Skip to main content
Log in

Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The advantages of the conservative approach for major spleen injuries are still debated. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NOM in the treatment of minor (grade I-II according with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; AAST) and severe (AAST grade III-V) blunt splenic trauma, following a standardized treatment protocol.

Methods

All the hemodynamically stable patients with computer tomography (CT) diagnosis of blunt splenic trauma underwent NOM, which included strict clinical and laboratory observation, 48–72 h contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) follow-up and splenic angioembolization, performed both in patients with admission CT evidence of vascular injuries and in patients with falling hematocrit during observation.

Results

87 patients [32 (36.7 %) women and 55 (63.2 %) men, median age 34 (range 14–68)] were included. Of these, 28 patients (32.1 %) had grade I, 22 patients (25.2 %) grade II, 20 patients (22.9 %) grade III, 11 patients (12.6 %) grade IV and 6 patients (6.8 %) grade V injuries. The overall success rate of NOM was 95.4 % (82/87). There was no significant difference in the success rate between the patients with different splenic injuries grade. Of 24 patients that had undergone angioembolization, 22 (91.6 %) showed high splenic injury grade. The success rate of embolization was 91.6 % (22/24). No major complications were observed. The minor complications (2 pleural effusions, 1 pancreatic fistula and 2 splenic abscesses) were successfully treated by EAUS or CT guided drainage.

Conclusions

The non operative management of blunt splenic trauma, according to our protocol, represents a safe and effective treatment for both minor and severe injuries, achieving an overall success rate of 95 %. The angiographic study could be indicated both in patients with CT evidence of vascular injuries and in patients with high-grade splenic injuries, regardless of CT findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NOM:

Non operative management

AAST:

American association for the surgery of trauma

CT:

Computer tomography

CEUS:

Contrast enhanced ultrasonography

FAST:

Focused assessment sonography for trauma

References

  1. Gaines BA. Intra-abdominal solid organ injury in children: diagnosis and treatment. J Trauma. 2009;67:S135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, Moser KS, Brennan R, Read RA. Pons PT epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995;38(2):185–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith J, Caldwell E, D’Amours S, Jalaludin B, Sugrue M. Abdominal trauma: a disease in evolution. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(9):790–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hancock GE, Farquharson AL. Management of splenic injury. J R Army Med Corps. 2012;158(4):288–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dupuy DE, Raptopoulos V, Fink MP. Current concepts in splenic trauma. J Intensive Care Med. 1995;10(2):76–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akinkuole AA, Lawal OO, Arowolo OA, Agbakwuru EA, Adesunkanmi ARK. Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma. S Afr J Surg. 2010;48(1):15–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costa G, Tierno SM, Tomassini F, Venturini L, Frezza B, Cancrini G, Stella F. The epidemiology and clinical evaluation of abdominal trauma. An analysis of a multidisciplinary trauma registry. Ann Ital Chir. 2010;81:95–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Vlies CH, Hoekstra J, Ponsen KJ, Reekers JA, van Delden OM, Goslings JC. Impact of splenic artery embolization on the success rate of nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cirocchi R, Corsi A, Castellani E, Barberini F, Renzi C, Cagini L, Boselli C, Noya G. Case series of non-operative management vs. operative management of splenic injury after blunt trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(2):91–6. doi:10.5505/tjtes.2014.99442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shakford SR, Molin MR. Management of splenic injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 1990;70:595–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR, Spencer FC. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma. Ann Surg. 1998;227:708–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clancy AA, Tiruta C, Ashman D, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW. The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective nonoperative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Corsi A, Farinella E, Listorti C, Trastulli S, Renzi C, Desiderio J, Santoro A, Cagini L, Parisi A, Redler A, Noya G, Fingerhut A. Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R185. doi:10.1186/cc12868.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dent D, Alsabrook G, Erickson BA, Myers J, Wholey M, Stewart R, Root H, Ferral H, Postoak D, Napier D, Pruitt BA Jr. Blunt splenic injuries: high nonoperative management rate can be achieved with selective embolization. J Trauma. 2004;56:1063–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaarder C, Dormagen JB, Eken T, Skaga NO, Klow NE, Pillgram-Larsen J, Buanes T, Naess PA. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization. J Trauma. 2006;61:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhotra AK, Carter RF, Lebman DA, Carter DS, Riaz OJ, Aboutanos MB, Duane TM, Ivatury RR. Preservation of splenic immunocompetence after splenic artery angioembolization for blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2010;69:1126–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Franklin GA, Casós SR. Current advances in the surgical approach to abdominal trauma. Injury. 2006;37:1143–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu CY, Wu SC, Chen RJ, Chen YF, Wang YC, Huang HC, Huang JC, Lu CW, Lin WC. Evaluation of need for operative intervention in blunt splenic injury: intraperitoneal contrast extravasation has an increased probability of requiring operative intervention. World J Surg. 2010;34:2745–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams MD, Young DH, Svhiller WR. Trand toward nonoperative management of splenic injuries. Am J Surg. 1990;160:588–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakae H, Shimazu T, Miyauchi H, Morozumi J, Ohta S, Yamaguchi Y, Kishikawa M, Ueyama M, Kitano M, Ikeuchi H, Yukioka T, Sugimoto H. Does splenic preservation treatment (embolization, splenorrhaphy, and partial splenectomy) improve immunologic function and long-term prognosis after splenic injury? J Trauma. 2009;67:557–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skattum J, Naess PA, Gaarder C. Non-operative management and immune function after splenic injury. Br J Surg. 2012;99(Suppl 1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scaglione M, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Scialpi M, Merola S, Diettrich AI, Lombardo P, Romano L, Grassi R. Blunt trauma to the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: is there a role for helical CT in the decision-making process? Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(1):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, Shackford SR, Malangoni MA, Champion HR. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma. 1995;38:323–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: a scoring chart. J Trauma. 1985;25:60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Advanced Trauma Life Support®—ATLS®—Student Manual. 9th ed. American College of Surgeon. ISBN: 978-1880696026.

