Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular docking and quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analyses of indolylarylsulfones as HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medicinal Chemistry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indolylarylsulfones (IASs) have received considerable interest during the last decades due to high potency against HIV-1 as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In present work, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and molecular docking analyses were performed to model the anti-HIV-1 activity of 36 IASs. 2D and 3D-descriptors, genetic algorithm, internal and external validations were used to develop statistically robust four-parametric QSAR models. The best QSAR model is with R 2tr  = 0.8608. The QSAR analysis reveals that the activity of IASs depends on the presence of electronegative and heavy atoms at the internal atmosphere of the compounds. The docking analysis reveals that lipophilic and H-bonding interactions are the prominent interactions among IASs and the receptor. The QSAR analysis proved to be a useful tool in the prediction of anti-HIV-1 activity of congeneric compounds and some important insights were also found that will be useful to guide for the synthesis of new IASs with improved activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QSAR:

Quantitative structure–activity relationship

NNRTIs:

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

IASs:

Indolylarylsulfones

WHO:

World Health Organization

AIDS:

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

HAART:

Highly active antiretroviral therapy

RT:

Reverse transcriptase

GA:

Genetic algorithm

References

  • Chirico N, Gramatica P (2011) Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate it? comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. J Chem Inf Model 51(9):2320–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chirico N, Gramatica P (2012) Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. J Chem Inf Model 52(8):2044–2058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doweyko AM (2008) QSAR: dead or alive? J Comput Aided Mol Des 22(2):81–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Beware of q2! J Mol Graph Model 20(4):269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gramatica P (2013) On the development and validation of QSAR models. Methods Mol Biol 930:499–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gramatica P, Papa E (2007) Screening and ranking of POPs for global half-life: QSAR approaches for prioritization based on molecular structure. Environ Sci Technol 41(8):2833–2839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gramatica P, Pilutti P, Papa E (2007) Approaches for externally validated QSAR modelling of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mutagenicity. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18(1–2):169–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Gramatica P, Kim MG, Kim D, Tratnyek PG (2007) QSAR modelling of water quality indices of alkylphenol pollutants. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18(7–8):729–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovarich S, Papa E, Li J, Gramatica P (2012) QSAR classification models for the screening of the endocrine-disrupting activity of perfluorinated compounds. SAR QSAR Environ Res 23(3–4):207–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La Regina G, Coluccia A, Brancale A, Piscitelli F, Gatti V, Maga G, Samuele A, Pannecouque C, Schols D, Balzarini J, Novellino E, Silvestri R (2011) Indolylarylsulfones as HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: new cyclic substituents at indole-2-carboxamide. J Med Chem 54(6):1587–1598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Gramatica P (2007) QSAR study of selective ligands for the thyroid hormone receptor beta. Bioorg Med Chem 15(15):5251–5261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Papa E, Gramatica P (2008) Evaluation and QSAR modeling on multiple endpoints of estrogen activity based on different bioassays. Chemosphere 70(10):1889–1897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan DT, Masand VH, Patil KN, Ben Hadda T, Jawarkar RD, Thakur SD, Rastija V (2012) CoMSIA and POM analyses of anti-malarial activity of synthetic prodiginines. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22(14):4827–4835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan DT, Masand VH, Patil KN, Hadda TB, Rastija V (2013) Integrating GUSAR and QSAR analyses for antimalarial activity of synthetic prodiginines against multi drug resistant strain. Med Chem Res 22:2284–2292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TM, Harten P, Young DM, Muratov EN, Golbraikh A, Zhu H, Tropsha A (2012) Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling? J Chem Inf Model 52(10):2570–2578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masand VH, Jawarkar RD, Patil KN, Nazerruddin GM, Bajaj SO (2010) Correlation potential of Wiener index and molecular refractivity vis-a`-vis antimalarial activity of xanthone derivatives. Org Chem 6(1):30–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masand VH, Jawarkar RD, Mahajan DT, Hadda TB, Sheikh J, Patil KN (2012) QSAR and CoMFA studies of biphenyl analogs of the anti-tuberculosis drug (6S)-2-nitro-6-{[4-(trifluoromethoxy) benzyl]oxy}-6,7-dihydro-5H-imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]oxazine(PA-824). Med Chem Res 21:2624–2629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masand VH, Mahajan DT, Patil KN, Hadda TB, Youssoufi MH, Jawarkar RD, Shibi IG (2013) Optimization of antimalarial activity of synthetic prodiginines: QSAR, GUSAR, and CoMFA analyses. Chem Biol Drug Des 81(4):527–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sushko I, Novotarskyi S, Korner R, Pandey AK, Cherkasov A, Li J, Gramatica P, Hansen K, Schroeter T, Muller KR, Xi L, Liu H, Yao X, Oberg T, Hormozdiari F, Dao P, Sahinalp C, Todeschini R, Polishchuk P, Artemenko A, Kuz’min V, Martin TM, Young DM, Fourches D, Muratov E, Tropsha A, Baskin I, Horvath D, Marcou G, Muller C, Varnek A, Prokopenko VV, Tetko IV (2010) Applicability domains for classification problems: benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set. J Chem Inf Model 50(12):2094–2111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tropsha A (2010) Best practices for QSAR model development, validation, and exploitation. Mol Inf 29:476–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Report (2011) http://www.who.int/. Accessed 23 Nov 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Dr. K. N. Patil, Amravati and Dr. Ashraf Ali, Singapore for useful discussions. Sincere thanks to Dr. F. C. Raghuwanshi for encouragement and facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay H. Masand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masand, V.H., Mahajan, D.T., Hadda, T.B. et al. Molecular docking and quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analyses of indolylarylsulfones as HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Med Chem Res 23, 417–425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-013-0647-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-013-0647-8

Keywords

Navigation