeo S, Steen PA, Roise O, et al. The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008;16(1):7.
Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al. The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1356–65.
Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ, et al. Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(5):756–68.
Moore L, Hanley J, Lavoie A, Turgeon A. Evaluating the validity of multiple imputation for missing physiological data in the national trauma data bank. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2:73–9.
López-Ruiz M, Martínez JM, Pérez K, Novoa AM, Tobías A, Benavides FG. Impact of road safety interventions on traffic-related occupational injuries in Spain, 2004–2010. Accident Anal Prev. 2014;66:114–9.
Dinh MM, Roncal S, Byrne CM, Petchell J. Growing trend in older patients with severe injuries: mortality and mechanisms of injury between 1991 and 2010 at an inner city major trauma centre. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:65–9.
Lefering R, Ruchholtz S. Trauma registries in Europe. Europ J Trauma Emerg Med. 2012;38:1–2.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the emergency department doctors and data managers from centres that participated in the research. We would also like to thank Silvia Ayerra and Imanol Pinto for their extremely valuable contribution to the implementation of the IT application.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Bismil Ali Ali, Mariano Fortun Moral, Tomas Belzunegui Otano, Berta Ibañez Beroiz, Koldo Iñaki Cambra Contin, and Arkaitz Jimenez Galbete declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Permission note (ethics)
The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Health of the government of Navarre. The subjects gave their informed consent to the work. The investigation carried out was approved and evaluated by the National Agency for Quality and Accreditation of Spain, ANECA.
Annex 1. Basic form
Annex 1. Basic form
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, B.A., Fortún, M., Belzunegui, T. et al. Missing patients in “Major Trauma Registry” of Navarre: incidence and pattern. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 671–683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0717-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0717-y