Skip to main content
Log in

Einsatz von Vasopressoren und Inotropika im kardiogenen Schock

Use of vasopressors and inotropics in cardiogenic shock

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Vasoaktive Medikamente und Inotropika sind wichtige Bausteine im hämodynamischen Management des kardiogenen Schocks. In diesem Beitrag wird der Einsatz der unterschiedlichen vasoaktiven und ionotropen Medikamente beim kardiogenen Schock dargestellt. Das hämodynamische Management beim kardiogenen Schock erfolgt nach initialer moderater Volumengabe durch Dobutamin zur Steigerung der Inotropie. Wenn keine ausreichenden Perfusionsdrücke erzielt werden, erfolgt die Gabe von Noradrenalin. Sollte weiterhin keine suffiziente Steigerung der Herzleistung erreicht werden, kann die Gabe von Levosimendan oder Phosphodiesterase (PDE)-Hemmern erfolgen. Levosimendan ist bei Patienten im kardiogenem Schock den PDE-Hemmern vorzuziehen. Ziel des hämodynamischen Managements bei kardiogenem Schock ist der passagere Einsatz von Inotropika und Vasopressoren in der geringsten notwendigen Dosis und nur so lange wie notwendig. Es muss täglich die Frage gestellt werden, ob die Dosis reduziert werden kann bzw. ob der Einsatz eines extrakorporalen Kreislaufunterstützungssystems erwogen werden sollte. Es gibt bisher keine Mortalitätsdaten, die den Nutzen des hämodynamischen Monitorings anhand von Zielkriterien belegen. Der Vorteil ergibt sich aber aus dem sparsameren Einsatz von Inotropika und Vasopressoren durch gewisse Zielkriterien.

Abstract

Vasoactive drugs and inotropic agents are important for the hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock. In this article the use of different vasoactive and ionotropic drugs in cardiogenic shock is presented. Hemodynamic management during cardiogenic shock occurs after initial moderate volume delivery by dobutamine to increase inotropism. If adequate perfusion pressures are not achieved norepinephrine is administered. If a sufficient increase in cardiac performance can still not be achieved by the treatment, administration of levosimendan or phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors may be necessary. Levosimendan is superior to PDE inhibitors for patients in cardiogenic shock. The aim of hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock is to allow the transient use of inotropics and vasopressors in the lowest necessary dose and only as long as necessary. The daily question is whether the dose can be reduced or in the case of deterioration whether the use of an extracorporeal circulatory support system should be considered. There are currently no available data on mortality that demonstrate the benefit of hemodynamic monitoring using target criteria. The advantage, however, results from the economic use of inotropics and vasopressors by certain target criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Ahlquist RP (1948) A study of the adrenotropic receptors. Am J Physiol 153:586–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allwood MJ, Cobbold AF, Ginsburg J (1963) Peripheral vascular effects of noradrenaline, isopropylnoradrenaline and dopamine. Br Med Bull 19:132–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. No authors listed Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 1999;27:639–60

  4. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ (1981) Does the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in critically ill patients? Crit Care Med 9:437–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Packman MI, Rackow EC (1983) Optimum left heart filling pressure during fluid resuscitation of patients with hypovolemic and septic shock. Crit Care Med 11:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Luca L, Colucci WS, Nieminen MS et al (2006) Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings. Eur Heart J 27:1908–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Innes CA, Wagstaff AJ (2003) Levosimendan: a review of its use in the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Drugs 63:2651–2671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russ MA, Prondzinsky R, Christoph A et al (2007) Hemodynamic improvement following levosimendan treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 35:2732–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russ MA, Prondzinsky R, Carter JM et al (2009) Right ventricular function in myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Improvement with levosimendan. Crit Care Med 37:3017–3023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rokyta R Jr, Pechman V (2006) The effects of Levosimendan on global haemodynamics in patients with cardiogenic shock. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 27:121–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delle Karth G, Buberl A, Geppert A et al (2003) Hemodynamic effects of a continuous infusion of levosimendan in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47:1251–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Gonzalez MJ, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Ferrer-Hita JJ et al (2006) Cardiogenic shock after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Effects of levosimendan compared with dobutamine on haemodynamics. Eur J Heart Fail 8:723–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Christoph A, Prondzinsky R, Russ M et al (2008) Early and sustained haemodynamic improvement with levosimendan compared to intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Acute Card Care 10:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fuhrmann JT, Schmeisser A, Schulze MR et al. Levosimendan is superior to enoximone in refractory cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2257–66; Editorial: 2450–2451: Comments: 2009;37(3):1181–1182; Erratum: 2008;36(10):2966

  15. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2012) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2013(41):580–637

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Backer D, Creteur J, Silva E, Vincent JL (2003) Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: which is best? Crit Care Med 31:1659–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Hesayen A, Azevedo ER, Newton GE, Parker JD (2002) The effects of dobutamine on cardiac sympathetic activity in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1269–1274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P et al (1995) A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 333:1025–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH et al (1994) Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 330:1717–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J et al (2010) Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 362:779–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mutlu GM, Factor P (2004) Role of vasopressin in the management of septic shock. Intensive Care Med 30:1276–1291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharshar T, Blanchard A, Paillard M et al (2003) Circulating vasopressin levels in septic shock. Crit Care Med 31:1752–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuneyoshi I, Yamada H, Kakihana Y et al (2001) Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of low-dose vasopressin infusions in vasodilatory septic shock. Crit Care Med 29:487–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Varma A, Shah KB, Hess ML (2012) Phosphodiesterase inhibitors, congestive heart failure, and sudden death: time for re-evaluation. Congest Heart Fail. Jul 18(4):229–233

    Google Scholar 

  25. Petros A, Lamb G, Leone A et al (1994) Effects of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in humans with septic shock. Cardiovasc Res 28:349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cotter G, Kaluski E, Blatt A et al (2000) L‑NMMA (a Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor) is Effective in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock. Circulation 101:1358–1361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Stebbins AL et al (2007) Effect of tilarginine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: the TRIUMPH randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297(15):1657–1666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Backer D, Aldecoa C, Njimi H, Vincent JL (2012) Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 40:725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bohr DF (1967) Adrenergic receptors in coronary arteries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 139:799–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peters JI, Utset OM (1989) Vasopressors in shock management: Choosing and using wisely. J Crit Illness 4:62

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM et al (2004) Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(2):340–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cotter G, Williams SG, Vered Z, Tan LB (2003) Role of cardiac power in heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol 18(3):215–222 (May)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Buerke.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Lemm, S. Dietz, M. Janusch und M. Buerke geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemm, H., Dietz, S., Janusch, M. et al. Einsatz von Vasopressoren und Inotropika im kardiogenen Schock. Herz 42, 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-016-4525-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-016-4525-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation