Skip to main content
Log in

Stop signaling by foragers not encountering danger at a food source

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stop signal is an acoustic negative feedback signal employed by honey bees that plays a key role in foraging regulation and group decision-making. In this study, foragers trained to visit a feeding station were either pinched on the hind femur by an observer in a simulation of a predator attack or left to forage uninhibited. Pinched bees were significantly less likely to perform the waggle dance, a recruitment signal, upon their return to their hive and also significantly more likely to perform the stop signal than bees that had not been pinched. Of note is the observation that approximately 70% of the stop signals recorded during the course of this experiment were performed by bees that had never visited the feeding station at all. This may have occurred because the bees interpreted the presence of a high-reward food source, the feeding station, as a honey-robbing situation. Alternatively, the stop signaling bees may have been unloader bees responsible for taking food from incoming foragers and storing it elsewhere in the hive. These unloader bees may have been overwhelmed by the influx of food from the feeding station and used the stop signal in an effort to modulate the colony’s foraging efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Johnson BR, Nieh JC (2010) Modeling the adaptive role of negative signaling in honey bee intraspecific competition. J Insect Behav 23:459–471

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kietzman PM, Visscher PK (2015) The anti-waggle dance: use of the stop signal as negative feedback. Front Ecol Evol 3:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner WH (1993) Vibrational signals in the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau C, Nieh J (2010) Honey bee stop-signal production: temporal distribution and effect of feeder crowding. Apidologie 4:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieh JC (1993) The stop signal of honey bees: reconsidering its message. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieh JC (2010) A negative feedback signal that is triggered by peril curbs honey bee recruitment. Curr Biol 20:310–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor KA, Seeley TD (2005) The brief piping signal of the honey bee: begging call or stop signal? Ethology 111:775–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: messages and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom C, Gilley D, Tautz J (2003) Worker piping in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the behavior or piping nectar foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Transl. by L. E. Chadwick. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Kietzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kietzman, P.M., Visscher, P.K. & Lalor, J.K. Stop signaling by foragers not encountering danger at a food source. Insect. Soc. 64, 307–309 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0528-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0528-5

Keywords

Navigation