Skip to main content
Log in

The stinging response of the common wasp (Vespula vulgaris): plasticity and variation in individual aggressiveness

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the variability and plasticity of individual aggressiveness in a social insect, describing and quantifying the sting extension response (SER) of the common wasp Vespula vulgaris. As a proxy for individual aggressiveness we measured the SER of individual wasps, scoring the extent by which the sting was extruded in response to a mild electric shock (7.5 or 12 V for 2 s) on a scale from 0 to 1. We found that wasps vary greatly in their stinging propensity and aggression thresholds and that individuals change their SER during their life. Extremely aggressive or docile phenotypes, showing at first consistent mutual differences on different days, tended to converge over time and developed comparable SER responses later in their life. Older individuals tended to be more aggressive. Wasp size was not related to the stinging phenotype. Wasp foragers had a less pronounced sting extension than individuals previously involved in nest defense. For the same individual, the aggressive response was proportional to the intensity of the negative stimulus. We discuss the advantages of the SER bioassay as a tool to measure individual aggressiveness, plasticity and inter-individual variability in the Aculeata group, and its great potential in comparative and learning studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akre RD, Garnett WB, Mac Donald JF, Greene A, Landolt P (1976) Behavior and colony development of Vespula pensylvanica and V. atropilosa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 49:63–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer J (1988) The behavioral biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer ME (2012) Vespine wasps of the world—behavior, ecology & taxonomy of the Vespinae. Siri Scientific Press, Castleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderrama N, Diaz H, Sequeda A, Núñez J, Maldonado H (1987) Behavioral and pharmacological analysis of the stinging response in Africanized and Italian bees. In: Menzel R (ed) Neurobiology and behavior of honeybees. Springer, Berlin, pp 121–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balderrama N, Núñez J, Guerrieri F, Giurfa M (2002) Different functions of two alarm substances in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 188:485–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA et al (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo M et al (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Guzman-Novoa E, Hunt GJ (2004) Defensive behavior of honey bees: organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annu Rev Entomol 49:271–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buck M, Marshall SA, Cheung DKB (2008) Identification atlas of the Vespidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) of the northeastern Nearctic region. Can J Arthropod Identif 5(5). doi:10.3752/cjai.2008.05

  • Crozier RH, Fjerdingstad EJ (2001) Polyandry in social Hymenoptera—disunity in diversity? Ann Zool Fennici 38:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2013) Between-individual differences in behavioral plasticity within populations: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 85:1031–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R (1980) Social wasps—their biology and control. Rentokil Limited, East Grinstead

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaul AT (1952) The awakening and diurnal flight activities of vespine wasps. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond Ser A 27:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodisman MAD, Kovacs JL, Hoffman EA (2007) The significance of multiple mating in the social wasp Vespula maculifrons. Evolution 61:2260–2267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene (1991) Dolichovespula and Vespula. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

  • Grinsted L, Pruitt JN, Settepani V, Bilde T (2013) Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proc R Soc B 280:20131407. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1407

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrieri FJ, D’Ettorre P (2008) The mandible opening response: quantifying aggression elicited by chemical cues in ants. J Exp Biol 211:1109–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna C, Cook ED, Thompson AR, Dare LE, Palaski AL, Foote D, Goodisman MAD (2013) Colony social structure in native and invasive populations of the social wasp Vespula pensylvanica. Biol Invasions 16:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogendoorn K, Velthuis HHW (1999) Task allocation and reproductive skew in social mass provisioning carpenter bees in relation to age and size. Insect Soc 46:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J (2007) The evolution of social wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

  • Jeanne RL (1988) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne RL, Williams N, Yandell B (1992) Age polyethism and defense in a tropical social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 5:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Weidenmüller A (2013) Interindividual variability in social insects—proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 89:671–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes SA, Fergusson-Kolmes LA (1989) Stinging behavior and residual value of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera). J New York Entomol Soc 97:218–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir J-C, Laloi D, Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Solignac M, Pham MH (2006) Intra-colonial variation of the sting extension response in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Insect Soc 53:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London KB, Jeanne RL (1996) Alarm in a wasp-wasp nesting association: do members signal cross-specifically? Insect Soc 43:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London KB, Jeanne RL (2003) Effects of colony size and stage of development on defense response by the swarm-founding wasp Polybia occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loope KJ (2014) Why do vespine wasp workers commit matricide? In: 17th Congress of the International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI), Cairns, Australia, 13–18 July 2014

