Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thinking outside the box: re-evaluating the approach to penetrating cardiac injuries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Penetrating cardiac injuries are infrequent but highly lethal. To address these injuries, cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiothoracic surgery availability are required for Level I trauma center verification. However, acute care surgeons are more readily available for this time-sensitive injury. The purpose of this study was to review an acute care surgery-based experience with penetrating cardiac trauma at an urban Level 1 trauma center. Our hypothesis was that care provided solely by acute care surgeons was both safe and effective for this patient population.

Methods

All patients with injuries to the ‘cardiac box’ following penetrating thoracic trauma were identified from 2005–2010. Demographic and injury related data were obtained. The types and location of cardiac injury, as well as patient outcomes, were determined from operative reports.

Results

1701 patients with penetrating chest trauma were admitted during the study period. 260 patients were identified as having high-risk injuries and were included in the review. 37 patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy, with a survival rate of 8 %. 76 patients (29 %) suffered a cardiac injury. 72 % of these patients had a preoperative FAST exam, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 56.5 and 82.5 % respectively. 82 % underwent a pericardial window, which had a positive predictive value of 81.4 %. 61 % (n = 46) of the patients with a cardiac injury survived, while the overall death rate in this cohort was 21 %. No patients in the cohort required cardiopulmonary bypass for emergent repair of cardiac injury and acute care surgeons performed all cases.

Conclusion

Penetrating injury to the heart is highly lethal and time-sensitive. Increasingly, FAST and subxyphoid pericardial window are relied upon to make the diagnosis in patients arriving in varying stages of shock to the resuscitation room. Acute care surgeons are the most appropriate surgeons to care for these injuries and provide safe and effective care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Beningfield S, et al. Screening for occult penetrating cardiac injuries. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):573–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rupprecht H, Ghidau M. Penetrating nail-gun injury of the heart managed by adenosine-induced asystole in the absence of a heart-lung machine. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014;41(4):429–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chughtai TS, Gilardino MS, Fleiszer DM, et al. An expanding role for cardiopulmonary bypass in trauma. Can J Surg. 2002;45(2):95–103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaljusto ML, Skaga NO, Pillgram-Larsen J, et al. Survival predictor for penetrating cardiac injury; a 10-year consecutive cohort from a Scandinavian trauma center. Scandinavian J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asensio JA, Berne JD, Demetriades D, et al. One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 1998;44(6):1073–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira BMT, Nogueira VB, Calderan TRA, et al. Penetrating cardiac trauma: a 20-year experience from a university teaching hospital. J Surg Res. 2013;183(2):E1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. ACS Orange Book. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2014.

  8. Beck CS. Two cardiac compression trials. JAMA. 1935;104:714–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker L, Almadani A, Ball CG. False negative pericardial focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination following cardiac rupture from blunt thoracic trauma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2015;9:155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong VY, Oosthuizen G, Sartorius B, et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries and the evolving management algorithm in the current era. J Surg Res. 2015;193:926–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thorson CM, Namias N, Van Haren RM, et al. Does hemopericardium after chest trauma mandate sternotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1518–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thourani VH, Feliciano DV, Cooper WA, et al. Penetrating cardiac trauma at an urban trauma center: a 22-year perspective. Am Surg. 1999;65:811–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Waes OJ, Van Riet PA, Van Lieshout EM, et al. Immediate thoracotomy for penetrating injuries: ten years’ experience at a Dutch level I trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38(5):543–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabinovici R. Sixty-seven consecutive resuscitative thoracotomies by a single surgeon. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(2):156–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhee PM, Acosta J, Bridgeman A, et al. Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(3):288–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozycki G, Ochsner M, Schmidt J, et al. A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. J Trauma. 1995;39:492–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV, Ochsner MG, et al. The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma. 1999;46:543–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Plurad DS, Bricker S, Van Natta TL, et al. Penetrating cardiac injury and the significance of chest computed tomography findings. Emerg Radiol. 2013;20:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arom KV, Richardson JD, Webb G, et al. Subxyphoid pericardial window in patients with suspected traumatic pericardial tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977;23:545Y549.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trinkle JK, Toon RS, Franz JL, et al. Affairs of the wounded heart: penetrating cardiac wounds. J Trauma. 1979;19:467Y472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hommes M, Nicol AJ, van der Stok J, et al. Subxyphoid pericardial window to exclude occult cardiac injury after thoracoabdominal trauma. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1454–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Onan B, Demirhan R, Oz K, et al. Cardiac and great vessel injuries after chest trauma: our 10 year experience. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;17(5):423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Savage.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ethan W. Stranch, Ben L. Zarzaur and Stephanie A. Savage have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stranch, E.W., Zarzaur, B.L. & Savage, S.A. Thinking outside the box: re-evaluating the approach to penetrating cardiac injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 617–622 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0680-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0680-7

Keywords

Navigation