Skip to main content
Log in

Direkte Antikoagulanzien bei Vorhofflimmern

Update 2014

Direct anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation

Update 2014

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Vitamin-K-Antagonisten (VKA) waren jahrzehntelang der Standard in der Schlaganfallprophylaxe bei Vorhofflimmern. Wegen der bekannten Unannehmlichkeiten (u. a. schwankende Wirkspiegel durch alimentäre und medikamentöse Interaktionen, was regelmäßige Gerinnungskontrollen erfordert) wurden in den vergangenen Jahren alternative Substanzen, sog. direkte orale Antikoagulanzien (DOAC) entwickelt und in großen klinischen Studien gegenüber VKA getestet. Zu den DOAC gehören das direkte Antithrombin Dabigatran und die direkten Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren Rivaroxaban, Apixaban und Edoxaban. Aufgrund eines gut vorhersehbaren Dosis-Wirkungs-Profils sind in der klinischen Routine keine Laborkontrollen erforderlich. DOAC zeigen eine im Vergleich zu Warfarin gleichwertige bis bessere Effektivität bei der Verhinderung von Schlaganfällen und systemischen Embolien bei einem günstigeren Sicherheitsprofil, welches sich aus einer vergleichbaren bis geringeren Rate an schweren Blutungskomplikationen und einer signifikanten Reduktion von intrakraniellen Blutungen ergibt.

Abstract

For several decades vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the standard for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Because of inconvenience associated with their use (frequently VKA levels cannot be consistently maintained within the therapeutic range, e.g. due to food and drug interactions, which necessitates regular control of international normalized ratios) alternative compounds have recently been developed, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran (a direct antithrombin) as well as rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors). All these agents show a predictable pharmacokinetic profile making routine laboratory controls unnecessary. Moreover, DOACs do not only show a similar or even better efficacy, but also a more attractive safety profile in terms of similar or less major bleeding complications, where all DOACs significantly reduce the rate of intracranial bleeding when compared to VKAs. This review summarizes the pharmacological characteristics and clinical study results of DOACs that have been tested in phase 3 trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 33:2719–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart RG, Benavente O, McBride R, Pearce LA (1999) Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 131:492–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dlott JS, George RA, Huang X et al (2014) A national assessment of warfarin anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Circulation [Epub ahead of print]

  4. Stangier J (2008) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. Clin Pharmacokinet 47:285–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ezekowitz MD, Reilly PA, Nehmiz G et al (2007) Dabigatran with or without concomitant aspirin compared with warfarin alone in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (PETRO Study). Am J Cardiol 100:1419–1426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson L, Hedner T, Dahlöf B (1992) Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point. Blood Press 1:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Hart RG et al (2009) Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 360:2066–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R et al (2006) Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 367:1903–1912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diener HC, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD et al (2010) Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet Neurol 9:1157–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 376:975–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J et al (2011) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation 123:131–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber K, Connolly SJ, Kher A et al (2013) Practical use of dabigatran etexilate for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Int J Clin Pract 67:516–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Ezekowitz MD et al (2013) The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study. Circulation 128:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubitza D, Becka M, Voith B et al (2005) Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BAY 59-7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78:412–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubitza D, Becka M, Wensing G et al (2005) Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 59-7939 – an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor – after multiple dosing in healthy male subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61:873–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hankey GJ, Patel MR, Stevens SR et al (2012) Rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a subgroup analysis of ROCKET AF. Lancet Neurol 11:315–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y et al (2013) Outcomes following cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1998–2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahaffey KW, Hellkamp AS, Patel MR et al (2013) End of study transition from study drug to open-label vitamin K antagonist therapy: the ROCKET AF experience. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 6:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C et al (2011) Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 364:806–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogata K, Mendell-Harary J, Tachibana M et al (2010) Clinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 50:743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weitz JI, Connolly SJ, Patel I et al (2010) Randomised, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational phase 2 study comparing edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 104:633–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M et al (2013) EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Eur Heart J 34:2094–2106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. T. Höchtl-Hainzl und K. Huber geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Höchtl-Hainzl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Höchtl-Hainzl, T., Huber, K. Direkte Antikoagulanzien bei Vorhofflimmern. Herz 39, 357–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-014-4092-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-014-4092-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation