Skip to main content
Log in

Die offene Therapie des femoroazetabulären Impingements

Open Therapy of Femoroacetabular Impingement

  • Published:
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Operationsziel

Aufhebung eines femoroazetabulären Impingementkonflikts und Herstellung eines schmerzfreien, normalen Bewegungsumfangs.

Indikationen

Femoroazetabuläres Impingement jeglicher Art (Cam/Pincer) und Lokalisation (anterior/posterior).

Kontraindikationen

Absolut: Fortgeschrittene Koxarthrose, Infektionen im Bereich des Operationssitus.

Relativ: Massive Retroversion des Azetabulums mit defizitärer Hinterwand.

Operationstechnik

Chirurgische Hüftluxation: Seitenlage. Gerade laterale Inzision über dem Trochanter major und Eingehen in das Gibson-Intervall. Digastrische Trochanterosteotomie unter Schonung des tiefen Astes der Arteria circumflexa femoris medialis. Eröffnung des Intervalls zwischen Musculus piriformis und Musculus gluteus minimus. Z-förmige Kapsulotomie. Luxation des Femurkopfes. Ablösen des Labrums. Trimmen des azetabulären Überstands. Refixation des Labrums. Herstellung eines suffizienten femoralen Kopf-Hals-Übergangs. Kapselnaht. Refixation des Trochanters.

Weiterbehandlung

Während der Hopitalisierung regelmäßige Behandlung auf der passiven Bewegungsschiene mit maximal 90° Flexion. Keine aktive Abduktion, keine passive Adduktion über die Mittellinie, kein Heben des gestreckten Beins, 10–15 kg Teilbelastung an zwei Unterarmgehstöcken während 6 Wochen. Anschließend erste klinische und radiologische Nachkontrolle und je nach Befund schrittweiser Übergang zur Vollbelastung. Thromboseprophylaxe bis zur Vollbelastung.

Ergebnisse

Kurz- und mittelfristig fand sich eine Verbesserung des postoperativen klinischen Scores (Merle-d’Aubigné-Score) bei 95% aller Patienten, je nach vorbestehendem Arthrosegrad. Gute bis exzellente Ergebnisse wurden in 91% der Fälle erzielt. Die kumulative 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate betrug 91% (Endpunkt Hüfttotalprothese oder schwacher Merle-d’Aubigné-Score). Langzeitergebnisse stehen noch aus.

Abstract

Objective

Elimination of an intraarticular femoroacetabular impingement conflict. Creation of a pain-free, normal range of motion of the hip.

Indications

Femoroacetabular impingement of any type (cam/pincer) and any localization (anterior/posterior).

Contraindications

Absolute: advanced hip osteoarthritis, local infections around the hip.

Relative: excessive acetabular retroversion with deficiency of the posterior wall.

Surgical Technique

Lateral decubitus position. Straight lateral incision centered over the greater trochanter. Entering of the Gibson interval. Digastric trochanteric osteotomy with protection of the medial circumflex femoral artery. Opening of the interval between the piriformis and the gluteus minimus muscle. Z-shaped capsulotomy. Dislocation of the femoral head. Detachment of the labrum. Trimming of the excessive acetabular rim. Refixation of the labrum. Creation of a sufficient femoral head-neck offset. Suture of the capsule. Refixation of the trochanter.

Postoperative Management

During hospital stay, intensive mobilization of the hip joint using a continuous passive motion machine with a maximum flexion of 90°. No active abduction and passive adduction over the body’s midline. Maximum weight bearing 10–15 kg for 6 weeks. Subsequently, first clinical and radiographic follow-up. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing.

Results

Short- and mid-term results showed an improvement of the postoperative clinical score (Merle d’Aubigné Score) in 95% of all patients, depending on the individual degenerative joint alterations at the time of surgery. Good to excellent results were obtained in 91% of all cases. Cumulative 5-year survival was 91% (endpoint total hip arthroplasty or poor Merle d’Aubigné Score). Long-term results are not available yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage — femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1012–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:925–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip. A technique with full access to femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:1119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;417:112–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:679–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Graves ML, Mast JW. Femoroacetabular impingement: do outcomes reliably improve with surgical dislocations? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:717–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersböck A. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:230–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Merle d’Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954;36:451–75.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy SB, Tannast M, Kim YJ. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;429:178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:273–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis — what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1540–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz Tannast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tannast, M., Siebenrock, KA. Die offene Therapie des femoroazetabulären Impingements. Orthop Traumatol 22, 3–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-010-3001-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-010-3001-7

Schlüsselwörter

Key Words

Navigation