Skip to main content
Log in

Origin and Course of the Extracranial Vertebral Artery: CTA Findings and Embryologic Considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to show the different origins and courses of the extracranial VA on CTA with special emphasis on embryological considerations. The duplicated VA is an anomaly that has been assumed to predispose for dissection and to be associated with aneurysms. We report its frequency and clinical significance.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed CTA of 539 patients by using a contrast-enhanced CTA protocol of the VA on CT.

Results

Ninety-four-point-two percent of left VA originated from left subclavian artery and entered the transverse foramen at C6 in nearly all cases. Six-point-three-percent of left VA (m  = 4 %, f  = 10 %) originated from the aortic arch and entered the transverse foramen either at C4, C5 or C7 but never at C6. One case of an aberrant retroesophageal right VA originated from the aortic arch distal to the left subclavian artery and entered at C7 (0.19 %). All other right VA originated from the right subclavian artery (99.8 %) and entered between C4 and C6. We diagnosed four cases of duplicated VA (0.74 %) with a female predominance (1.9 %) without any signs of dissection on CTA. Two cases with VA duplication had intracranial arterial aneurysms.

Conclusions

The VA is a longitudinal anastomosis of segmental metameric arteries. The level of entrance into the transverse foramen indicates which metameric artery or arteries persist. Duplication corresponds to persistence of two segmental arteries and is a rare phenomenon. VA duplication might be associated with vascular lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goddard AJ, Annesley-Williams D, Guthrie JA, Weston M. Duplication of the vertebral artery: report of two cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2001;43:477–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takasato Y, Hayashi H, Kobayashi T, Hashimoto Y. Duplicated origin of right vertebral artery with rudimentary and accessory left vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology. 1992;34(4):287–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ionete C, Omojola MF. MR angiographic demonstration of bilateral duplication of the extracranial vertebral artery: unusual course and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1304–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, Ter Brugge KG. Surgical neuroangiography: clinical vascular anatomy and variations. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melki E, Nasser G, Vandedries C, Adams D, Ducreux D, Denier C. Congenital vertebral duplication: a predisposing risk factor for dissection. J Neurol Sci. 2012;314(1–2):161–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dare AO, Chaloupka JC, Putman CM, et al. Vertebrobasilar dissection in a duplicated cervical vertebral artery: a possible pathoetiologic association? A case report. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;31(1):103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Padget DH. The development of cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contrib Embryol. 1948;32:207–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meila D, Papke K, Schlunz-Hendann M, Mangold A, Jacobs C, Brassel F. Bilateral persistent trigeminal arteries, one of them ending in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuroradiol. 2011;21(2):95–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nogueira TE, Chambers AA, Brueggemeyer MT, Miller TJ. Dual origin of the vertebral artery mimicking dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:382–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Provenzale JM, Sarikaya B, Hacein-Bey L, Wintermark M. Causes of misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies for dissection of the craniocervical arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendi ATK, Brace JR. Vertebral artery duplication and aneurysms: 64-slice multidetector CT findings. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:e216-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agnoli AL. Vascular anomalies and subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with persistent embryonic vessels. Acta Neurochir. 1982;60:183–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cloft HJ, Razack N, Kallmes D. Prevalence of cerebral aneurysms in patients with persistent primitive trigeminal artery. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:865–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Songsaeng D, Geibprasert S, Willinsky R, Tymianski M, TerBrugge KG, Krings T. Impact of anatomical variations of the circle of Willis on the incidence of aneurysms and their recurrence rate following endovascular treatment. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(11):895–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bayrak AH, Senturk S, Akay HO, Ozmen CA, Bukte Y, Nazaroglu H. The frequency of intracranial arterial fenestrations: a study with 64-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(3):392–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bharatha A, Aviv RI, White J, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Intracranial arterial fenestrations: frequency on CT angiography and association with other vascular lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30(5):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Meila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meila, D., Tysiac, M., Petersen, M. et al. Origin and Course of the Extracranial Vertebral Artery: CTA Findings and Embryologic Considerations. Clin Neuroradiol 22, 327–333 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0171-0

Keywords

Navigation