  26. Haan JM, Bochicchio GV, Kramer N, Scalea TM. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience. J Trauma. 2005;58(3):492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pietzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L, et al. Blunt splenic injury in adults: multi-institutional study of the eastern association for the surgery of Trauma. J Trauma. 2000;49(2):177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Lal N, Bowley DM. Meta-analysis of predictive factors and outcomes for failure of non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma. Injury. 2012;43(9):1337–46. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bouglé A, Harrois A, Duranteau J. Resuscitative strategies in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):1. doi:10.1186/2110-5820-3-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Filipescu D, Hunt BJ, Komadina R, Nardi G, Neugebauer E, Ozier Y, Riddez L, Schultz A, Vincent JL, Rossaint R. Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R76. doi:10.1186/cc1268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gheju I, Venter MD, Beuran M, Gulie L, Racoveanu I, Carstea P, et al. Grade IV blunt splenic injury—the role of proximal angioembolization. A case report and review of literature. J Med Life. 2013;6(4):369–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Olthof DC, van der Vlies CH, Joosse P, van Delden OM, Jurkovich GJ, Goslings JC; PYTHIA Collaboration Group. Consensus strategies for the nonoperative management of patients with blunt splenic injury: a Delphi study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1567–74. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182921627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhullar IS, Frykberg ER, Tepas JJ 3rd, Siragusa D, Loper T, Kerwin AJ. At first blush: absence of computed tomography contrast extravasation in Grade IV or V adult blunt splenic trauma should not preclude angioembolization. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1):105–11. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182788cd2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dormagen J, Meyerdierks O, Gaarder C, Naess P, Sandvik L, Klow NE. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the injured spleen after embolization–comparison with computed tomography. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(5):485–91. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1246003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Brillantino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Antonio Brillantino, Francesca Iacobellis, Umberto Robustelli, Elisabetta Villamaina, Franco Maglione, Olga Colletti, Maurizio De Palma, Fiorella Paladino and Giuseppe Noschese declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The study involves Human Participants and the ethical committee of our Institution approved the study protocol.

Informed consent

All the patients gave informed written consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brillantino, A., Iacobellis, F., Robustelli, U. et al. Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42, 593–598 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0575-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0575-z

Keywords

Navigation