  • MacNulty DR, Smith DW, Mech LD, Eberly LE (2009) Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better? J Anim Ecol 78:532–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura M, Yamane S (1990) Biology of the vespine wasps. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

  • Monceau K, Bonnard O, Thiéry D (2013) Relationship between the age of Vespa velutina workers and their defensive behavior established from colonies maintained in the laboratory. Insect Soc 60:437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreyra S, D’Adamo P, Lozada M (2014) The influence of past experience on wasp choice related to foraging behavior. Insect Sci 21:759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Jeanne RL (1995) The roles of body size and dominance in division of labor among workers of the eusocial wasp Polybia occidentalis (Olivier) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 68:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH (2007) Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson EJ (2000) Parachartergus fraternus (Gribodo) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae) uses venom when taking caterpillar prey. Psyche 103:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish M (1984) Factors influencing aggression between foraging yellowjacket wasps, Vespula spp. (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:306–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton RJ, Sakamoto CH, Rugiga FCN (1994) Modification of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) stinging behavior by within-colony environment and age. J Apicult Res 33:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter-Wollman N (2012) Personality in social insects: how does worker personality determine colony personality? Curr Zool 58:580–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter-Wollman N, Hubler J (2012) How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1407–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter NB (1964) A study on the biology of the common wasp, Vespula vulgaris L., with special reference to the foraging behaviour. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bristol

  • Raveret Richter M (2000) Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annu Rev Entomol 45:121–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed HC, Landolt PJ (2000) Application of alarm pheromone to targets by southern yellowjackets (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Fla Entomol 83:193–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Matthews RW (1991) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. doi: ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  • Santoro D, Polidori C, Asís JD, Tormos J (2011) Complex interactions between components of individual prey specialization affect mechanisms of niche variation in a grasshopper-hunting wasp. J Anim Ecol 80:1123–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution and behavior, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter JR, Rueppell O (2011) A review on self-destructive defense behaviors in social insects. Insect Soc 59:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Brockmann A, Halbig C, Tautz J (2007) Size determines antennal sensitivity and behavioral threshold to odors in bumblebee workers. Naturwissenschaften 94:733–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spradbery PJ (1972) A biometric study of seasonal variation in worker wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Ent (A) 47:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradbery PJ (1973) Wasps—an account of the biology and natural history of solitary and social wasps. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann J (2001) The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insect Soc 48:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Denuebourg J-N (1998) Response threshold reinforcements and division of labor in insect societies. Proc R Soc B 265:327–332

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Togni O, Giannotti E (2010) Colony defense behavior of the primitively eusocial wasp, Mischocyttarus cerberus is related to age. J Insect Sci 10:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Rubio JL (2013) Genotype and task influence stinging response thresholds of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) workers of African and European descent. Open J Ecol 3:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Rubio JL, Guzmán-Novoa E, Vázquez-Peláez CG, Hunt GJ (2008) Genotype, task specialization, and nest environment influence the stinging response thresholds of individual Africanized and European honeybees to electrical stimulation. Behav Genet 38:93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vergoz V, Roussel E, Sandoz J-C, Giurfa M (2007) Aversive learning in honeybees revealed by the olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex. PLoS One 2:e288. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000288

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter RS, Visscher PK, Camazine S (1999) Mass envenomations by honey bees and wasps. West J Med 170:223–227

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Enquist B, McGill B (2012) The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Weissing F (2012) Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27:452–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lloyd Stringer for his help during nest excavation, Flore Mas and Rafael Barbieri for insightful advice during data collection and analysis, Michael Breed, Kevin Loope and one anonymous reviewer for their suggestions. This work was funded by Victoria University of Wellington.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Santoro.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 482 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santoro, D., Hartley, S., Suckling, D.M. et al. The stinging response of the common wasp (Vespula vulgaris): plasticity and variation in individual aggressiveness. Insect. Soc. 62, 455–463 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0424-4

Keywords

Navigation