Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defensive chemistry of lycid beetles and of mimetic cerambycid beetles that feed on them

  • Published:
Chemoecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary.

Beetles of the family Lycidae have long been known to be chemically protected. We present evidence that North American species of the lycid genera Calopteron and Lycus are rejected by thrushes, wolf spiders, and orb-weaving spiders, and that they contain a systemic compound that could account, at least in part, for this unacceptability. This compound, a novel acetylenic acid that we named lycidic acid, proved actively deterrent in feeding tests with wolf spiders and coccinellid beetles. Species of Lycuscommonly figure as models of mimetic associations. Among their mimics are species of the cerambycid beetle genus Elytroleptus, remarkable because they prey upon the model lycids. We postulated that by doing so Elytroleptus might incorporate the lycidic acid from their prey for their own defense. However, judging from analytical data, the beetles practice no such sequestration, explaining why they remain relatively palatable (in tests with wolf spiders) even after having fed on lycids. Chemical analyses also showed the lycids to contain pyrazines, such as were already known from other Lycidae, potent odorants that could serve in an aposematic capacity to forestall predatory attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Eisner.

Additional information

David Utterback: Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisner, T., Schroeder, F.C., Snyder, N. et al. Defensive chemistry of lycid beetles and of mimetic cerambycid beetles that feed on them. Chemoecology 18, 109–119 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-007-0398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-007-0398-4

Keywords.

Navigation