Erratum to: Should hyperthermia be included in the benefit catalogue for oncologic indications? Commercial interests are presumed behind the editorial of R. Sauer et al.

The authors regret a typing error on page 84 in the section Authors’ reply by R. Sauer, H. Crezee et al. The correct subheading should be (indicated in italics): The letter of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute is unnecessarily polarizing to the discussion on whether or not hyperthermia is evidence based.