Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges in the training of military surgeons: experiences from Dutch combat operations in southern Afghanistan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To improve care for battle casualties, we analyzed the surgical workload during the Dutch deployment to Uruzgan, Afghanistan. This surgical workload was compared with the resident surgical training and the pre-deployment medical specialist program.

Methods

Patient data from the trauma registry (2006–2010) at the Dutch Role 2 Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) were analyzed. The case logs of chief residents (n = 15) from the general surgery training program in the Netherlands were used for comparison.

Results

The trauma registry query yielded 2,736 casualties, among whom 60 % (1,635/2,736) were classified as disease non-battle casualties and 40 % (1,101/2,736) as battle casualties. During the study period, 1,427 casualties (336 pediatric cases) required 2,319 surgical procedures. Each graduating chief resident handled an average of 1,444 cases, including 165 laparotomies, 19 major vessel repairs, 28 amputations, and 153 fracture stabilizations, during their residency. Residents had limited exposure to injuries requiring a thoracotomy, craniotomy, nephrectomy, IVC repair, or external genital trauma.

Conclusions

The injuries treated at the Dutch Role 2 MTF were often severe, and exposure to pediatric cases was much higher than reported for other combat hospitals in Iraq and in Afghanistan. The current civilian resident training does not equip the trainees with the minimally required competences of a fully trained military surgeon. The recognition in the Netherlands of military surgery as a subspecialty within general (trauma) surgery, with a formal training curriculum, should be considered. The introduction of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military (and Disaster) Surgery standard may facilitate the achievement of this aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoencamp R, Idenburg FJ, Hamming JF, Tan ECTH. Incidence and epidemiology of casualties treated from August 2006 to August 2010 at the Dutch role 2E at multi national base Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan. World J Surg. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2462-x.

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Kruijff LGM, Mert A, van der Meer F, Huizinga EP, de Wissel MJ, van der Wurff P. Dutch military casualties of the war in Afghanistan—quality of life and level of participation after rehabilitation. Ned TijdschrGeneeskd. 2012;155(35):A4233.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Kruijff LGM, van der Krans A, Mert A. Reintegration of Dutch war casualties; what is the impact on family relations and job commitment? Ned Mil Geneeskd Tijdschr. 2012;65:3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huizinga E, van der Hem JA, Blokhuis TJ. Repatriation and care of a battle casualty in Uruzgan. Ned Tijdschr Trauma. 2012;20(2):32–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramasamy A, Hinsley DE, Edwards DS, Stewart MP, Midwinter M, Parker PJ. Skill sets and competencies for the modern military surgeon: lessons from UK military operations in Southern Afghanistan. Injury. 2010;41:453–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Willy C, Hauer T, Huschitt N, Palm HG. “Einsatzchirurgie”—experiences of German military surgeons in Afghanistan. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396:507–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kearney SP, Bluman EM, Lonergan KT, Arrington ED, Ficke JR. Preparedness of orthopaedic surgeons for modern battlefield surgery. Mil Med. 2012;177:1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenfeld JV. How will we produce the next generation of military surgeons? Re: skill sets and competencies for the modern military surgeon: lessons from UK military operations in Southern Afghanistan. Injury. 2010;41:435–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyler JA, Ritchie JD, Leas ML, Edwards KD, Eastridge BE, White CE, et al. Combat readiness for the modern military surgeon: data from a decade of combat operations. J Trauma. 2012;73:S64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tyler JA, Clive KS, White CE, Beekley AC, Blackbourne LH. Current US military operations and implications for military surgical training. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:658–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnet S, Gonzalez F, Poichotte A, Duverger V, Pons F. Lessons learned from the experience of visceral military surgeons in the French role 3 Medical Treatment Facility of Kabul (Afghanistan): an extended skill mix required. Injury. 2012;43(8):1301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gawande A. Casualties of war-military care for the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2471–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. LNAZ. Traumazorg in Beeld: Landelijke Traumaregistratie 2007–2011: rapportage Nederland. Tilburg: LNAZ; 2013.

  14. Central Bureau of Statistics of the Netherlands. Diseased by primary cause of death. Available at http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=37683&D1=2-103&D2=0&D3=a&D4=12-15&VW=T. Accessed 30 December 2013.

  15. Bruinsma MY, Moors JA. Illegale vuurwapens. gebruik, bezit en handel in Nederland 2001–2003. Tilburg/Den Haag: IVA Beleidsonderzoek en advies/WODC (Ministerie van justitie); 2005.

  16. Waes OJF, Van Riet PA, Van Lieshout EMM, Hartog DD. Immediate thoracotomy for penetrating injuries: ten years’ experience at a Dutch level I trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:543–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox JP, Tyler JA, Paulick J, et al. Iraq, integrated programs, and training military surgeons. In: ACS 2008 Clinical Congr; 2008 Oct 12–16; San Francisco, CA, USA.

  18. Martin MJ, Dubose JJ, Rodriguez C, Dorlac WC, Beilman GJ, Rasmussen TE, et al. “One front and one battle”: civilian professional medical support of military surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(3):432–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan MC, Sue G, Bucholz E, Yeo H, Bell RH Jr, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Effect of program type on the training experiences of 248 university, community, and US military-based general surgery residencies. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coppola CP, Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL. Children treated at an expeditionary military hospital in Iraq. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:972–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kosovo Parker PJ. A surgical template for modern conflict. J R Army Med Corps. 1999;2000(146):199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deering SH, Rush RM, Lesperance RN, Roth BJ. Perceived effects of deployments on surgeon and physician skills in the US Army Medical Department. Am J Surg. 2011;201:666–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. NATO. COMEDS homepage. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49168.htm. Accessed 26 Jan 2014.

  24. AAAM. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)—1985 revision. Des Plaines: American Association for Automotive Medicine; 1985.

  25. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–96.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Therien SP, Nesbitt ME, Duran-Stanton AM, Gerhardt RT. Prehospital medical documentation in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry: a retrospective study. J Trauma. 2011;71:S103–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoencamp R, Idenburg FJ, Vermetten HGJM, Leenen LPH, Hamming JF (2014) Lessons learned from the Dutch deployed surgeons and anaesthesiologists to Afghanistan: February 2006-November 2010. Mil Med (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Ministry of Defense for approving this protocol. In particular, we wish to thank LCOL DN Baalbergen for his logistical assistance.

Conflict of interest

Rigo Hoencamp, Edward Tan, FlorisIdenburg, Arul Ramasamy, Teun van Egmond, Luke Leenen, and Jaap Hamming declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee and was therefore performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hoencamp.

Additional information

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Ministry of Defense and the UK and Dutch governments. The authors are employees of the UK or Dutch government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoencamp, R., Tan, E.C.T.H., Idenburg, F. et al. Challenges in the training of military surgeons: experiences from Dutch combat operations in southern Afghanistan. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 421–428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0401-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0401-z

Keywords

Navigation