Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simple rules result in the adaptive turning of food items to reduce drag during cooperative food transport in the ant Pheidole oxyops

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insect workers cooperate to carry out a variety of tasks. One example is cooperative transport of food items by two or more ant workers, which is important in foraging in many species. We predicted that natural selection would result in strategies that improve the performance of this task and tested this in Pheidole oxyops, a Neotropical ant in which ca. 70% of the biomass of dead insects brought back to the nest is transported cooperatively. We specifically tested the hypothesis that groups would re-orient food items to reduce drag, given that legs, wings, and other projections should affect the ease of dragging prey in different orientations. By presenting ants with artificial food items and dead cockroaches, both of which required approximately twice as much force to drag backwards as forwards, and a control which was equally easy to move in both orientations, we showed that natural groups of 3–20 food-transporting ants usually turned items that were facing backwards (72 and 83% of trials for artificial food items or cockroaches, respectively), the orientation requiring greater force, but not items facing forwards (10 and 12% of trials, respectively). Turning usually involved a single ‘steering’ ant. The key role of the ‘steering’ ant was shown by removing either the current steering ant or a randomly chosen ‘non-steering’ ant during turning. In 100% of the trials in which the steering ant was removed, turning stopped until another ant took its place. Conversely, turning stopped in only 17% of trials in which a ‘non-steering’ ant was removed. Turning is an emergent property of the system and may not have been directly selected for. Rather, turning seems to occur through a combination of pre-existing retrieval behaviour and the underlying physics of large loads. Points where the food item catches the ground can act as a fulcrum or pivot around which the item can rotate. Ants furthest from the fulcrum have more leverage and so are more likely to play a key role in turning. A simple rule relevant to individual transport of food items such as “grasp the food item and move towards the nest”, when used in the context of cooperative transport, has allowed the ants to solve a seemingly complicated problem requiring coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amor F., Ortega P., Cerdá X. and Boulay R. 2010. Cooperative prey-retrieving in the ant Cataglyphis floricola: an unusual short-distance recruitment. Insect. Soc. 57: 91-94

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C., Boomsma J. and Bartholdi I. 2002. Task partitioning in insect societies: bucket brigades. Insect. Soc. 49: 171-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D., Sarkar D., Bates M.D. and Matrix L.T. 2007. The lme4 package. Linear Mixed-effects models using S 4. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

  • Bolker B.M., Brooks M.E., Clark C.J., Geange S.W., Poulsen J.R., Stevens M.H. and White J.S. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127-135

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S., Deneubourg J.-L., Franks N.R., Sneyd J., Theraulaz G. and Bonabeau E. 2003. Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton University Press. 538 pp

  • Cerdá X., Angulo E., Boulay R. and Lenoir A. 2009. Individual and collective foraging decisions: a field study of worker recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63: 551-562

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá X., Retana J. and Cros S. 1998. Prey size reverses the outcome of interference interactions of scavenger ants. Oikos 82: 99-110

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly-Schweitzer S., Beugnon G. and Lachaud J. 2007. Prey weight and overwhelming difficulty impact the choice of retrieval strategy in the Neotropical ant Gnamptogenys sulcata (F. Smith). Insect. Soc. 54: 319-328

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C. 1990. Field study on foraging by the polymorphic ant species, Pheidole pallidula. Insect. Soc. 37: 315-332

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.-L. 1997. Scavenging by Pheidole pallidula: a key for understanding decision-making. Anim. Behav. 53: 537-547

    Google Scholar 

  • Feener D. and Moss K. 1990. Defence against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 17-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks N.R. 1986. Teams in social insects: group retrieval of prey by army ants (Eciton burchelli, Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 425-429

  • Franks N.R., Sendova-Franks A.B. and Anderson C. 2001. Division of labour within teams of New World and Old World army ants. Anim. Behav. 62: 635-642

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks N.R., Wilby A., Silverman B.W. and Tofts C. 1992. Self-organizing nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim. Behav. 44: 357-375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart A.G. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2001. Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 387-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B., Stanton R.C. and Markl H. 1978. Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Formicidae, Hymenoptera): I. Chemical signals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 4: 163-181

    Google Scholar 

  • Kube C.R. and Bonabeau E. 2000. Cooperative transport by ants and robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 30: 85-101

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee A. 1998. VirtualDub 1.8.8. Available from: http://www.virtualdub.org/index.html

  • Mallon E., Pratt S. and Franks N.R. 2001. Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 352-359

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett M.W. 1992. Ant foraging. Natl. Geogr. Res. Explor 8: 220-231

  • Moffett M.W. 1988. Cooperative food transport by an Asiatic ant. Natl. Geogr. Res. 4: 386-394

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan E.D. 2009. Trail pheromones of ants. Physiol. Entomol. 34: 1-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis S. and Dussutour A. 2008. Self-organization, collective decision making and resource exploitation strategies in social insects. Eur. Phys. J. B - Cond. Matter Complex Syst. 65: 379-385

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell S. and Franks N.R. 2005. Caste evolution and ecology: A special worker for novel prey. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 272: 2173-2180

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN:3-900051-07-0

  • Ratnieks F.L.W. and Anderson C. 1999. Task partitioning in insect societies. Insect. Soc. 46: 95-108

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson E.J.H., Jackson D.E., Holcombe M. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2005. Insect communication: ‘No entry’ signal in ant foraging. Nature 438: 442

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson S. and Traniello J. 2002. Transient division of labour and behavioural specialization in the ant Formica schaufussi. Naturwissenschaften 89: 128-131

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T.D. 1995. The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 289 pp

  • Seeley T. and Morse R. 1978. Nest site selection by the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insect. Soc. 25: 323-337

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudd J.H. 1960. The transport of prey by an ant, Pheidole crassinoda EM. Behavior 16: 295-308

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C. 2008. Resource characteristics and competition affect colony and individual foraging strategies of the wood ant Formica integroides. Ecol. Entomol. 33: 127-136

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J. 1983. Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger. Oecologia 59: 94-100

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J. 1987. Comparative foraging ecology of north temperate ants: The role of worker size and cooperative foraging in prey selection. Insect. Soc. 34: 118-130

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J. 1989. Foraging strategies of ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 191-210

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto A., Ishihara S. and Ito F. 2009. Fragmentation or transportation: Mode of large-prey retrieval in arboreal and ground nesting ants. J. Insect Behav. 22: 1-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A. and Smith G.M. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer Verlag. 574 pp

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Paulo Nogueira-Neto for allowing us to stay and work at Fazenda Aretuzina, Jacques Delabie for identification of the study species, Jonathan Bacon for constructive ideas and Katja Rex, the Sussex Social Insect Journal Club and two anonymous referees for constructive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. TC’s PhD studentship was funded by the BBSRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, Sussex, BN19QG, UK

    T. J. Czaczkes & F. L. W. Ratnieks

Authors
  1. T. J. Czaczkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. L. W. Ratnieks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. J. Czaczkes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czaczkes, T.J., Ratnieks, F.L.W. Simple rules result in the adaptive turning of food items to reduce drag during cooperative food transport in the ant Pheidole oxyops . Insect. Soc. 58, 91–96 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0121-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0121-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation