Skip to main content
Log in

Therapeutic Accuracy of Individualized Brackets in Lingual Orthodontics

Behandlungsgenauigkeit mittels individualisierter Brackets in der Lingualtechnik

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

Verification of the therapeutic accuracy of the Incognito ® bracket system.

Material and Methods:

The therapeutic set-up casts and final treatment casts were digitalized using a 3D scanner, and the scans were subsequently superimposed. The deviations in rotation and translation of each tooth in the three spatial dimensions were calculated.

Results:

The front teeth showed deviations in rotations of less than 4.6° and in translations under 0.5 mm. In addition, influences such as upper or lower jaw, growth, type of tooth, anterior tooth position, bracket generation, 3D scanner hardware and finishing archwires were analyzed.

Conclusion:

The clinical impression was confirmed by the measurements taken in this study. The final results following lingual orthodontic treatment using individualized brackets correlate satisfactorily with the therapeutic set-ups.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel:

Verifizierung der Behandlungsgenauigkeit des Incognito®- Bracketsystems.

Material und Methodik:

Die therapeutischen Set-up- und Abschlussmodelle wurden mittels 3D-Scanner digitalisiert, virtuell überlagert und von jedem einzelnen Zahn die Abweichungen der Rotationen und Translationen in den drei Raumdimensionen berechnet.

Ergebnisse:

Die Frontzähne zeigten Abweichungen der Rotationen von weniger als 4,6° und der Translationen von unter 0,5 mm. Außerdem wurden besondere Einflüsse wie Kiefer, Wachstum, Zahn-Typ, Frontzahnstellung, Bracketgeneration, Hardware des 3D-Scanners und verwendete Finishing-Bögen analysiert.

Schlussfolgerung:

Der klinisch gewonnene Eindruck konnte durch die Messergebnisse der Studie bestätigt werden. Eine zufriedenstellende Übereinstimmung des Endergebnisses mit dem therapeutischen Set-up ist in der Lingualtechnik mittels individualisierter Brackets realisierbar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altounian G. Le targ. L’information dentaire 1985;67:2225–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Creekmore TD. Lingual orthodontics — its renaissance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:120–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Creekmore TD. Precision placement of lingual and labial brackets. J Am Ling Orthod Assoc 1988;1:6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940:25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fillion D. Orthodontie linguale: systèmes de positionnement des attaches au laboratoire. Orthod Fr 1980;60:695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D. Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:363–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita, K. Multilingual bracket and Mushroom arch wire technique: A clinical report. Am J Orthod 1982;82:120–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujita, K. New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket and Mushroom arch wire appliance. Am J Orthod 1979;76:657–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geron S, Romano R, Brosh T. Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors — a theoretical approach. Angle Orthod 2004;74:195–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gieseke F. The ICP Algorithm: Theoretical framework and practical realizations. Seminar paper, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiro T, Takemoto K. Resin core indirect bonding system — improvement of lingual orthodontic treatment. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1998;57:83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hohoff A, Stamm T, Ehmer U. Comparison of the effect on oral discomfort of two positioning techniques with lingual brackets. Angle Orthod 2003;73:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hohoff A, Stamm T, Goder G, et al. Comparison of three bonded lingual appliances by auditive and subjective assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:737–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohoff A, Wiechmann D, Fillion D, et al. Evaluation of the parameters underlying the decision by adult patients to opt for lingual therapy: an international comparison. J Orofac Orthop 2003;64:135–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huge SA. The customised lingual appliance set-up service (CLASS) system. In: Romano R, ed. Lingual orthodontics. Hamilton-London: Decker, 1998:163–73.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Müller-Hartwich R. Die Lingualtechnik. Zahnärztl Mitt 2003;22:54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly, VM. JCO interviews on lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1982;16:461–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paige, SF. A lingual light-wire technique. J Clin Orthod 1982;16:534–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pauls, HJ. Lingual orthodontics with orthognatic surgery in a severe Class II, Division 2 case. J Orofac Orthop 2008;69:135–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rummel V, Wiechmann D, Sachdeva R. Precision finishing in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1999;23:101–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Segner, D. Personal communication, Hamburg, Germany.

  23. Smith JR, Gorman JC, Kurz C, Dunn RM. Keys to success in lingual therapy Part 1. J Clin Orthod 1986;89:252–61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stamm T, Hohoff A, Ehmer U. A subjective comparison of two lingual bracket systems. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:420–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thalheim A, Schwestka-Polly R. Klinische Umsetzbarkeit eines Setups in der lingualen Orthodontie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2008;40:277–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development. J Orofac Orthop 2002;63:234–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 2: First clinical experiences and further development. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64:372–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiechmann D. Integration der Lingualtechnik in die tägliche Praxis. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1999;31:9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiechmann D. La thérapeutique eco-linguale. Deuxième partie: Aspects cliniques. J de Edge 2001;43:9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wiechmann D. La thérapeutique eco-linguale. Première partie: Une théorie pour un concept moderne de traitement lingual. J de Edge 2000;42:53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wiechmann D. Lingual orthodontics. Part 2: Archwire fabrication. J Orofac Orthop 1999;60:416–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Harry Pauls.

Additional information

*The study was performed as part of the author’s dissertation at Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauls, A.H. Therapeutic Accuracy of Individualized Brackets in Lingual Orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 71, 348–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-1027-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-1027-3

Key Words:

Schlüsselwörter:

Navigation