Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibiotikazumischung zum Knochenzement beim septischen Prothesenwechsel

Addition of antibiotics to bone cement for septic prosthesis exchange

  • Operative Techniken
  • Published:
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Operationsziel

Sanierung einer periprothetischen Infektion durch lokale Antibiotikatherapie in maximaler Dosierung. Als Trägermaterial wird handelsüblicher Knochenzement verwendet. Antibiotikahaltiger Knochenzement ist in der Orthopädie ein etabliertes Mittel zur Fixierung zementierter Implantate beim künstlichen Gelenkersatz. Er gehört in der Primär- und Revisionsendoprothetik neben der systemischen Gabe von Antibiotika zur routinemäßigen lokalen Antibiotikaprophylaxe.

Indikation

Bei der Behandlung periprothetischer Infektionen (PPI) nutzt man antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement bei zweizeitigen septischen Wechseloperationen im prothesenfreien Intervall als Spacer und zur Reimplantation bei der zweiten Operation. Bei einzeitigen septischen Wechseloperationen ist er ein essentielles Mittel, um lokal ausreichende Antibiotikakonzentrationen zu erreichen, die nach radikalem Débridement des infizierten Gewebes eine direkte Reimplantation erlauben. Die hohe Antibiotikakonzentration verhindert die Rekolonisierung und Biofilmbildung auf der Oberfläche des neuen Implantats.

Kontraindikation

PPI mit Keimen, die auf die beimischbaren Antibiotika nachweislich resistent sind. Anästhesiologische Inoperabilität des Patienten. Nachgewiesene Allergie des Patienten auf Substanzen, die dem Zement beigemischt werden oder darin enthalten sind.

Operationstechnik

Homogenisieren des Antibiotikapulvers. Zumischung der Antibiotika zur Pulverphase des Knochenzements. Homogenisieren des Antibiotika-Zement-Gemischs im Rührsystem. Vermengen mit dem flüssigen Monomer und üblicher Rührvorgang. Zementapplikation auf gewohnte Art.

Abstract

Objective

Decontamination of periprosthetic infections by local antibiotic therapy with maximum dosing. Commercially available bone cement is used as the carrier material. Bone cement containing antibiotics is an established procedure in orthopedics for the fixation of cemented implants in artificial joint replacement. It is part of the primary and revision endoprosthetic treatment together with systemic administration of antibiotics for routine local antibiotic prophylaxis.

Indications

Bone cement containing antibiotics is used in the treatment of periprosthetic infections for two-stage septic exchange operations as a spacer in the prosthesis-free interval and for reimplantation in the second operation. In one-stage septic exchange operations it is an essential means of achieving a locally sufficient antibiotic concentration, which allows direct reimplantation following radical débridement of the infected tissue. The high antibiotic concentration prevents recolonization and formation of a biofilm on the surface of the new implant.

Contraindications

Periprosthetic infections with pathogens which are known to be resistant to the antibiotics used in the mixture. Unsuitability of patients for surgery under anesthesia. Known allergies of patients to substances mixed with or contained in the cement.

Operation technique

Homogenization of the powdered antibiotic. Mixing of the antibiotic with the powder phase of the bone cement. Homogenization of the antibiotic-cement mixture by stirring. Addition of the liquid monomer and the usual mixing procedure. Application of the cement in the routine manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Adams K, Couch L, Cierny G, Calhoun J, Mader JT (1992) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic impregnated polymetylmethacrylate beads. Clin Orthop Relat Res 278:244–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anagnostakos P, Schmitt E, Kelm J (2009) Elution of gentamicin and vancomycin from polymethylmethacrylate beads and hip spacers in vivo. Acta Orthop 80(2):193–197 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Anagnostakos%20K%5BAuthor%5D%26cauthor=true%26cauthor_uid=19404802)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Lodenkamper H (1979) The infected joint implant. In: McKibbin B (Hrsg) Recent advances in orthopaedics. Churchill Livingstone, New York, S 139–161

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H (1970) Über die Depotwirkung einiger Antibiotika bei Vermischung mit dem Kunstharz Palacos. Chirurg 41:511–515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen AF, Parvizi J (2014) Antibiotic-loaded bone cement and periprosthetic joint infection. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 24(2–3):89–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink B, Vogt S, Reinsch M, Büchner H (2011) Sufficient release of antibioticby a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3141–3147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Frommelt L (2007) Antibiotic choices in bone surgery – local therapy using antibiotic-loaded bone cement. In: Walenkamp GHIM (Hrsg) Local antibiotics in Arthroplasty. State of the art from the interdisciplinary point of view. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart,New York, S 59–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frommelt L (2006) Principles of systemic antimicrobial therapy in foreign material associated infection in bone tissue, with special focus on periprosthetic infection. Injury 37(Suppl 2):87–94 (May)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gehrke T, Zahar A, Kendoff D (2013) One-stage exchange: it all began here. Bone Jt J 95-B(11 Suppl A):77–83 (Nov)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kühn KD, Ege W, Gopp U (2005) Acrylic bone cements: mechanical and physical properties. Orthop Clin North Am 29:20–39

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kühn KD (2007) Antibiotic-loaded bone cements – antibiotic release and influence on mechanical properties. In: Walenkamp GHIM (Hrsg) Local antibiotics in Arthroplasty. State of the art from the interdisciplinary point of view. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart,New York, S 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kühn KD (2014) PMMA cements. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis G (2015) Not all approved antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement brands are the same: ranking using the utility materials selection concept. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26(1):5388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaren AC, Nugent M, Economopoulos K, Kaul H, Vernon BL, McLemore R (2009) Hand-mixed and premixed antibiotic-loaded bone cement have similar homogeneity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1693–1698 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Kaul%20H%5BAuthor%5D%26cauthor=true%26cauthor_uid=19390905)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Paz E, Sanz-Ruiz P, Abenojar J, Vaquero-Martín J, Forriol F, Del Real JC (2015) Evaluation of Elution and Mechanical Properties of High-Dose Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement: Comparative “In Vitro” Study of the Influence of Vancomycin and Cefazolin. J Arthroplast 30(8):1423–1429 (Mar 7) doi:S0883-5403(15)00164–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peñalba Arias P, Furustrand Tafin U, Bétrisey B, Vogt S, Trampuz A, Borens O (2015) Activity of bone cement loaded with daptomycin alone or in combination with gentamicin or PEG600 against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Injury 46(2):249–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pithankuakul K, Samranvedhya W, Visutipol B, Rojviroj S (2014) The effects of different mixing speeds on the elution and strength of high-dose antibiotic-loaded bone cement created with the hand-mixed technique. J Arthroplast 30(5):858–863 (Dec 5) doi:S0883-5403(14)00916–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Romanò CL, Gala L, Logoluso N, Romanò D, Drago L (2012) Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(12):2445–2453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart PS, Costerton JW (2001) Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsung JD, Rohrsheim JA, Whitehouse SL, Wilson MJ, Howell JR (2014) Management of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty using a custom made articulating spacer (CUMARS); the Exeter experience. J Arthroplast 29(9):1813–1818 (Sep) doi:10.1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahlig H, Buchholz HW (1972) Experimentelle und klinische Untersuchungen zur Freisetzung von Gentamicin aus einem Knochenzement. Chirurg 43:441–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Zahar.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Zahar und P. Hannah geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

M. Rudert, Würzburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zahar, A., Hannah, P. Antibiotikazumischung zum Knochenzement beim septischen Prothesenwechsel. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28, 138–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-015-0424-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-015-0424-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation